Spy Blog間諜博客 | The House of Lords has voted to accept a minor Opposition Amendment regarding the removal of innocent people’s DNA profiles, human tissue samples and fingerprints from centralised Government database, during the first part of the Report stage of the controversial |上議院已投票接受未成年人反對修訂關於取消無辜的人的DNA圖譜，人體組織樣本和指紋政府從中央數據庫，在報告第一部分階段的爭議 Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008反恐怖主義法案2008年

See the debate and the vote:見的辯論和表決： Tuesday, 4 November 2008 Counter-Terrorism Bil星期二， 08年11月4日反恐怖主義膽紅素

The wording of the amendment:的措辭修改：

“National guidelines on fingerprint and sample database(1) The Secretary of State shall by regulations publish national guidelines for governmental agencies establishing– “國家準則指紋和範例資料庫（ 1 ）國務卿不得發布國家規定的準則建立的政府機構，

(a) a procedure by which a person can request a statement of what information relating to fingerprints and samples is held on them or on a dependent; （ a ）一個程序，一個人可以要求一份聲明中哪些有關資料和樣品的指紋是他們舉行或依賴;

(b) a procedure by which a person can request that such information held on them or a dependent is destroyed （ b ）一個程序，一個人可以要求舉行此類信息對他們或依賴被摧毀

(c) the circumstances in which a request under paragraph (b) may be refused. （三）在何種情況下要求（ b ）款規定可能被拒絕。

(2) If a request made under paragraph (1)(b) is refused under paragraph (1)(c), the relevant agency shall write to the person setting out why such information will not be destroyed and when such circumstances as prevent it being destroyed may no longer apply. （ 2 ）如果提出的要求，根據第（ 1 ） （ b ）款被拒絕根據第（ 1 ） （ c ）項，有關機構應寫信給人確定了，為什麼這種信息將不會被摧毀，在這種情況下，防止它被摧毀可能不再適用。

(3) In drawing up guidelines under subsection (1), the Secretary of State shall consult such bodies as he thinks appropriate. （ 3 ）在制定準則根據第（ 1 ） ，國務秘書應進行協商，這些機構認為適當的。

(4) Regulations under subsection (1) shall not be made until a draft copy is laid before, and approved by resolution of, both Houses of Parliament.” （ 4 ）規例根據第（ 1 ）不得，直到草案副本提交，並經決議，議會兩院。 “

Given that there are no penalties for any bureaucrats or politicians who refuse to comply, or who deliberately delay this process, it is unlikely that any such new regulations will make any practical difference.鑑於沒有處罰任何行政官員或政治家誰拒絕遵守，或誰蓄意拖延這一進程，這是不可能，任何這樣的新條例將作出任何實際的差異。

The Government could simply copy the existing ACPO Guidelines, which make it as hard as possible for innocent people to have their DNA profiles and samples and fingerprints, removed.政府可以照搬現有的ACPO準則，這使得像可能無辜的人有他們的DNA圖譜和樣品和指紋，刪除。

The only positive aspect of this wording “national guidelines for governmental agencies ” is general enough so that it is not restricted to just the sneaky Counter-Terrorism DNA Database, run by the Metropolitan Police Service, which is what is under “clarification” in this part of the Bill, but it applies to all Government and Police DNA and fingerprint databases, including the controversial National DNA Databases.唯一積極的方面，這一措辭“國家準則的政府機構”是一般足以使這是不局限於僅僅是狡猾的反恐怖主義DNA數據庫，由警視廳服務，而這一點正是根據“澄清”在這本條例草案，但它適用於所有的政府和警方的DNA和指紋數據庫，包括有爭議的全國DNA數據庫。