World News | Forum | UK News | USA News | Global News | Political News | Sci-Tech News | War & Terrorism News | Sports News | Multimedia | Set Homepage
Forum
Latest News
RINF Forum
Translate: Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Jon Snow: “Editors sold their souls” to MoD

Friday, September 26th, 2008

Jon Snow, Channel 4 news anchor, reveals his anger on Radio 4 at the news blackout on Prince Harry’s deployment to Afghanistan. On a programme stacked with pro-war journalists, he was asked by media analyst Steve Hewlett how he felt when he found out there had been an embargo. Snow replied:

I was absolutely enraged. I couldn’t believe that 400 editors could have signed up to this.

Why?

Because we have a protocol which we live by on every working day of the week which is that if someone vulnerable in terms of national security is making a movement or whatever we may well know about it but we won’t in fact tell the listener

If Brown is going off to Iraq you know perfectly well because you have to make your own arrangements but you don’t talk about it.

It seems to me that there was nothing so very different about a movement of Prince Harry to Afghanistan and if they wanted complete secrecy it could fit with that protocol

The argument from the media organisations that went along with it was that this was in essence what they had sort of done.

No, and it’s not true. I am certainly aware that the basis of the discussion was: if you do not sign up to this he will not go, we will not deploy. Therefore the media suddenly became charged with a role in the deployment of a soldier to Afghanistan, which seemed a most bizarre position to be in.

This was propaganda, this was not journalism, this was not ferreting about to get at the truth, this was doing somebody else’s bidding, this was the picture that the Ministry of Defence and others wanted put across the front pages of the newspapers, this was a hole in one for the Palace, the military authorities and Prince Harry, there was no journalism involved at all, not one element of it.

The media, certainly the BBC, who were in this like everyone else, would dispute that, they would say that the quality of access, that one of the reasons that the deal took some time to stitch together was that arguments over – it appears to me anyway, they appear to be saying – the quality and amount and depth of access, so they are saying that the access enabled them to tell more of the story, to let listeners and viewers see more of what is really going on in Afghanistan because of the access they got because of the deal they had done.

That’s complete garbage, isn’t it.

Do you think…?

Absolute garbage. What was going on? What was going on was a number of posed photographs. Did they say: “We moved around the village and Harry posed on a motorbike. Whose it was we don’t know, it was red, it was probably nicked from some Afghan.”

What was the truth? Does an air traffic controller actually shoot from a machine gun nest? The BBC didn’t reveal this to us.

No, this was a series of manipulated photo-opportunities, it was not journalism and did not in any sense describe what was going on in Afghanistan.

Were you surprised at the reaction to your comments?

Not remotely. Not remotely. Do you think 400 editors who have sold their souls for a mess of pottage are in some way going to start being nice to me about my one lone voice of rebellion? No, absolutely not.

But I know I was right. And I have to tell you, I have had a vast mailbag from editors, friends, journalists, other people saying: “Spot on mate” – and viewers too.

Has it done the prince any good?

I think it’s done the press a lot of harm. Has it done the prince any good? Of course. Of course it’s a much better image than someone rolling around in the street half drunk.


Have Your Say: Jon Snow: “Editors sold their souls” to MoD
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report here.

3 Responses to “Jon Snow: “Editors sold their souls” to MoD”

  1. Kline0
    Posted: Sep 26th, 2008 at 8:53 pm

    This is an interesting story . Good on Jon Snow for speaking his mind . The fact that the media ‘The Whole Mass Media’ could have been brought into this is very telling indeed . A matter of public security , maybe . But then again all the coverage was or as Jon Snow seem to imply ‘It was staged’ ! . Maybe he went maybe he was in the Gobi Dessert who will ever know for sure ? . But the importent issue here is the ‘Secrecy’ ! . If the ‘Mass Media’ can be ‘Told What They Can Or Cannot Say’ , whether this be true or fiction , then what else are they being told to tell us . Maybe nothing . But i smell a rat . Don’t you ? .

    Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

  2. S
    Posted: Sep 27th, 2008 at 5:58 am

    I suppose killing Diana isn’t enough for some people.

    Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

  3. Mad Boffin
    Posted: Oct 9th, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    Would you put your valuables in your garden for someone to steel?

    So, do you suppose the Queen would allow Prince Harry to be put in real danger? So why do they spend millions on security?

    This is my hypothesis: The MOD was not for letting Prince Harry go into a real danger zone, but he insisted. As far as Prince Harry is concerned he has actually been to Afghanistan etc, but in reality the MOD dropped him off at a safe location, told him and his boys they were in Afganistan, paid locals to play their rolls and basically had him attacked by “FAKE” warlords whilst he was there.

    Notice the real troops have to hide behind shit loads of barricades and all sorts of protection, yet Prince Harry was playing on a motorbike out in the open.

    Do you suppose if it really was a danger zone ANY troops would be mucking about out in the open?

    My hypothesis is the whole lot was just a publicity SCAM from start to END. Notice how Prince Harry’s team have not even got a scratch?

    All Prince Harry was, was the cheese for the mousetrap to con British troops into putting themselves in danger.

    Can you ever imagine the Royal Family or MOD ever letting one of the Royals be in danger of being held for ransom with some toe rag cutting off a finger a day until they get the 60 million ransom paid?

    NO - it could NEVER happen or even be allowed to come close!

    So, yet again we have been deceived once proper scrutiny is employed - What a right ROYAL Family of RATS!

    Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

RSS TrackBack URL


Related News

This entry was posted on Friday, September 26th, 2008 at 7:48 pm and is filed under Contributions & Guests . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Go to Forum | Latest Topics

Forum

Network This Report

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Fark
  • Netscape
  • Furl

Email This Page To A Friend
Latest Headlines

RINF Advertising Archive
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS
LATEST FORUM TOPICS
Rallies to protest Gaza bombing

Why You Should Delete Your MySpace Account

Private firm may track all email and calls

An Israeli War Crimes Tribunal

Holly commented on:
Rallies to protest Gaza bombing
Peter - you are an individual who has obviously suffered from a brutal loveless upbringing. You have the same...
Continue Reading & Reply

Dan Dare commented on:
The Qassam rockets myths
Phil (Jan 5th, 2009 at 12:08 am) wrote: “in the military here in the United States we are taught be sure of...
Continue Reading & Reply

Dan Dare commented on:
Private firm may track all email and calls
JacquiBoot Smith is a Nazi Bitch who wants to lock everything down under a risk aversive,...
Continue Reading & Reply

Andrew David Taylor commented on:
Anthrax Coverup: A Government Insider Speaks Out
To. Congressman Bob Goodlatte From: Andrew David Taylor, 789 North Augusta...
Continue Reading & Reply

Activism & Protest News | Business News | Civil & Human Rights News | Environmental News | Media News | Globalisation News | Web Development News
ADVERTISEMENTS
SITE MAPS
Web Desing & Hosting UK , USA, Europe

WOWEB - Web Design

FAST GATEWAY - Web Hosting

INFOTX - Web Hosting Guides and Resources


ASHLEY GUEST HOUSE - Morecambe Guest House


Skin up marijuana cannabis weed forum
Linux Web Hosting

Never Be Lied To Again!

Subliminal Secrets Exposed

Holographic Creation: Your Own Reality


Masonic Secrets Revealed


What You Aren't Supposed To Know


Conspiracy DVDs Cheap DVDs
Debt Consolidation
7/7 Activism News Afghanistan Alternative-Energy Art Barack Obama BBC Big-Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CCTV Censorship CIA Climate-Change Cover-Up Cults Culture Database-State David-Hicks David-Ray-Griffin Debt Democrats Demos Drugs Education Entertainment Environmental News EU False-Flag FBI Fraud Free-Speech Freemasons G8 Global-News Global-News Globalization Guantanamo Health-News History ID-Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel John McCain Law Marches Media News MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons New World Order NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police-State Political News Propaganda Reviews RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Science & Technology News Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spy Spying Stephen-Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony-Blair Torture TV UK-News UN USA- USA-News Video Voting war War & Terrorism News Warfare Web Development News White-House Wolfowitz World_News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version
About | DVD Store | Opinion | Reviews | Special Guests | Webmasters
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster.
RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum