선적…
거기 is is는 아직도 자료 공유를 싸우기 위하여 시기를 정한다
|
|
Geraint Bevan
NO2ID
정보 감독관은 자료 공유의 확산을 염려하게 맞다. 불운하게, 만약에 단지 사람들이 그들의 권리와에 대해 인식하고 있 위험이 감형될 수 있다 아이디어는 잘못 있다. 가장 큰 위험은 "변형 정부"의 관념이다. 이것은 광막한 국민 주체성 기록기의 창조를 수반할 자료를 더 넓게 퍼지는 것을 돕도록 특히 디자인된 국민 주체성 계획의 뒤에 원동력, 이다.
New passport applicants are being summoned to attend the interrogation centre in Blythswood House where, as well as facing the prospect of having biometric data scanned and recorded, they are confronted with personal dossiers compiled from a host of databases. The main purpose of these interrogations is to tidy up existing databases to aid the creation of a national register.
It is not sufficient that we know our rights. As far as the government is concerned, we have none. The Data Protection Act does not prevent the government from sharing data whenever it believes that to be in the public interest. What government department ever believes any of its actions are not in the public interest? We must all take responsibility for protecting our personal data, but that requires that we learn to say no when asked for too much information unnecessarily. We should prepare to say no when summoned to participate in national identity registration. We can start by writing to our elected representatives and telling them that we intend to refuse to participate.
Database State Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'There’s is still time to fight data sharing' :
Related News:
