Breaking News 實時新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭與恐怖主義的新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁 | |
| |
 | Translate: 翻譯：               Jon Snow: “Editors sold their souls” to MoD喬恩斯諾： “編輯出售他們的靈魂” ，以國防部 Friday, September 26th, 2008 週五， 08年9月26號 Jon Snow, Channel 4 news anchor,喬恩雪景，第4頻道新聞主播， reveals his anger顯示他的憤怒 on Radio 4 at the廣播電台4日 news blackout on Prince Harry’s新聞封鎖的哈里王子的 deployment to Afghanistan.部署到阿富汗。 On a programme stacked with pro-war journalists, he was asked by media analyst Steve Hewlett how he felt when he found out there had been an embargo.在方案堆滿了支持戰爭的新聞記者，他要求媒體分析師史蒂夫惠普如何時，他覺得他發現了禁運。 Snow replied:斯諾回答說： I was absolutely enraged.我絕對憤怒。 I couldn’t believe that 400 editors could have signed up to this.我簡直不敢相信400的編輯可能簽署了這一點。 Why? 為什麼？ Because we have a protocol which we live by on every working day of the week which is that if someone vulnerable in terms of national security is making a movement or whatever we may well know about it but we won’t in fact tell the listener因為我們有一個協議，我們生活的每一個工作日的一周是，如果有人在脆弱的國家安全是一種運動或任何我們可以清楚地知道它，但我們不會在事實告訴聽眾 If Brown is going off to Iraq you know perfectly well because you have to make your own arrangements but you don’t talk about it.如果布朗正在向伊拉克關閉你知道得很清楚，因為你必須作出自己的安排，但你不談論它。 It seems to me that there was nothing so very different about a movement of Prince Harry to Afghanistan and if they wanted complete secrecy it could fit with that protocol在我看來，沒有什麼非常不同的一個流動的哈里王子前往阿富汗，如果他們想完全保密它可以符合該議定書 The argument from the media organisations that went along with it was that this was in essence what they had sort of done. 這個論點的媒體組織了一起有人說，這是在本質上是他們那種工作要做。 No, and it’s not true.不，這不是真的。 I am certainly aware that the basis of the discussion was: if you do not sign up to this he will not go, we will not deploy.我當然知道，討論的基礎上是：如果你不註冊這個，他不會去，我們不會部署。 Therefore the media suddenly became charged with a role in the deployment of a soldier to Afghanistan, which seemed a most bizarre position to be in.因此，媒體突然成為被控的作用，部署在阿富汗的士兵，這似乎是最離奇的立場是個 This was propaganda, this was not journalism, this was not ferreting about to get at the truth, this was doing somebody else’s bidding, this was the picture that the Ministry of Defence and others wanted put across the front pages of the newspapers, this was a hole in one for the Palace, the military authorities and Prince Harry, there was no journalism involved at all, not one element of it.這是宣傳，這不是新聞，這不是要ferreting獲得的真理，這是做別人的出價，這是圖片，國防部和其他希望把整個頭版的報紙，這是一個洞，一個是故宮，軍事當局和哈里王子，但沒有涉及新聞所有，而不是一個組成部分了。 The media, certainly the BBC , who were in this like everyone else, would dispute that, they would say that the quality of access, that one of the reasons that the deal took some time to stitch together was that arguments over – it appears to me anyway, they appear to be saying – the quality and amount and depth of access, so they are saying that the access enabled them to tell more of the story, to let listeners and viewers see more of what is really going on in Afghanistan because of the access they got because of the deal they had done. 媒體，當然是英國廣播公司，誰在這個像其他人一樣，將爭端，他們會說，質量的准入，其中一個原因，處理了一些時間來縫合在一起是爭論-它似乎我無論如何，他們似乎在說-的質量和數量和深度的機會，所以他們說，訪問使他們能夠告訴更多的故事，讓聽眾和觀眾看到更多的究竟怎麼回事，因為在阿富汗獲取了他們，因為他們的交易做了。 That’s complete garbage, isn’t it.這是完整的垃圾，是不是。 Do you think…? 你覺得... ？ Absolute garbage.絕對的垃圾。 What was going on?發生了什麼事情？ What was going on was a number of posed photographs.發生了什麼事情是造成一些照片。 Did they say: “We moved around the village and Harry posed on a motorbike.他們說： “我們搬到村周圍和哈里帶來了摩托車。 Whose it was we don’t know, it was red, it was probably nicked from some Afghan.”誰是我們不知道，這是紅色的，那很可能是從缺口一些阿富汗。 “ What was the truth? 