Mike Ruppert & Peak Oil麥克Ruppert與＆高峰石油

Ian R. Crane 伊恩傳譯起重機

I have learned recently that Mike Ruppert was taken seriously ill in Venezuela and is now recuperating in Canada. 據我了解，最近麥克Ruppert與被帶到了重病，在委內瑞拉，並正在休養，在加拿大。 It’s very sad to hear of Mike’s predicament and wish him a full and speedy recovery. 它的很傷心聽到麥克的困境，並希望他充分和迅速地復甦。 I suspect that Mike has for some time now realised that he is caught up in a web of intrigue which goes far beyond anything he ever dreamed of when he ’signed up’ to poularise the myth of Peak Oil. 我猜想，麥克已經有一段時間，現在意識到他是趕上了一個網站的陰謀，這遠遠超出了他以往任何時候都夢見他的時候， '簽名' poularise神話高峰石油。

‘Crossing the Rubicon’ is a critical part of the official mythology. '越過盧比孔河' 的一個關鍵部分是官方的神話。

I have good reason to suspect the hand of John M. Deutch behind Mike Ruppert’s transition from pioneer of 9/11 Truth to purveyor of Peak Oil mythology. 我有充分理由懷疑他的手約翰米多伊奇背後麥克Ruppert與轉型，從先鋒9 / 11真相，以廣受歡迎的峰值石油神話。 It’s no great secret that Mike made a life-long enemy of Deutch when he exposed CIA drug running during Deutch’s tenure as head of that organisation. 它沒有什麼大秘密，麥克作出了終身只要敵人多伊奇當他揭露中情局藥物跑步，多伊奇的任期內，擔任該組織的。

As a non-executive director of Raytheon, Deutch has benefited personally from the rewards associated with the massive increase in arms sales, as a result of the illegal wars in Afghanistan & Iraq. 作為一個非執行董事，雷神，多伊奇受益親自從獎勵與大規模增加對台軍售，是由於非法的戰爭在阿富汗及伊拉克。 However, his personal financial profit from Raytheon pales into insignificance when compared with the five fold increase in the stock price of Schlumberger, where he has been on the board of directors since 1997 (the year before I left Schlumberger after 19 years; the last three and a half years being based in the NeoCon capital, Houston Texas). 不過，他的個人財務利潤由雷神黯然失色到渺小的時候，相對於五倍增加，在股票價格的Schlumberger的，在那裡他一直在董事局自1997年以來（一年前，我離開了Schlumberger ，經過19年的近3一個半年被總部設在新保守主義資本，休斯頓得克薩斯州） 。

The price of oil in 1999 bottomed at $9.81 per barrel; a figure that was considered to be far too low to sustain an appropriate level of investment in the industry. 石油價格在1999年跌至谷底，在9.81美元桶;這一數字被認為是迄今為止過低，以維持適當水平的投資，整個產業的發展。 The US oil industry was also concerned that if Iraqi oil came back on full stream any time soon, it could depress prices even further. 美國石油業又擔心，如果伊拉克的石油回來，就全部流任何時間很快，它可以壓低價格，甚至進一步。 This would not only have a serious negative effect on the oil industry but would also be detrimental to the flow of the US$ in the international financial markets; thereby reducing the ability of major oil producing countries to purchase US goods & services. 這樣做不僅有嚴重的負面影響，對石油行業，而且還會損害到流通，美元在國際金融市場，從而減少了能力的主要石油生產國，以購買美國的商品與服務。 With the Clinton/Gore regime showing little enthusiasm for addressing these issues, the Neo-Cons saw the window of opportunity to change the political landscape with the forthcoming (2000) presidential election. 與克林頓/戈爾政權顯示很少的熱情為解決這些問題，新保守主義者看到了機會之窗，改變政治景觀與即將舉行（ 2000年）舉行總統選舉。 Taking their lead from Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1997 book, ‘The Grand Chessboard’ , the Neo-Con think-tank known as ‘The Project for the New American Century’ produced their blueprint for an aggressive US foreign policy in their September 2000 report titled, ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses – Strategy, Forces & Resources for a New Century’ . 同時，他們率先從布熱津斯基1997年的書中， '大棋盤上' ，新保守派智囊型稱為'項目為新美國世紀 ' ，他們製作的藍圖咄咄逼人的美國外交政策，在其2000年9月，一份題為'重建美國的防禦-戰略，力量與資源，為新世紀' 。

Once in office, Dick Cheney commissioned a report on behalf of his oilfield buddies (Cheney was CEO of Halliburton from 1995 until being elected/appointed vice-President in 2000) titled, ‘Strategic Energy Policy Challenges for the 21st Century’ . 一旦上台，切尼委託的一份報告就代表他的油田朋友（切尼首席執行官3518美元，從1995年到當選/任命的副總統， 2000年） ，名為'戰略能源政策挑戰，為21世紀' 。 The report was supposedly produced by ‘An independent Task Force, sponsored by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University and The Council on Foreign Relations’ . 這份報告是假定所產生的'一個獨立的專責小組，由詹姆斯貝克三世研究所公共政策的萊斯大學和外交關係委員會' 。 One of the participants in the discussions leading to the production of this report was ‘Kenny boy’ Lay; none other than the now disgraced (and supposedly deceased) ex-CEO of ENRON and major contributor to the Bush/Cheney 2000 campaign fund. 一位與會者在討論中導致生產這份報告是'肯尼男孩'敷設;莫過於現在蒙羞（假定已故）的前首席執行官的安然公司和主要貢獻者，布什/切尼2000年競選基金。 Another of the signatories of this report was Thomas F. McLarty, Vice-Chairman of Kissinger McLarty Associates, listed as ‘an international strategic advisory firm’. 另一位簽署人的這份報告是托馬斯麥克拉蒂，副會長基辛格麥克拉蒂聯營公司，上市公司作為一種國際戰略諮詢公司' 。 An Independent Task Force? 一個獨立的專責小組？ Need I say more? 我還需要多說嗎？

However, one of the lesser known but most significant participants in the production of this document was one Matthew Simmons, President of Simmons & Company International, a specialised energy investment bank. 但是，其中的知名度較低，但最重要的參與者，在生產中的這一文件是一個馬修西蒙斯主席西蒙斯＆ Company的國際組織，一個專門的能源投資銀行。 Simmons is also a member of the National Petroleum Council and Bush/Cheney Energy Transition Advisory Committee and past Chairman of the National Ocean Industries Association. 西蒙斯也是成員之一，全國石油委員會和布什/切尼能量轉換諮詢委員會和過去的全國政協主席海洋產業協會。 Whilst Colin Campbell takes the credit for re-awakening interest in the work of Dr. Marion King Hubbert (he didn’t like the name Marion, so he had everyone address him as ‘King’), Matthew Simmons, who admits to first reading Campbell’s hypothesis in 1996, was instrumental in translating the basic tenets of Hubbert’s depletion theory into an investment context. 雖然科林坎貝爾以信用為重新覺醒感興趣，在工作的博士馬里恩國王胡貝特（他不喜歡這個名字，馬里昂，讓他每個人都稱呼他為'國王' ） ，馬修西蒙斯 ， 他們也承認，以進行首讀坎貝爾的假說，在1996年，但卻是在翻譯中的基本原理，胡貝特的耗竭理論轉化為投資。 All that remained was to get the principles of the theory into the mass consciousness. 一切仍然是獲得原則的理論轉化為群眾的意識。 A strategy that would be absolutely critical in softening the public reaction to the growing realisation that Weapon’s of Mass Destruction would never be found in Iraq; as admitted by Paul Wolfowitz in 2003 that the myth of WMD’s was created for political expediency (link: www.truthout.org/docs_03/053103A.shtml 一項戰略，這將是絕對關鍵在軟化公眾反應日益意識到核武器的大規模毀滅，絕不會在伊拉克發現的;承認保羅沃爾福威茨在2003年的神話，大規模殺傷性武器的是為政治權宜（鏈接： www.truthout.org/docs_03/053103a.shtml

Consequently, it was essential that the American public were initiated into the theory of ‘Peak Oil’ as rapidly as possible. 因此，它是至關重要的是，美國民眾發起到理論的'山頂油'盡快實施這項計劃。 Only Mike Ruppert knows the detail of the circumstances which lead to his infamous interview with Matthew Simmons on August 18th, 2003. 只有麥克Ruppert與知悉詳細的情況，從而導致其臭名昭著的採訪馬修西蒙斯於2003年8月18日。 The reality is that this date was the turning point for Mike Ruppert; by early 2004 Mike had turned his attentions away from exposing the fraud of 9/11, focusing instead on promoting and popularising the theory of ‘Peak Oil’. 現實的情況是，這個日期是轉折點麥克Ruppert與;由2004年初邁克已變成他的注意力遠離揭露欺詐9 / 11 ，而不是著眼於推動和普及理論'山頂油' 。 As a direct result of his outstanding work on 9/11, the majority of his acolytes followed Mike blindly into the very plausible but selectively simplistic theory of ‘Peak Oil’ . 作為一個直接結果，他的傑出工作，對9 / 11 ，大多數他的追隨者隨後麥克盲目進入很可信，但有選擇地簡單化理論的'山頂油' 。 By encouraging Ruppert to incorporate the concept of ‘Peak Oil’ into ‘Crossing the Rubicon’, Simmons was able to ensure that the concept of ‘Peak Oil’ went ‘mainstream’, particularly amongst the 9/11 skeptic community, within a matter of months. 通過鼓勵Ruppert與概念納入'山頂油'變成'越過盧比孔河 ' ，西蒙斯是能夠保證的概念， '山頂油 ' 到'主流' ，尤其是9 / 11置疑社區，內部的事個月。 The subliminal message being that even if the events of 9/11 don’t stand up to scrutiny and the attack on Iraq had been somewhat less than legitimate, these events were a necessity if we (the gas guzzling USA) are to retain our oil dependent life-style … ‘cos ultimately, we the (USA) come first; although the gentlemen of AIPAC & the ADL might have other priorities … but more on that particular issue another time! 在潛意識訊息，即使事件9 / 11不要站起來，以審議及攻打伊拉克已有點不到合法的，這些事件的必需品，如果我們（煤氣省府美國） ，香港才能保持石油依賴的生活方式… … '產地來源證最終，我們（美國）來第一;雖然君子的aipac ＆ ADL的可能有其他的優先領域… …但更對這一特定問題的另一個時間！

Deutch, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is a serious playmaker; a talent that Euan Baird, Andrew Gould’s predecessor as CEO of Schlumberger, would have been well aware of in selecting him to serve as a non-executive Director, despite the fact that there was a serious cloud over the legality of his activities and behaviour while head of the CIA, thanks largely to the tenacious investigative work of a guy by the name of … Mike Ruppert. It was reported that Mike Ruppert, single-handedly, cost CIA Director John Deutch his guaranteed appointment as Secretary of Defense after confronting him at Locke High School with hard facts about CIA drug-dealing (President Clinton pardoned Deutch on his last day in office). 多伊奇會的成員，在對外關係方面，是一項嚴重的球員，一個人才尤安貝爾德，安德魯古爾德的前任首席執行官Schlumberger的，將已深切認識到在選擇他擔任非執行董事，儘管事實上存在著嚴重的陰影他的合法性的活動和行為，而主管中情局，主要得益於頑強的調查工作，一個人受的名字…麥克Ruppert與。據報導，麥克Ruppert與單一手，成本中央情報局局長約翰多伊奇保證他被任命為國防部副對抗後，他在洛克高中與確鑿的事實約中央情報局毒品交易（克林頓總統赦免多伊奇對他的最後一天，在辦公室） 。 Based upon the circles in which they move, it is unthinkable that Deutch and Simmons (also a member of the CFR), would not have crossed each others paths on numerous occasions but if any confirmation were needed that these two major players have had considerable direct contact, look no further than an organisation called ‘Resources for the Future’ , where both Deutch and Simmons serve as Board Members! 根據圓圈中，他們提出，這是不可思議的多伊奇和西蒙斯（也是成員之一，病死率） ，將不會越過對方的路徑多次，但如果任何有需要進行確認，這兩名主要球員有相當大的直接聯絡，不要再觀望，比一個組織所謂'資源，為將來' ，而這兩個多伊奇和西蒙斯作為董事會成員！ Deutch’s membership the CFR, his previous membership of the intelligence community, coupled with his Phi Beta Kappa connections, would have been more than enough to ‘arrange’ for the highest profile 9/11 antagonist, to become the populariser of Peak Oil, either wittingly or otherwise! 多伊奇的成員病死率，他的前成員的情報，再加上他的PHI測試Kappa值連線，將有足夠多的'安排'為最高剖面9 / 11拮抗劑，成為populariser山頂油，無論是有意或以其他方式！

As an aside, it is interesting to note that Deutch was invited to be the Phi Beta Kappa orator at Harvard in June 2005, delivering a speech to recent PBK graduates during which he questioned the wisdom of retaining US forces in Iraq. 作為一個不談，這是個有趣地注意到，多伊奇獲邀為潛在危險裝置的測試硬度的演說家在哈佛大學2005年6月的一個記者招待會上發表講話，最近pbk畢業生其間，他質疑的智慧保留美軍在伊拉克的。 Co-incidentally, this speech was delivered exactly one month prior to the London bombings. 合作順便說一句，這個講話一發表，正是一個月前倫敦爆炸案。 In 2006, Deutch then chaired the Independent Task Force established by the Council on Foreign Relations to produce the report on ‘National Security Consequences of US Oil Dependency’ , a role in which he was able to bring fellow Schlumberger Board Member Linda G. Stuntz to the attention of the CFR. 在2006年，多伊奇然後主持獨立成立專責小組，由外交關係委員會出示的報告對國家安全的後果，是美國石油的依賴' ，角色，而他能夠掌控研究員Schlumberger的董事會成員琳達g.斯頓茨至注意病死率。

As a further aside, Jamie Gorelick, another Schlumberger Board Member and member of the CFR, was instrumental in ensuring that the 9/11 Commission stayed ‘on message’ … but more on her another time. 為進一步不談，傑米gorelick ，另一Schlumberger的董事會成員和會員的病死率，是在確保9 / 11委員會下榻的'信息' … …但更對她的另一種時間。

All that said, I do not advocate a continuation of ninety million barrel per day consumption … but who do you think owns all the patents on alternative energy? 說到底，我不主張延續9000.0萬桶，每天的消費… …但是，他們這樣做，你認為擁有的所有專利，對替代能源？ The oil & gas industry has much to answer for but by touting and perpetuating the myth of peak oil, my ex-colleagues in the oil industry are laughing all the way to the bank, cashing in stock options that lay moribund for almost twenty years but have in the past three years, provided them with access to wealth beyond their wildest imagination. 石油和天然氣工業中有許多答案，而是由兜攬生意，並延續神話的高峰期油，我的前同事，在石油工業是開懷大笑，所有的路給銀行，套現股票期權奠定奄奄一息了近二十年，但在過去3年來，為他們提供了獲得財富以後，他們瘋狂的想像力。 Just take a look at the obscene profitability reported by all the major oil companies since 2003. 只要看看在色情盈利報告的所有主要油公司自2003年以來。 If any of the big boys seriously believed in Peak Oil they would be investing at much higher levels in new seismic exploration, new drilling techniques, reservoir management and stimulation processes, as well as the construction of new drilling rigs. 如果有任何的大男孩認真相信，在繁忙的石油，他們將投資高得多的水平，在新的地震勘探，鑽井新技術，油藏經營管理，並刺激過程，以及為建設新的鑽井設備。 In fact, they could easily double or even treble the current level of investment and still report record profitability. 事實上，他們可以輕易雙重甚至三重目前的投資水平，並仍有報告創紀錄的盈利能力。 Why don’t they do it? 為什麼不這樣做呢？ Because the theory of Peak Oil has no traction within the industry. 因為理論的高峰石油沒有牽引該行業。 Why don’t they argue against it? 為什麼不反對呢？ Would you, when you are reaping the phenomenal benefits in ‘Shareholder Value’? 將你，如果你正取得驚人的效益'股東價值'嗎？

Schlumberger and Halliburton, the two major global oilfield services companies, come closest to declaring their interest in perpetuating the Peak Oil mythology by sponsoring Colin Campbell’s Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO); not to be confused with an ASBO … although some might see some synergy between the two! Schlumberger和Halliburton的說，兩大全球性油田服務公司，來最接近宣布，他們的興趣不殆山頂石油神話贊助科林坎貝爾的研究協會峰值石油（ aspo ） ;請不要將它與一個asbo … …雖然有些人可能會看到一些協同開展兩個！

Meanwhile, Matthew Simmons & John Deutch make out like bandits, thanks primarily to the success in getting Mike Ruppert to take up the cause and popularise a theory that would have been far more difficult to implant in the wider consciousness, without his participation. 同時，馬修西蒙斯＆約翰多伊奇弄清楚，像土匪，由於主要是為了成功，在獲得麥克Ruppert與採取行動的原因及普及理論已遠遠難以植牙在更廣泛的意識，沒有他的參與。 Mike’s reward is poor health and life on the run. 麥克的報酬是窮人的健康和生命就潛逃。

I have this vision of John Deutch, wearing a wry smile as he monitors the SLB stock price while thumbing through his copy of ‘Crossing the Rubicon’, saying to himself, “Thanks Mike, you owed me.” 我有這樣的遠見約翰多伊奇身穿wry微笑，因為他監管證券借貸股票價格，而thumbing通過他的副本'越過盧比孔河' ，說對自己， "感謝麥克，你欠我" 。

Selected supporting links: 選定配套鏈接：

www.fromthewilderness.com/ssci.shtml www.fromthewilderness.com / ssci.shtml

www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/dossier/id279/pg1/index.html www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/dossier/id279/pg1/index.html

www.simmonsco-intl.com/files/depletion.pdf www.simmonsco-intl.com/files/depletion.pdf

www.environment.harvard.edu/navigation2/Simmons.pdf www.environment.harvard.edu/navigation2/simmons.pdf

www.oilcrash.com/articles/blackout.htm www.oilcrash.com /文章/ blackout.htm

www.slb.com/content/about/board.asp#jd www.slb.com /內容/公司介紹/ board.asp ＃第納爾

www.wtrg.com/prices.htm www.wtrg.com / prices.htm

www.harvardmagazine.com/commencement/05pbk-deutch.html www.harvardmagazine.com/commencement/05pbk-deutch.html

www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/EnergyTFR.pdf www.cfr.org /內容/出版物/附件/ energytfr.pdf

The above observations and comments are summarised from my forthcoming book ‘Out of Darkness’ , scheduled to be published Spring 2008. 上述看法和意見是撮從我即將出版的書中'出黑暗' ， 預定將發表2008年春季。

Comment on 'Mike Ruppert & Peak Oil' : 評論麥克Ruppert與＆山頂油' ：

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Related News: 相關新聞：