<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sink the BNP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/sink-the-bnp/6074/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/sink-the-bnp/6074/</link>
	<description>Breaking News, Alternative News &#38; Media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Democratiseuk</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/sink-the-bnp/6074/comment-page-1/#comment-280738</link>
		<dc:creator>Democratiseuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/sink-the-bnp/6074/#comment-280738</guid>
		<description>Correction:

Violence is the first resort of the incompetent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction:</p>
<p>Violence is the first resort of the incompetent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democratiseuk</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/sink-the-bnp/6074/comment-page-1/#comment-280678</link>
		<dc:creator>Democratiseuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/sink-the-bnp/6074/#comment-280678</guid>
		<description>I note your statement:
"..That is not to say that the BNP’s presence does not stoke racist attacks, it does,.."

From your posting guidelines link, it says:
"3. Always provide sources and give credit where it is due."

So please practice what you preach. You've made a key claim against the BNP. Sources? We're not all at tabloid level.

"..the tactics of physical confrontation can only be the smallest part of our response."

Indeed? Inciting the assault on democratically-elected MEPs (they polled over 1 Million votes) was the stock-in-trade of the paramilitary bully-boys of the 1930s fascists, Nazi SA brownshirts, etc. So things have turned fully 180 degrees since those days, by the sound of it. Some are now saying that anti-fascism is the new fascism.

Violence is the last resort of the incompetent, is it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note your statement:<br />
&#8220;..That is not to say that the BNP’s presence does not stoke racist attacks, it does,..&#8221;</p>
<p>From your posting guidelines link, it says:<br />
&#8220;3. Always provide sources and give credit where it is due.&#8221;</p>
<p>So please practice what you preach. You&#8217;ve made a key claim against the BNP. Sources? We&#8217;re not all at tabloid level.</p>
<p>&#8220;..the tactics of physical confrontation can only be the smallest part of our response.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed? Inciting the assault on democratically-elected MEPs (they polled over 1 Million votes) was the stock-in-trade of the paramilitary bully-boys of the 1930s fascists, Nazi SA brownshirts, etc. So things have turned fully 180 degrees since those days, by the sound of it. Some are now saying that anti-fascism is the new fascism.</p>
<p>Violence is the last resort of the incompetent, is it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayatcov</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/sink-the-bnp/6074/comment-page-1/#comment-277795</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayatcov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/sink-the-bnp/6074/#comment-277795</guid>
		<description>The UAF, oh yes that's the United And Fascist group isn't it?
After several expeditions on to various sites for an answer I have failed to find one. Can you supply it please.
My question is, why is it OK to accept MEPs from Sinn Fein, remembering that they have planted bombs.
Have murdered members of the police or the armed forces.
Have attempted to assassinate the Prime Minister, members of the Government and members of the Royal Family.
Have stabbed people in the heart, gouged out their eyes or shot them in the kneecaps.
Have smuggled guns and mortars, or formed and maintained an illegal army.
Quite why you are more concerned by the presence of Nick Griffin as an MEP, who to my understanding has only passed an opinion and harmed no one, than the unrepentant terrorist Gerry Adams and co: is utterly bemusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UAF, oh yes that&#8217;s the United And Fascist group isn&#8217;t it?<br />
After several expeditions on to various sites for an answer I have failed to find one. Can you supply it please.<br />
My question is, why is it OK to accept MEPs from Sinn Fein, remembering that they have planted bombs.<br />
Have murdered members of the police or the armed forces.<br />
Have attempted to assassinate the Prime Minister, members of the Government and members of the Royal Family.<br />
Have stabbed people in the heart, gouged out their eyes or shot them in the kneecaps.<br />
Have smuggled guns and mortars, or formed and maintained an illegal army.<br />
Quite why you are more concerned by the presence of Nick Griffin as an MEP, who to my understanding has only passed an opinion and harmed no one, than the unrepentant terrorist Gerry Adams and co: is utterly bemusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