什麼是真理？ Does an air traffic controller actually shoot from a machine gun nest? 是否有一個空中交通管制從實際拍攝一個機槍巢？ The BBC didn’t reveal this to us. 英國廣播公司沒有透露這給我們。 No, this was a series of manipulated photo-opportunities, it was not journalism and did not in any sense describe what was going on in Afghanistan.不，這是一種操縱的一系列照片的機會，這不是新聞，並沒有在任何意義上說明了事情的原委在阿富汗。 Were you surprised at the reaction to your comments? 你感到驚訝的反應你的意見？ Not remotely.沒有遙控。 Not remotely.沒有遙控。 Do you think 400 editors who have sold their souls for a mess of pottage are in some way going to start being nice to me about my one lone voice of rebellion?你認為誰400編輯出售他們的靈魂一個混亂的濃湯是在某種程度上將開始受到很好，我對我的一個孤獨的聲音叛亂？ No, absolutely not.不，絕對不是。 But I know I was right.但是我知道我是正確的。 And I have to tell you, I have had a vast mailbag from editors, friends, journalists, other people saying: “Spot on mate” – and viewers too.我要告訴你，我產生了巨大的郵袋從編輯，朋友，新聞記者，其他人說： “對隊友現貨” -和觀眾太多。 Has it done the prince any good? 它所做的王子嗎？ I think it’s done the press a lot of harm.我認為這是新聞界做了很多傷害。 Has it done the prince any good?它所做的王子嗎？ Of course.當然。 Of course it’sa much better image than someone rolling around in the street half drunk.當然，這是好多人的形象比周圍滾動在街上一半醉了。 Have Your Say: Jon Snow: “Editors sold their souls” to MoD 你說：喬恩斯諾： “編輯出售他們的靈魂” ，以國防部 Please read our請仔細閱讀我們的 posting guidelines before posting張貼在發布前的指導方針 . 。 Alternatively或者 you can discuss this report here你可以討論這份報告在這裡 . 。 One Response to “Jon Snow: “Editors sold their souls” to MoD”一對“喬恩斯諾： ”編輯出售他們的靈魂“ ，以國防部”
Related News 相關新聞
| Are We on the Brink of a 'New Little Ice Age?'是我們的邊緣，一個新的小冰期？ ' Last post by Kline0 @ 01:49 AM 最後職位Kline0 @上午01點49分 Go to Forum進入論壇 | Latest Topics最新的話題 Hey everyone :-)嘿大家:-) Last post by Kline0 @ 01:07 AM 最後職位Kline0 @上午01點07 UK military reports loss of 3 disks英國國防部的報告虧損3盤 Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:13 AM 最後職位懷舊@上午12時13 ...and Finally...和最後... ... Last post by Mick @ 12:13 AM 最後職位米克@上午12時13分 Over The Yard Arm在院子裡手臂 Last post by Mick @ 12:13 AM 最後職位米克@上午12時13分 Worth-y Cause值得- γ原因 Last post by Mick @ 12:13 AM 最後職位米克@上午12時13分 Who Loves Yer, Babi誰愛你們，巴比 Last post by Mick @ 12:13 AM 最後職位米克@上午12時13分 Crap Arrest Of The Week廢話逮捕週 Last post by Mick @ 12:13 AM 最後職位米克@上午12時13分 Grand Day Out大一天 Last post by Mick @ 12:13 AM 最後職位米克@上午12時13分 Lost In Transition迷失在轉型期 Last post by Mick @ 12:13 AM 最後職位米克@上午12時13分  Email This Page To A Friend 本頁發送給朋友 Latest Headlines 最新的頭條
More更多 Breaking News實時新聞  Archive 存檔
|
About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD商店 | | Opinion 意見 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員 |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 中表達的意見RINF新聞電線和通訊是唯一的責任作者（ s ）和不一定反映意見的管理員。 RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. RINF.COM ：打破新聞和其他媒體的版權-複製及分發自由。 News Forum 新聞論壇 |
This is an interesting story .這是一個有趣的故事。 Good on Jon Snow for speaking his mind .良好的喬恩斯諾發言了主意。 The fact that the media ‘The Whole Mass Media’ could have been brought into this is very telling indeed .事實上，媒體'的全體大眾傳播媒介，可以被帶入這是非常講確實。 A matter of public security , maybe .一個令人公共安全，也許。 But then again all the coverage was or as Jon Snow seem to imply ‘It was staged’ !但是，然後再所有的覆蓋面或喬恩斯諾似乎意味著，這是演出' ！ . 。 Maybe he went maybe he was in the Gobi Dessert who will ever know for sure ?也許他，也許他是在戈壁沙漠將永遠誰知道？ . 。 But the importent issue here is the ‘Secrecy’ !但在這裡importent問題是'保密' ！ . 。 If the ‘Mass Media’ can be ‘Told What They Can Or Cannot Say’ , whether this be true or fiction , then what else are they being told to tell us .如果'大眾傳媒'可以告訴他們什麼可以或不可以餵' ，這是否是真實的或虛構的，那麼什麼是他們被告知，告訴我們。 Maybe nothing .也許一無所獲。 But i smell a rat .但是，我聞老鼠。 Don’t you ?難道你不？ . 。