[رينف.كم]: ال يكسر أخبار خيار
يوم الأحد, يوليو-تمّوز [20ث], 2008
![[رينف] ساحة](http://rinf.com/images/reloaded.jpg)
[رينف.كم]: ال يكسر أخبار خيار
|
|
يكسر أخبار |
الشرطة قوة مع £320 مليون ميزانية - غير أنّ ما من جريمة!
يوم السّبت, يوليو-تمّوز [12ث], 2008 تناقشت هذا تقرير في ال [رينف] ساحات > [نورثومبريا] شرطة واحدة من بريطانيا كبيرة وقوات مشغولة. هو يستخدم أكثر من 4,000 ضابطات ويتلقّى ميزانية من حول £320 مليون سنة. من أنّ, أنفقت أكثر من £1 مليون على ه [بر] قسم. مهما, كصحفية مستقلّة يؤسّس في [نورثومبرلند], أذهلت أنا غالبا في كيف سلميّة المنطقة يكون - أو على الأقلّ إن أنت تصدق القوة [برسّ وفّيس]. على الرغم من القوة الآن يدفع أن يزوّد [برسّ وفّيس] ه في يوم السّبت ويوم الأحد, هناك نهاية أسبوع كاملة عندما لا أطلقت واحدة جريمة إلى الأوساط. غير أنّ هناك أكثر مبدأ أساسيّة هنا وأنّ التقليد [أج-ولد] من الشرطة يستعمل الأوساط أن يحذّر الجمهور حول ماذا يكون يذهب فوق - وأن يساعدهم مسكت مجرمات. للعقد متأخّرة, قد اشترك أنا ل [نورثومبريا] شرطة أن يكون أكثر مفتوحة مع الجمهور - [إي.]. الالناس الذي يدفع أجورهم. أنا قد جمعت مئات المثل من جرائم جدّيّة أنّ يتلقّى إمّا لا [ب] أطلقت إلى الأوساط أو يتلقّى يكون أطلقت أسابيع [أر فن] شهور فيما بعد. هذا يتضمّنون عمليّة اغتصاب, سرقات مسلّحة وأخرى هجوم مريعة أنّ يتلقّى يكون حافظت يخفى من الجمهور. في ما بعد يتلقّى [ا نومبر وف] اجتماعات مع الموظّف كبير رئيسيّة مايكل [كريك] على السنون, وعدت أنا يتلقّى يكون بشكل متكرّر الخدمة حسن. ونعم, عزّزت الميزانية ل ال [برسّ وفّيس], يتلقّى يكون - ينمو من £620,000 اثنان سنون [أغو] إلى ال £1 مليون هو الآن يستهلك. يكون هناك يتلقّى أيضا زيادة كبيرة في الرقم القصص حول كيف [سنيور وفّيسر] يكونون عمليّة قطع جريمة أرقام. حقّا, [إفري تيم] هناك جريمة مروّعة - مثل جريمة قتل أو سكينة هجوم - ال [بر] يرفس آلة داخل حياة مع إقتباس من [سنيور وفّيسر] يضغط كيف "نادرة" هذا جرائم يكونون. [أس ولّ س] يمدّد مصداقية, بعض من هذا بيانات [أبّلّينغلي] غير حسّاس. In fact, it would appear they are cutting them so dramatically that one recent weekend saw not one crime worthy of being given out by Northumbria…. However, through an application under the Freedom of Information Act, I discovered there had been more than 4,800 incidents that weekend, including 161 serious crimes. A good question – and one I’ve been trying to have answered for nearly 10 years now. In the past, I have taken the liberty of occasionally writing to or telephoning the senior officer concerned. There then usually followed a reasonable and well-mannered debate in which they would either quote particular “operational reasons” or admit there was no good reason why the public had not been warned. But now, following the publication of a series of articles in The Guardian, The Times, Press Gazette and other publications, I have been banned from even daring to ask such questions. In a letter, Deputy Chief Constable David Warcup claims crimes are not released for “operational reasons” and the force does not have to “justify” such decisions. As a journalist with more than 23 years’ experience – most of it spent specialising in crime – I appreciate there are times when crimes might have to be held back for genuine “operational reasons”. But there is no way they have to be held back in such huge numbers. My contacts tell me that, as part of that strategy, they have to reduce the “fear of crime” and, if that means telling the public less, then so be it. Mr Warcup recently defended the force’s expenditure on PR by saying: “Although crime in Northumbria has fallen significantly in the past 10 years, our research shows that the perception of crime has not. “We have therefore invested a significant amount in services which aim to make sure people have a better understanding of crime in their region.” Ironically, since the publication of my comments, I have been contacted by a number of police contacts who agree with my stance. Like me, they are not anti-police. However, as well as being police officers, they are also members of the public – and taxpayers. And, like me, they believe that, in a democracy, the likes of Mr Warcup should have to justify why the public are kept in the dark about what is happening in their area. For more information visit: www.nigelgreenmedia.com See More:UK NewsDiscuss this report in the RINF forums > Have Your Say: The Police force with a £320 million budget – but no crime! 2 Responses to “The Police force with a £320 million budget – but no crime!”
|
Translations             
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
Well done Mr Green, but your seach for answers has only just begun. The Police authorities spend a massive amount on Diversity training, Common Purpose training and NLP courses, some Police Heads are even NLP practitioners.
If Policemen/women are not Diverse enough, they will not be promoted. Police Authorities will be tested on their EU Diversity training by 2009 - not on crime. Diversity training includes political attitude, a programmed officer will tell you that ” this ‘democratically’ elected Government has the power”………… Other officers are perturbed by behavioural changes in some of their colleagues. Some police on ‘postings now do not take the Oath.
These EU citizens are programmed to be anti-British and wrongly believe that Treason and Misprision of Treason are not crimes. They are trained to follow an agenda to change the whole fabric of our police forces and crime fighting to make way for EU State police - or Police State.
We were warned of this long ago, when I too was sceptical, surely people can see what is happening for themselves, if they don’t wake up soon it will be too late.