Breaking News 突發新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭和恐怖主義新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁

BREAKING NEWS 突發新聞

Saturday, June 7th, 2008 週六， 2008年6月7日

By通過 Stephen Lendman - RINF斯蒂芬lendman -r inf | Reports keep surfacing about new threats against Hugo Chavez. |報告不斷湧現新的威脅對烏戈查韋斯。 Given past ones, they can’t be taken lightly.鑑於過去的，他們不能掉以輕心。 Chavez is alerted and reacts accordingly.查韋斯是提高警覺和反應。 Case in point: revamping Venezuela’s decades old intelligence services.典型的例子：改造委內瑞拉的幾十年的舊情報服務。 It’s long overdue and urgently needed given the Bush administration’s tenure winding down and its determination in its remaining months to end the Bolivarian project and crush its participatory democracy.它的早該和急需鑑於布什政府的任期內清盤下來，並決心在其剩餘的幾個月，年底玻利瓦爾計劃，並粉碎其參與性民主制度。

CIA, NED, IRI, USAID and other US elements infest the country and are more active than ever.美國中央情報局，非執行董事，以及IRI ，美國國際開發署和其他美國元素infest國家和更積極比以往任何時候都。 Subversion is their strategy, and it shows up everywhere.顛覆罪是他們的戰略，它表明了無處不在。 Violence is being encouraged.暴力是被鼓勵的。 Opposition groups are recruited and funded.反對派團體是招募和資助。 So are members of Venezuela’s military.因此，成員委內瑞拉的軍事。 Student groups as well and anti-Chavista candidates for November’s mayoral and gubernatorial elections.學生團體，以及和反chavista候選人11月的市長和州長選舉。

The dominant media are on board in Venezuela and America.佔主導地位的媒體是在船上，在委內瑞拉和美國。 They assail Chavez relentlessly and are on the warpath again after his May 28 announced intelligence services changes.他們assail查韋斯無情，並就再次warpath後，他5月28日宣布，情報服務的變化。 The Interior and Justice Ministries will oversee a new General Intelligence Office and Counterintelligence Office in place of the current Directorate of Intelligence and Prevention Services (DISIP).內政和司法部將負責監督一個新的情報總局辦公室和反辦公室在取代現行的首長級人員的情報和預防服務（情報和） 。 Similar military intelligence and counterintelligence components will replace the Military Intelligence Division (DIM) and will be under the Defense Ministry.類似的軍事情報和反間諜組件將取代軍事情報部（黯淡） ，並將於下，國防部。 Why was it done and why now?為什麼這樣做和為什麼現在呢？ To counter stepped up US espionage and destabilization efforts when it’s most needed.為了對付加強了美國的間諜活動和不穩定的努力時，它的最需要的地方。

New tools will be used and current personnel retrained and vetted for their Bolivarian commitment.新的工具將被用於和當前的工作人員再培訓和審核，為他們的玻利瓦爾的承諾。 DISIP and DIM are outdated.情報和和暗淡是過時的。 They’ve been around since 1969 to serve the “capitalist vision” of that era.他們一直在周圍自1969年以來，服務“資本主義視野”的那個時代。 Ever since, they’ve been “notoriously repressive” and closely aligned with the CIA.自那時以來，他們已經“眾所周知，鎮壓” ，並密切配合中央情報局。 Therein lies the problem.這就是問題。 Chavez intends to fix it.查韋斯打算解決它。 The dominant media reacted.佔主導地位的媒體反應。 They’re hostile to change and showed it their reports.他們敵視的變化，並表明它自己的報告。

The New York Times’ Simon Romero has trouble with his facts.新紐約時報西蒙羅梅羅有麻煩，與他的事實。 He headlined “Chavez Decree Tightens Hold on Intelligence.” He referred to the new Law on Intelligence and Counterintelligence that passed by presidential decree under the legislatively-granted enabling law.他標題為“查韋斯舉行法令加強對情報”他所指的新的法律情報和反情報說，通過總統法令下，立法授予的授權法。 He failed to explain that the 1969 law passed the same way, and that Venezuela’s Constitution then and now permit it.他未能解釋說， 1969年通過的法律同樣的方式，和委內瑞拉的憲法，當時和現在的許可證。

Instead, he noted a “fierce backlash here from (mostly unnamed) human rights groups and ‘legal scholars’ who say the measures will force citizens to inform on one another to avoid prison terms….The new law requires (them) to….assist the agencies, secret police or community activist groups loyal to Mr. Chavez.相反，他指出， “在激烈的反彈，從這裡（大多未命名）人權團體和法律學者說，誰的措施將迫使公民告知對一的另一個，以避免刑期… … 。新的法律要求（他們） … … 。協助機構，秘密警察或社會活動家群體忠於查韋斯先生。 Refusal can result in prison terms of two to four years (and up to) six years for government employees.”拒絕的結果，可以在監獄服刑的2至4年（最長）六年的政府僱員“ 。

