Spy Blog间谍博客 | The House of Lords has voted to accept a minor Opposition Amendment regarding the removal of innocent people’s DNA profiles, human tissue samples and fingerprints from centralised Government database, during the first part of the Report stage of the controversial |上议院已投票接受未成年人反对修订关于取消无辜的人的DNA图谱，人体组织样本和指纹政府从中央数据库，在报告第一部分阶段的争议 Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008反恐怖主义法案2008年

See the debate and the vote:见的辩论和表决： Tuesday, 4 November 2008 Counter-Terrorism Bil星期二， 08年11月4日反恐怖主义胆红素

The wording of the amendment:的措辞修改：

“National guidelines on fingerprint and sample database(1) The Secretary of State shall by regulations publish national guidelines for governmental agencies establishing– “国家准则指纹和范例资料库（ 1 ）国务卿不得发布国家规定的准则建立的政府机构，

(a) a procedure by which a person can request a statement of what information relating to fingerprints and samples is held on them or on a dependent; （ a ）一个程序，一个人可以要求一份声明中哪些有关资料和样品的指纹是他们举行或依赖;

(b) a procedure by which a person can request that such information held on them or a dependent is destroyed （ b ）一个程序，一个人可以要求举行此类信息对他们或依赖被摧毁

(c) the circumstances in which a request under paragraph (b) may be refused. （三）在何种情况下要求（ b ）款规定可能被拒绝。

(2) If a request made under paragraph (1)(b) is refused under paragraph (1)(c), the relevant agency shall write to the person setting out why such information will not be destroyed and when such circumstances as prevent it being destroyed may no longer apply. （ 2 ）如果提出的要求，根据第（ 1 ） （ b ）款被拒绝根据第（ 1 ） （ c ）项，有关机构应写信给人确定了，为什么这种信息将不会被摧毁，在这种情况下，防止它被摧毁可能不再适用。

(3) In drawing up guidelines under subsection (1), the Secretary of State shall consult such bodies as he thinks appropriate. （ 3 ）在制定准则根据第（ 1 ） ，国务秘书应进行协商，这些机构认为适当的。

(4) Regulations under subsection (1) shall not be made until a draft copy is laid before, and approved by resolution of, both Houses of Parliament.” （ 4 ）规例根据第（ 1 ）不得，直到草案副本提交，并经决议，议会两院。 “

Given that there are no penalties for any bureaucrats or politicians who refuse to comply, or who deliberately delay this process, it is unlikely that any such new regulations will make any practical difference.鉴于没有处罚任何行政官员或政治家谁拒绝遵守，或谁蓄意拖延这一进程，这是不可能，任何这样的新条例将作出任何实际的差异。

The Government could simply copy the existing ACPO Guidelines, which make it as hard as possible for innocent people to have their DNA profiles and samples and fingerprints, removed.政府可以照搬现有的ACPO准则，这使得像可能无辜的人有他们的DNA图谱和样品和指纹，删除。

The only positive aspect of this wording “national guidelines for governmental agencies ” is general enough so that it is not restricted to just the sneaky Counter-Terrorism DNA Database, run by the Metropolitan Police Service, which is what is under “clarification” in this part of the Bill, but it applies to all Government and Police DNA and fingerprint databases, including the controversial National DNA Databases.唯一积极的方面，这一措辞“国家准则的政府机构”是一般足以使这是不局限于仅仅是狡猾的反恐怖主义DNA数据库，由警视厅服务，而这一点正是根据“澄清”在这本条例草案，但它适用于所有的政府和警方的DNA和指纹数据库，包括有争议的全国DNA数据库。