RINF.COM: EL ALTERNATIVA DE LAS NOTICIAS QUE SE ROMPE

Sábado 7 de junio de 2008
Foro de RINF
Romper noticias | Foro | Noticias BRITÁNICAS | Noticias de los E.E.U.U. | Noticias del mundo | Noticias políticas | Noticias del Sci-Tech | Noticias de la guerra y del terrorismo | Noticias de los deportes | Multimedias | Fije el homepage
ROMPER NOTICIAS
¡FORO NUEVO DE RINF!

¿Las primeras muestras del “gas máximo”?

Sábado 7 de junio de 2008

gas.jpgPor Andy Rowell | Consumidores que el excedente del mundo está comenzando a protestar contra los precios enormes de la gasolina están pagando en la bomba. Pero mientras que el mundo va loco sobre los precios del petróleo, allí se están preocupando muestras de qué está sucediendo en el mercado del gas que podría también deletrear desastre.

Pero es el precio del petróleo que está atrayendo actualmente toda la atención. El mes pasado, Presidente indonesio Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono pospuso una visita oficial a Europa en medio de protestas a nivel nacional contra aumentos de los precios de combustible.  En Europa, Francés pescadores continuados para bloquear varios estratégicos puertos, mientras que sus contrapartes adentro España y protestas también amenazadas de Portugal.

En el Reino Unido, los camioneros convergieron en Londres para pedir una reducción en deber del combustible, mientras que Minster primero Gordon Brown negociaciones urgentes llevadas a cabo con la industria de petróleo. Encima en América, el precio del petróleo fue dicho para haber forzado a muchas compañías que acarreaban al borde de la bancarrota.

Pero como el aceite continúa asomando apenas bajo niveles de registro, hay advertencias diarias que los días del aceite barato han ido por siempre y el precio del aceite puede pronto ser $150 o aún $200 por barril por el año próximo.

Hay también un discusión diario en cuanto a qué está causando realmente estos precios sin precedentes. Un número de aumento de voces influyentes está diciendo que no tiene nada hacer con la fuente real de aceite sino que está abajo a los especuladores que explotan el mercado volátil.

La OPEP, que está bajo fuego de muchos comentaristas para no aumentar  la producción más, discute que el mercado ya esté proveído adecuadamente y que $35 por el barril del aumento reciente se pueden colocar a la especulación.

Otras voces convienen, por ejemplo Jeroen van der Ver, cabeza del gigante global del aceite, Shell, que discute que los precios del petróleo de registro sean debido al “sentimiento del mercado” más bien que a una escasez de fuente. “Qué decimos y qué vemos somos allí no somos ninguna escasez física,” él dice. “Allí no hay petroleros que esperan en el Oriente Medio, allí no son ningún coche que espera en las estaciones de la gasolina porque están hacia fuera - de - acción. Esto tiene que hacer con psicología en los mercados y usted no puede pronosticar la psicología.”

His view is shared by George Soros, the multi-billion dollar financier, known as the man who nearly “broke the Bank of England”, in the early nineties. Soros argues that it is financial speculators that are largely responsible for driving the crude oil price. “Speculation… is increasingly affecting the price,” he said. “The price has this parabolic shape which is characteristic of bubbles,” he said.

Political action on speculators is increasing. Last week a senior German politician proposed a worldwide ban on oil trading by speculators. Uwe Beckmeyer, the head of transport for the Social Democratic party, the junior partner in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ruling coalition, argued that the recent 25 per cent rise in oil price had nothing to do with underlying supply and demand. “It’s pure speculation,” he said, adding that his party would be calling for joint measures by the G8 to prohibit leveraged trading on energy contracts.

Also last week, in America, Senator Jeff Bingaman, the chairman of the influential  Senate Energy Committee, asked the top futures market regulator in the US, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, for more information about how much impact speculation was having on the oil futures market. Bingamen then complained he had been given “glaringly incomplete” data by the CFTC,  which argued that speculative trading was not to blame for recent price rises.

If speculation is not to blame, what is? Some argue that it is the weak dollar. Steve Hanke, professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University in the US argues that “Twenty-five percent of the increase in oil prices is strictly due to the fact that the dollar has gone down by 25 percent, because oil all over the world is priced in dollars.”

However, others are now arguing that the high oil price is down to good old simple economics. Demand has outstripped supply over the last couple of years and so the price has increased, on the back of roaring demand, especially from China and the Middle East. “The high-priced energy environment is being driven by the fact that demand has outstripped supply,” President George Bush’s Energy Secretary, Samuel Bodman, said this month: “We have sopped up all the available spare oil production capacity in the system.”

Others concur. One of the authoritative arbiters of how much oil there is the International Energy Agency, that is currently in the middle of its first attempt to comprehensively assess the condition of the world’s top 400 oil fields.  Although the findings will not be published until November, according to the Wall Street Journal the IEA is “preparing a sharp downward revision of its oil-supply forecast, a shift that reflects deepening pessimism over whether oil companies can keep abreast of booming demand.”