Once again, Romero falls short on credibility.再次，羅梅羅屬於短期的可信度。 Hyperbole substitutes for truth as in all his reports.誇張的替代品為真理而作為在他的所有報告。 No country more respects human rights than Venezuela, and Chavez is committed to them.任何國家都更尊重人權，超過委內瑞拉，查韋斯承諾給他們。 To the rule of law as well and social justice.以法治以及和社會正義。 The country’s Constitution mandates it, and government officials are bound by it.該國的憲法的任務，和政府官員的約束。 Appointed officials with other aims have no place in it.任命的官員與其他的目的，有沒有地方在它。 They need to be exposed and replaced but need fear no recrimination unless they violate the law.他們需要加以揭露和取代，但需要恐懼，沒有指責，除非他們觸犯法律。

The new one won’t create “a society of informers” as one of Romero’s sources stated.新一將不會創造“社會線人”之一，羅梅羅的消息來源。 Nor will it imprison Venezuelan citizens or let Chavez “assert greater control over public institutions in the face of political challenges following a ’stinging’ defeat in December(’s) constitutional (referendum) that would have expanded his powers.”也不會下獄委內瑞拉公民或讓查韋斯“斷言更大的控制權的公共機構，在面對政治挑戰，繼'刺'失敗，在12月（ ' ）的憲法（公投）表示，將擴大他的權力” 。

It will insure greater “national security” and protect against “imperialist attacks” as Chavez explained.這將保證更大的“國家安全”和防止“帝國主義攻擊”查韋斯解釋。 It’s to preserve Bolivarianism against persistent attempts to destroy it.它的保存bolivarianism對企圖摧毀它。 It’s to serve all Venezuelans, advance a new 21st century vision, and put people ahead of privilege.它的服務，所有的委內瑞拉人，與時俱進，一個新的二十一世紀的願景，並把人民的未來的特權。 It’s to counter Bush administration efforts to restore neoliberalism, return the old order, and destroy social justice in the region’s most model democracy.它的反布什政府的努力，以恢復新自由主義，返回舊秩序，破壞社會公義，在該地區的最民主模式。

Without explaining Venezuelan law or its legislative process, Romero states that the “law (was drafted and passed) behind closed doors, without exposing it to….public debate (and that) contributed to the public uproar and suspicion.” His “public,” of course, are elitists.沒有解釋委內瑞拉法律或其立法過程中，羅梅羅指出， “法（草擬並通過）閉門造車，沒有揭露它… … 。公開辯論（和）的貢獻，向公眾嘩然和猜疑” ，他“公眾， “當然，都是精英。 They target Chavez for removal, denounce all his beneficial changes, and falsely accuse him of governing dictatorially.他們的目標，查韋斯搬遷，譴責他的所有有利的變化，並倒打一耙，他的執政dictatorially 。

“They” claim “justice officials, including judges, are required to actively collaborate with the intelligence services rather than serve as a check on them.” According to Americas director for Human Rights Watch (HRW), Jose Miguel Vivanco: “This is a government that simply doesn’t believe in the separation of powers….(It requires) the country’s judges (to) serve as spies for the government.” Vivanco knows better and damages HRW’s credibility with comments like these. “他們”索賠“司法官員，包括法官，須積極合作與情報服務，而不是充當檢查對他們的影響。 ”據美洲主任，人權觀察組織（人權觀察） ，何塞米格爾維万科： “這是一個政府根本不相信，在權力分立的… … 。 （它要求）該國的法官（ ）充當間諜，為政府“維万科更清楚和損害人權觀察的信譽與評論想這些。 Romero uses them with relish to aid the imperial project.羅梅羅使用他們津津樂道的援助帝國項目。

Venezuela’s internal threat is unmentioned.委內瑞拉的內部威脅是沒有提及。 Rogue elements infest the government and military.無賴分子infest政府和軍隊。 They oppose democracy and social justice.他們反對民主和社會正義。 Washington supports them.華盛頓支持他們。 They must be found and removed.他們必須找到並拆除。 Venezuelans demand it.委內瑞拉人的需求。 Better intelligence will help.更好的情報將有助於。 Romero won’t report it.羅梅羅將不會報告它。 Instead, he inverts truth and sides with forces trying to destabilize and undermine a government of, by and for the people.相反，他顛倒真相和雙方勢力試圖破壞和削弱政府，和為人民謀。

He quotes “a prominent legal scholar” (in fact, right wing lawyer Rocio San Miguel) saying “This is the most scandalous effort to intimidate the population in the 10 years this government has been in power.他的報價“的一個突出的法律學者” （事實上，右翼律師rocio聖米格爾）說： “這是最可恥的努力，以恐嚇民眾，在這10年，政府一直在權力。 Under the new law (information I have) could be considered a threat to national security and I could be sent immediately to jail.” Indeed she could if she violates the law or tries to subvert the government.根據新的法律（資訊我）可被視為對國家安全構成威脅，我可以立即送往監獄。 “事實上，她可以，如果她違反了法律或試圖顛覆政府。 Otherwise, she’s entitled to all benefits and protections Venezuelan law affords everyone.否則，她的題為所有的權益和保護委內瑞拉法律給予每一個人。 No comment from Romero.沒有評論，從羅梅羅。

AP echoed The New Times in its headlined May 31 report: “Venezuelan intelligence law draws protests, seen as potential tool against dissent.” Again, it’s false and misleading and part of the imperial plot against Chavez.鴨呼應新的時代在其標題為5月31日報告說： “委內瑞拉情報依法提請抗議，被視為潛在的工具，對不同政見” 。再次，它的虛假和誤導和部分帝國的陰謀反對查韋斯。 AP unfairly equates the new law to the USA Patriot Act, when, in fact, it’s totally dissimilar.鴨不公平相等於新的法律，向美國愛國者法，當，事實上，它的完全不同。 The US law violates constitutional civil liberties.美國法律違反了憲法公民自由權。 Venezuela’s respects them, but it’s easy for protesters to claim otherwise.委內瑞拉的尊重他們，但很容易為示威者要求，否則。

Justice Minister Ramon Rodriguez Chacin explained the difference.司法部長拉蒙羅德里格斯哈欽解釋的差異。 US law spies on Americans and denies them legal protection.美國的法律，間諜對美國人和否認他們的法律保護。 Venezuela’s law enlists responsible citizen participation in preserving their government.委內瑞拉的法律enlists負責任的公民參與，在維護他們的政府。 They have a stake in “state security and resolving crimes.他們有一個股份， “國家安全和解決的罪行。 If (they) witness (wrongdoing and) hide it, then (they) are an accomplice to that crime.” It doesn’t require people to spy.如果（他們）證人（過失）隱藏它，然後（他們）是共犯，犯罪“ 。它不需要人進行間諜活動。 It wants them to cooperate and be engaged in preserving Bolivarianism and to report threats against it.它要讓他們合作，並參與在維護bolivarianism和報告威脅反對。 It’s to make them responsible citizens united for their common self-interest.它的，使他們有責任感的公民，美國為他們的共同的自我利益。

That’s not how BBC sees it as part of its anti-Chavez agenda.這不是如何英國廣播公司認為它的一部分，其反查韋斯議程。 Its June 3 online report highlighted: “Venezuela ’spy’ law draws protest….among groups who say it threatens civil liberties.” One of them is HRW’s Vivanco again voicing the same false and misleading statements about “judges serving as spies.” Another source, with a clear anti-Chavez agenda, says the “law may be used as a weapon to silence and intimidate the opposition.”其6月3日在線報告突出了： “委內瑞拉'間諜'法提請抗議… … 。集團之間誰說，它威脅到公民自由” ，其中之一就是人權觀察的維万科再次道出了同樣的虛假和誤導的陳述， “法官充當間諜。 “另一個情報來源，與一個明確的反查韋斯的議程，說： ”法律可以用來作為一種武器，以沉默和恐嚇在野黨“ 。

In fact, Chavez champions free expression in all forms unlike in America post-9/11.事實上，在查韋斯冠軍自由表達的一切形式的不同，在美國的9.11 。 Repressive laws and presidential executive orders stifle it.壓制性法律，這些法律和總統行政命令扼殺它。 Activists are targeted, harassed and imprisoned.活動的目標是，騷擾和監禁。 Illegal spying is institutionalized.非法從事間諜活動的制度化。 So are repression, torture and disdain for the rule of law.所以是鎮壓，酷刑和藐視法治。 Where are BBC, AP, The New York Times and other dominant media voices?那裡是英國廣播公司，美聯社，紐約時報和其他媒體的主導聲音？ Why aren’t they exposing police state justice?為什麼他們不揭露警察國家的正義呢？ Instead they denounce democracy, ally with despotism, and acknowledge no hint of hypocrisy.相反，他們譴責民主，與專制主義的盟友，並承認沒有提示的虛偽。

Chavez is mirror opposite his media critics and counters them correctly.查韋斯是一面鏡子，相反，他批評媒體和櫃檯，他們的正確。 He calls the USA Patriot Act “dictatorial law.” In contrast, the new Venezuelan one upholds freedom, seeks to preserve it, and is within “a framework of great respect for human rights.” It will combat US subversion that dominant media sources ignore.他呼籲美國愛國者法“獨裁” 。在此相反，新的委內瑞拉一，堅持自由，旨在維護它，是“一項偉大的框架內對人權的尊重。 ： ”這將打擊美國的傾軋，主導媒體來源忽視。 They blame victims instead and are willing co-conspirators against Venezuela’s model democracy.他們責怪受害者不是，並願意合作，陰謀反對委內瑞拉的民主模式。 Their latest efforts show why Chavez needs all the defense he can marshal against them, and for all the right reasons.他們的最新的努力表明，查韋斯為何需要的所有防禦，他可以對他們的元帥，並為所有的權利的理由。

Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.斯蒂芬lendman是一個研究助理的研究中心的全球化。 He lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.他生活在芝加哥和可達成的lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net 。

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Mondays from 11AM to 1PM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests.也訪問他的博客網站在sjlendman.blogspot.com ，並聽取他們的全球研究新聞小時就republicbroadcasting.org星期一從上午十一時至下午一時，美國中部時間為前沿的討論，與各位嘉賓。 All programs are archived for easy listening.所有程序存檔，方便聽。

See More: 看到更多的： Stephen Lendman 斯蒂芬lendman

Have Your Say: Chavez Revamps His Intelligence Services: The Corporate Media React 你說：查韋斯revamps他的情報服務：企業媒體反應
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。

Or discuss this report in our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的新論壇

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Name (required) 姓名（必填）

Mail (will not be published) (required) 郵件（不會被公佈） （必填）

Website 網站

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 7th, 2008 at 2:22 am and is filed under 此項目被張貼在週六， 2008年6月7日在上午02時22分，並提交下 General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反應，此項目通過 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 餵養。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回應 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 從你自己的網站。

Loading ...載入中...

TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS top新聞討論

LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS 最新消息討論

Activism & Protest News 積極與抗議新聞 | | Business News 商業新聞 | | Civil & Human Rights News 公務員＆人權新聞 | | Environmental News 環境新聞 | | Media News 新聞 | | Globalisation News 全球經濟一體化新聞 | | Web Development News Web開發新聞

ADVERTISEMENTS廣告

SITE MAPS網站地圖

7/7 7 / 7 Afghanistan阿富汗 Alternative Energy替代能源 Art藝術 BBC英國廣播公司 Big Brother大哥哥 Bilderberg 。 Bilderberg Biometrics生物識別技術 Bush布什 CIA美國中央情報局 Climate Change氣候變化 Cover Up掩蓋 Cults邪教 Culture文化 Database State數據庫狀態 David Hicks大衛希克斯 David Ray Griffin朱射線格里芬 Democrats同盟 Demos演示 Drugs藥物 Education教育 EU歐盟 False Flag虛假國旗 FBI美國聯邦調查局 Fraud欺詐 Free Speech免費的講話 Freemasons共濟會 G8八國集團 Globalization全球化 Guantanamo關塔那摩 Health News健康新聞 History歷史 ID Cards身份證 Internet互聯網 Iran伊朗 Iraq伊拉克 Israel以色列 Law法律 Marches遊行 MI5軍情五處 MI6軍情六處 Microsoft微軟 Military軍事 MoD按付款當日價格計算 Money金錢 Music音樂 NASA美國航天局 Neocons新保守主義者 NSA美國國家安全局 Oil石油 Pakistan巴基斯坦 Podcast播客 Police State警察國家 Propaganda宣傳 RFID的RFID RINF rinf Rumsfeld拉姆斯菲爾德 Science科學 Secrecy保密 Security安全 Space空間 Sports體育 Spying諜報活動 Stephen Lendman斯蒂芬lendman Technology技術 Terrorism恐怖主義 Tony Blair托尼布萊爾 Torture酷刑 TV電視 UK News英國新聞 UN聯合國 USA News美國新聞 Video視頻 Voting投票 Warfare戰 White House白宮 Wolfowitz沃爾福威茨 World News世界新聞 Yahoo雅虎
2003 - 2005 Archives 2003 -2 005檔案 | 2005 - 2007 Archives 2005年-2 007年檔案 | 2007 - 2008 Archives 2007 -2 008檔案 | Current Archives目前檔案 | Past Version |過去的版本

About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員