RINF.COM: Η ΣΠΑΖΟΝΤΑΣ ΕΝΑΛΛΑΚΤΙΚΗ ΛΎΣΗ ΕΙΔΗΣΕΩΝ
|
|
ΣΠΑΖΟΝΤΑΣ ΕΙΔΗΣΕΙΣ |
Το πιό επικίνδυνο άτομο στην Αμερική
Τετάρτη, 20η Αυγούστου 2008 Werther | Η πρώτη κρίση πέρα από το πυρηνικό πρόγραμμα της βόρειας Κορέας προέκυψε στα τέλη του 1994. Ήταν προφανές εκεί δεν ήταν πολύ οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες θα μπορούσε κάνω στο βήμα μέσα μονομερώς και να αφοπλίσει το βόρειο κορεατικό καθεστώς. Οι κυρώσεις, η κανονικά αναπόφευκτη επιλογή απότομα του πολέμου, δεν είχαν καμία έννοια - οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες δεν είχαν κανένα εμπόριο με το Βορρά κατά πρώτο λόγο και το καθεστώς ακολούθησε πολιτική της οικονομικής αυτάρκειας (Juche) σε κάθε περίπτωση. Υπεάρξε πραγματικά μόνο ένα εφικτό σχέδιο δράσης: συλλέξτε όσο το δυνατόν περισσότερους περιφερειακούς συμμάχους, συμφωνήστε με μια διαδικασία τη βόρεια Κορέα για να παγώσει το πυρηνικό πρόγραμμά του, και να υποβάλει προσφορά μια προσφορά στο Βορρά Κορεάτες βάσει ενός υπέρ quo λιρών. Όταν η κυβέρνηση Clinton περιέγραψε το προτεινόμενο σχέδιο δράσης της στο συνέδριο υπεάρξε κάποια γκρίνια. Οι βραχίονας-κυματίζοντας επαγγελματικοί πατριώτες της αμερικανικής πολιτικής κατηγορίας δεν επιθυμούν τη μικρότερη μείωση του Θεός-δικαιώματος της χώρας τους να επιβάλουν τη θέλησή του στο εξωτερικό όταν και καθώς συμπαθεί. Αλλά δεν υπεάρξε καμία λογική εναλλακτική λύση, και εκτός από μερικά δημοκρατικά μέλη σκοτεινών, σπιτιών πίσω-πάγκων μια γενική συναίνεση προέκυψε ότι το συμφωνηθε'ν πλαίσιο της διοίκησης ήταν το καλύτερο μιας κακής σειράς επιλογών. Μόνο ένας πολιτικός οποιασδήποτε πολιτικής στάσης διαφώνησε. Το όνομά του ήταν John Sidney McCain ΙΙΙ. Η μέτρια πρότασή του ήταν ότι οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες πρέπει να προετοιμαστούν να βομβαρδίσουν τις περιοχές βόρειων κορεατικές αντιδραστήρων. Μην απασχολήστε ποτέ ότι θα μπορούσε αρκετές χιλιάες ΗΠΑ. συγκεντρώνεται (και δεκάδες χιλιάδων νοτιοκορεατικοί πολίτες) το περίπου η αποστρατικοποιημένη ζώνη σε μια εικονική ποινή θανάτου. Δεν είχε εμφανιστεί ποτέ σε αυτόν τον αυτοαποκαλούμενο στρατιωτικό εμπειρογνώμονα ότι το βόρειο κορεατικό καθεστώς είχε συσσωρεύσει χιλιάδες μεγάλης ακτίνας κομμάτια πυροβολικού και προωθητές πυραύλων και τους είχε κρύψει στις σήραγγες βόρεια του DMZ. Από αυτές τις θέσεις βόρειος κορεατικός ο στρατιωτικός θα μπορούσε να εξαπολύσει μια χιονοστιβάδα νότου πυρκαγιάς των συνόρων. Το αποτέλεσμα πιθανώς θα ήταν μια επανάληψη του κορεατικού πολέμου του 1950-53 αλλά με ακόμα περισσότερους murderously θανατηφόρα όπλα. Γρήγορα διαβιβάστε έως 1999 και τη μεγάλη σταυροφορία της κυβέρνησης Clinton στα Βαλκάνια (που υπολογίζονται προσεκτικά για να στοχεύσουν σε μια αδύνατη και απομονωμένη χώρα - Clinton δεν ήταν κανένας ανόητος). Η ανθρωπιστική επέμβαση ήταν όλη η οργή αλλά έπρεπε να έχει ως σκοπό να ελαχιστοποιήσει την έκθεση των ΗΠΑ. troops; after all, with no conceivable vital U.S. interest at stake, the public would not contemplate the spilling of American blood without an attendant drop in Clinton’s all-important poll numbers. Some politicians were actually able to set aside their reflexive jingoism and smell the scent of wag-the-dog in the sanctimonious statements of Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright, and Richard Holbrooke. The vote on an authorization of the use of force against Serbia failed in the House on a tie vote of 215-215 — the only time the equivalent of a war declaration failed in either house in U.S. history. In the other chamber John McCain was also critical of the administration’s Balkan policy. Only for him, it wasn’t bellicose enough. Rather than limiting it to a bombing campaign he introduced a joint resolution to authorize the introduction of ground troops into a full-scale war with Serbia, something the Clinton administration did not even ask for. Fortunately, in a rare show of good sense, the Senate tabled the McCain resolution by a vote of 78-22. McCain’s unbridled, almost manic, bellicosity with respect to the quagmire in Iraq is too well known to require elaboration. But the sophistication of his military strategy with respect to that country can be inferred from his remarks to a group of bikers in Sturgis, S.D.: “We’ll win it the right way, and that’s by winning it!” Apparently, though, McCain’s neoconservative handlers have already grown tired of the generational struggle against “Islamofascism” (not to mention their long-planned intention to bomb Iran), for they are already pivoting McCain into a stance of maximal belligerence against Russia. Much has been made about McCain’s relationship with his principal foreign policy handler, Randy Scheunemann, heretofore a paid lobbyist of the Republic of Georgia, and who still benefits financially from part ownership of the lobbying firm that continues to service the Georgia account. This is clearly a conflict of interest and indicates the corruption that is endemic to political campaigns of both parties. But to try to explain McCain’s actions in this way is to misunderstand the man. Scheunemann is merely a toad overstuffed by one too many lunches at the Capitol Grill, in sum, a typical Washington success story. But McCain is sui generis. If Scheunemann had never existed someone else would be writing precisely the same talking points for the presumptive Republican candidate. McCain’s love of war and diplomatic brinkmanship is nothing if not sincere. Perhaps it is the only sincere thing about the man. Democrats are finally stumbling onto the fact, although the press has yet to discover it, that McCain is a serial flip-flopper and prevaricator. Across virtually the entire spectrum of domestic policy McCain has held one position and then jumped to the polar opposite, apparently without noticing the inconsistency (and his pals on the press bus are too polite to bring it up):
And so on. McCain’s hypocrisy is perhaps somewhat more egregious than the practices of the average politician, but not markedly so. After all, politicians do not have principles, they have positions. No doubt the Democrats will make heavy weather of these flip-flops, as they are clearly entitled to. But in so doing they miss the central point about John McCain. All these flip-flops illustrate McCain’s near-total lack of sincerity: he doesn’t really care about the issues at all. In practice he changes positions so easily because the positions themselves are throwaways. He is required to have them for political purposes, but they mostly bore and annoy him. There is only one thing he cares about, and that is building an altar to Mars. War is the one fixed star in the McCain universe. You will find no flip-flopping or prevaricating there. While McCain admits he doesn’t understand the economy (and then denies that he doesn’t), he claims unlimited expertise in national security matters. His belligerent megalomania with respect to the Georgian crisis has now, finally, even earned him a mild reproof from the neocon-friendly Washington Post: “Standing behind a lectern in Michigan this week, with two trusted senators ready to do his bidding, John McCain seemed to forget for a moment that he was only running for president.” In a development little reported in the U.S., Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili “claimed that Georgia’s ports and airports would be placed under U.S. military protection, a suggestion quickly denied by the Pentagon.” Assuming that the Department of Defense is telling the truth (and granted that it is difficult to determine whether the Pentagon or Saakashvili is more prone to fabrication), then where did the Georgian president get his information that the United States would be militarily intervening? Given that McCain claims to talk to Saakashvili every day, and given a string of grandiose pronouncements by McCain and his handlers regarding Georgia, is it possible that he misled Saakashvili, either deliberately or by implication, to believe that U.S. military intervention would be forthcoming? It is still unclear whether McCain promised Saakashvili anything, or whether it was simply the Georgian president’s own delusion that he was the apple of Washington’s eye, but McCain’s buttinski tactics would already have been a major scandal if any other American politician who was not the sitting president had made such inflammatory pronouncements on foreign policy. As it is, McCain is already, in his campaign ukases, dramatically downgrading relations with Russia in a manner that suggests he thinks he is president. The public is inclined to believe the worst of a politician when he is insincere, inconsistent, or dishonest; indeed, such personality traits are virtually what makes the typical politician as we know him today. But such creatures are merely nuisances, like mosquitoes. The really dangerous politician is one with an idée fixe, and when that obsession centers on the desirability of perpetual war, the possibility of catastrophe is all too real. Given who he is, what makes him tick, and the potential that he might actually realize his ambitions on the world stage, John McCain is the most dangerous man in America. Have Your Say: The Most Dangerous Man in America Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 20th, 2008 at 1:35 pm and is filed under Contributions & Guests . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. |
![]() Translations ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
bush and mccain are to america what putin and medvedev are to Russia