Fatih Birol, the International Energy Agency’s chief economist, said the oil industry had entered “a new energy world order” where it was harder to keep supply and demand in equilibrium. “What has happened in the last few years has not been in line with economic theory,” he says.

For years the IEA predicted that supplies of crude would gently increase in line with demand increasing to some 117 million barrels per day by 2030. But not anymore. Buried in the IEA website are figures that up the theory that the supply of oil is in real trouble. Since the beginning of 2004, oil’s price has gone from $33 per barrel to over $130 per barrel. In the same period, demand has increased by some 4.3 million barrels per day to 86.5 million barrels per day, whereas supply has increased by only 2.2 million barrels per day to 85.6 million. Supply is already struggling to keep up with demand, let alone reach over 100 million barrels a day.

The bottom line is that demand is now outstripping supply, giving credence to the peak oil pundits that the days of cheap oil over, and the global economy could be heading for a nasty shock.  

See More: 

Have Your Say: The First Signs of “Peak Gas”?
Please note, only selected comments will be published.

Or discuss this report in our new forums

2 Responses to “The First Signs of “Peak Gas”?”

  1. pingback:
    Posted: Jun 7th, 2008 at 4:44 am | Link to this

    The First Signs of “Peak Gas”? | Mining Exploration Investment News

    […] The bottom line is that demand is now outstripping supply, giving credence to the peak oil pundits that the days of cheap oil over, and the global economy could be heading for a nasty shock. This article taken from rinf.com […]

    Reply

  2. Joe
    Posted: Jun 7th, 2008 at 7:05 am | Link to this

    It seems to me that there is a thin line separating what we term “investment” from “speculation.” So far, I see a lot of calls for controlling speculation but no definitions of what “speculation” really is. Without a clear definition, which would also help decide whether it was good, bad, or neutral to the business cycle, there is no point in attacking this activity.

    My own understanding is that one of the differences between speculation and investments is the time factor: speculators are merely short-term investors. How short term - there is no absolute rule since all investments differ.

    In the wild west there were oil, gold, and even water speculators. They were simply investors with shorter time horizons than today’s pension fund investors. What if someone buys shares of a new company to hold for the long term, feeling certain its growth will be positive in the long run, but soon discovers a lot of competitors entering the industry. What if they heard that one of the company’s patents got rejected? And what if the investor changed his mind and quickly sold his stock holdings in the company? Was he a speculator or an investor?

    In my opinion if we conclude that a speculator is no more than a type of investor, then we should quickly forget trying to regulate “speculation.” For without investments, and investor/speculators, the flow of funds, knowledge, and resources could dry up and everyone loses.

    Joe

    Reply

RSS TrackBack URL

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 7th, 2008 at 12:30 am and is filed under General . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Translations
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish Free Newsletter

Related News

Network This Report

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Spurl
  • Fark
  • Netscape

Email This Page To A Friend
Latest Headlines

Archive
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS
LATEST FORUM TOPICS
Site Broken? Hacked? Abducted?

EU-wide ID card scheme could use mobile phones

The First Signs of "Peak Gas"?

US Paying Allies to Fight War in Iraq

Howard accused of war crimes

Joe commented on:
The First Signs of “Peak Gas”?
It seems to me that there is a thin line separating what we term “investme nt” from...
Continue Reading & Reply

Mick Meaney commented on:
Site Broken? Hacked? Abducted?
It’s kind of ok now, forum is back up, no posts missing. Have FTP access again but there is a PHP...
Continue Reading & Reply

Ken Williamson commented on:
A McCain Presidency Guarantees a Military Draft?
Very good point. I agree 100%. I wrote on www.posterspost .com about McCain’s...
Continue Reading & Reply

Jon commented on:
Students Denied Legal Aid
Timotei.. come on after the first line you should have sensed a bit of sarcasm.. you give students like me and the...
Continue Reading & Reply

RSS Forum Posts Temp Offline - See Latest Forum Posts
Activism & Protest News | Business News | Civil & Human Rights News | Environmental News | Media News | Globalisation News | Web Development News
ADVERTISEMENTS
SITE MAPS
WOWEB - Web Design

FAST GATEWAY - Web Hosting

INFOTX - Web Hosting Guides and Resources


ASHLEY GUEST HOUSE - Morecambe Guest House

Never Be Lied To Again!

Subliminal Secrets Exposed

Holographic Creation: Your Own Reality


Masonic Secrets Revealed


What You Aren't Supposed To Know
7/7 Afghanistan Alternative Energy Art BBC Big Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CIA Climate Change Cover Up Cults Culture Database State David Hicks David Ray Griffin Democrats Demos Drugs Education EU False Flag FBI Fraud Free Speech Freemasons G8 Globalization Guantanamo Health News History ID Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel Law Marches MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police State Propaganda RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Secrecy Security Space Sports Spying Stephen Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony Blair Torture TV UK News UN USA News Video Voting Warfare White House Wolfowitz World News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version
About | DVD Store | Opinion | Reviews | Special Guests | Webmasters
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster.
RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum