World News 世界新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | Global News 環球財經 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭與恐怖主義的新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁 | |
|
Is Paulson’s Plan Mysterious or Non-Existent?是保爾森的計劃神秘的或不存在? Monday, November 3rd, 2008 星期一, 2008年十一月3日 By通過 Philip Mattera菲利普Mattera | Those who regard Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s bailout program as a step toward socialism should remember that such a system involves not just government ownership but also some degree of centralized economic planning.這些方面誰財政部長保爾森的救助計劃的一個步驟走向社會主義應該記住,這樣的系統不僅涉及政府所有製,而且有某種程度的中央經濟規劃。 With all the twists and turns in Paulson’s actions, it is difficult to determine whether he is indeed trying to guide some aspects of US business but is doing so in a way we mere mortals cannot understand.所有的波折,保爾森的行動,很難確定他是否確實是試圖引導某些方面的業務,但美國這樣做是一種方式,我們凡人無法理解。 Especially puzzling is Treasury’s approach to deciding which banks should receive capital infusions.尤其令人費解的是財政部的辦法,決定哪些銀行應得到資本輸注。 It was no surprise that the first $125 billion went to nine of the country’s largest financial institutions, since Paulson believes that shoring up the big guys is key to restoring stability to the system.這是毫不奇怪的是第一個1250億美元到9個國家的最大的金融機構,因為保爾森認為,支撐大個子的關鍵是恢復穩定的系統。 But when he then turned to regional banks for smaller injections, it was unclear why some were on the list and others were not (at least not yet).但是,當他接著區域銀行為小針,目前還不清楚為什麼一些人的名單和其他人沒有(至少是尚未) 。 As Fortune作為財富 points out指出 , Paulson seems to have deliberately omitted Cleveland’s National City Bank (which is now being sold to PNC) because of its precarious portfolio of bad home loans, but he included similarly situated ones such as Milwaukee’s Marshall & Isley.保爾森似乎故意忽略克里夫蘭騎士隊的國家城市銀行(目前正在出售給民警) ,因為它不穩定的組合住房貸款不好,但他列入類似情況的的如雄鹿隊的Marshall & Isley 。 Now that Paulson, under pressure, is現在,保爾森的壓力下,是 reportedly據報導, planning to extend the capital program to privately held banks, whose finances are less transparent, it will be more difficult to figure out if there is rhyme or reason to Treasury’s picks.計劃擴大資本計劃,私人控股的銀行,其財務透明度較低,這將是比較難確定是否有押韻或理由財政部的選秀權。 Paulson was so lackadaisical in structuring the bailout that the banks getting the federal investments did not hesitate to signal that they would use the funds保爾森是如此懶散的結構紓困,銀行獲得的聯邦投資毫不猶豫地信號,他們將利用這筆資金 not to make loans不提供貸款 but rather to finance acquisitions and continue paying out而是收購資金,並繼續支付 dividends紅利 and probably big executive bonuses. Presumably responding to criticism from other quarters, ranging from members of Congress to the也許大行政獎金。推測回應批評,其他四分之三,從國會議員的 United Steelworkers美國鋼鐵 , some banks are一些銀行 promising希望 that they will take steps to ease the credit crunch.他們將採取措施緩解信貸緊縮的情況。 Yet it is unlikely these limited gestures will be enough to shore up a financial system that grows weaker by the day.然而,這是不可能這些有限的姿態將有足夠支撐的金融體系生長較弱的一天。 So, are things going according to Paulson’s plan—or is there no real plan but simply an ad hoc set of measures that desperately seek to prevent a collapse?那麼,事情根據保爾森的計劃或者是有沒有真正的計劃,而只是一個特設的一套措施,拼命設法阻止崩潰? Paulson seems to want it both ways.保爾森似乎想兩者兼得。 He is willing to push through an unprecedented partial nationalization of banks but is unwilling to use that investment to pressure banks to put the public interest before their selfish objectives (which now means lending as little as possible in a enervated economy).他願意推動了前所未有的部分銀行國有化,但也不願使用,投資銀行的壓力,使公共利益之前,其自私的目標(目前是指貸款盡可能少的enervated經濟) 。 We end up with a bizarre form of socialism in which firms get government investment but continue doing what they damn well please.我們結束了一個奇怪的社會主義形式的公司在其中得到政府投資,而且繼續做他們該死的也請。 While Paulson would like to be seen as the mastermind of a brilliant rescue plan, he may be, like the individual Dorothy and her friends discover is frantically manipulating a bunch of levers behind a curtain in Oz, just not a very good wizard.雖然保爾森要被視為主謀輝煌拯救計劃,他可能會像個人多蘿西和她的朋友發現是瘋狂地操縱一群槓桿窗簾後面的綠野仙踪,只是沒有一個很好的嚮導。 Note: Since Treasury has been slow to announce all the banks receiving capital infusions, the investigative website ProPublica is filling the void with its own running注:由於財政部一直緩慢地宣布所有銀行獲得資本注入,調查網站ProPublica是填補空白與自身運行 list清單 compiled with information from other sources.彙編與其他來源的資料。 Have Your Say: Is Paulson’s Plan Mysterious or Non-Existent? 你說:難道保爾森的計劃神秘的或不存在? Please read our請仔細閱讀我們的 posting guidelines before posting張貼在發布前的指導方針 . 。 Alternatively或者 you can discuss this report here你可以討論這份報告在這裡 . 。 3 Responses to “Is Paulson’s Plan Mysterious or Non-Existent?”三答复“是保爾森的計劃神秘的或不存在的? ”
Related News 相關新聞
| US elections may face voting problems美國大選投票可能面臨的問題 Last post by Unregistered @ 10:48 AM 上次未註冊後@上午10時48分 Go to Forum進入論壇 | Latest Topics最新的話題 523 Architects, Engineers & Physicists question the official 911 story Euro tour 523建築師,工程師和物理學家問題的官方911歐元的故事訪問 Last post by Mick @ 09:55 AM 最後職位米克@上午09時55分 UK councils: no Latin lovers英國議會:沒有拉丁情人 Last post by ZingPao @ 03:40 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午3時40 Destroying free and fair elections - state by state摧毀自由和公正的選舉-國家國有 Last post by Knight of the Word @ 03:16 AM 最後的騎士後的Word @上午3點16 In the Nano Technological Future, Sabrina is no Longer Merely Sabrina.在納米技術的未來,薩布麗娜是不再僅僅薩布麗娜。 Last post by Knight of the Word @ 03:04 AM 最後的騎士後的Word @上午03點04 History and high anxiety as Campaign '08 closes歷史和高焦慮系列'08關閉 Last post by ZingPao @ 02:28 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午02時28分 Fact Check: The myths that wouldn't go away事實上檢查:該神話不會消失 Last post by ZingPao @ 02:15 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午02時一刻 Unruly children to be punished with 'innovative' foot massages不軌的兒童將受到懲罰與創新的'腳按摩 Last post by ZingPao @ 02:11 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午2點11分 Obama vs. McCain: Progressive Voter Guide to Drug Issues奧巴馬與麥凱恩:逐步選民指南毒品問題 Last post by ZingPao @ 01:55 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午1點55分 Supercomputer tackles climate change超級計算機處理氣候變化 Last post by Unregistered @ 01:29 AM 上次未註冊後@上午01時29分 ![]() Email This Page To A Friend 本頁發送給朋友 Latest Headlines 最新的頭條
More更多 World News世界新聞 Archive 存檔
|
About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD商店 | | Opinion 意見 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員 |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 中表達的意見RINF新聞電線和通訊是唯一的責任作者( s )和不一定反映意見的管理員。 RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. RINF.COM :打破新聞和其他媒體的版權-複製及分發自由。 News Forum 新聞論壇 |
Henry Paulson and Goldman Sachs:亨利保爾森和高盛:
Scattered from California to New York: The judgments from the Department of Labor, tax liens against 401-K plans, state tax liens, mechanics lien, judgments from other companies散亂從加州到紐約:該判決從勞工部的,稅務留置權對401 - K報表計劃,國家稅收留置權,力學留置權,判決從其他公司
webofdeception.com