RINF.COM : THE BREAKING NEWS ALTERNATIVE rinf.com :突发新闻的替代 Sunday, June 8th, 2008周日, 2008年6月8日 | ![]() |
Breaking News 突发新闻 | | Forum 论坛 | | UK News 英国新闻 | | USA News 美国新闻 | | World News 世界新闻 | | Political News 政治新闻 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新闻 | | War & Terrorism News 战争和恐怖主义新闻 | | Sports News 体育新闻 | | Multimedia 多媒体 | | Set Homepage 设为首页 | |
BREAKING NEWS 突发新闻 |
Chavez Revamps His Intelligence Services: The Corporate Media React查韦斯revamps他的情报服务:企业媒体反应 Saturday, June 7th, 2008 周六, 2008年6月7日
CIA, NED, IRI, USAID and other US elements infest the country and are more active than ever.美国中央情报局,非执行董事,以及IRI ,美国国际开发署和其他美国元素infest国家和更积极比以往任何时候都。 Subversion is their strategy, and it shows up everywhere.颠覆罪是他们的战略,它表明了无处不在。 Violence is being encouraged.暴力是被鼓励的。 Opposition groups are recruited and funded.反对派团体是招募和资助。 So are members of Venezuela’s military.因此,成员委内瑞拉的军事。 Student groups as well and anti-Chavista candidates for November’s mayoral and gubernatorial elections.学生团体,以及和反chavista候选人11月的市长和州长选举。 The dominant media are on board in Venezuela and America.占主导地位的媒体是在船上,在委内瑞拉和美国。 They assail Chavez relentlessly and are on the warpath again after his May 28 announced intelligence services changes.他们assail查韦斯无情,并就warpath后再次他5月28日宣布,情报服务的变化。 The Interior and Justice Ministries will oversee a new General Intelligence Office and Counterintelligence Office in place of the current Directorate of Intelligence and Prevention Services (DISIP).内政和司法部将负责监督一个新的情报总局办公室和反办公室在取代现行的首长级人员的情报和预防服务(情报和) 。 Similar military intelligence and counterintelligence components will replace the Military Intelligence Division (DIM) and will be under the Defense Ministry.类似的军事情报和反间谍组件将取代军事情报部(黯淡) ,并将于下,国防部。 Why was it done and why now?为什么这样做和为什么现在呢? To counter stepped up US espionage and destabilization efforts when it’s most needed.为了对付加强了美国的间谍活动和不稳定的努力时,它的最需要的地方。 New tools will be used and current personnel retrained and vetted for their Bolivarian commitment.新的工具将被用于和当前的工作人员再培训和审核,为他们的玻利瓦尔的承诺。 DISIP and DIM are outdated.情报和和暗淡是过时的。 They’ve been around since 1969 to serve the “capitalist vision” of that era.他们一直在周围自1969年以来,服务“资本主义视野”的那个时代。 Ever since, they’ve been “notoriously repressive” and closely aligned with the CIA.自那时以来,他们已经“众所周知,镇压” ,并密切配合中央情报局。 Therein lies the problem.这就是问题。 Chavez intends to fix it.查韦斯打算解决它。 The dominant media reacted.占主导地位的媒体反应。 They’re hostile to change and showed it their reports.他们敌视的变化,并表明它自己的报告。 The New York Times’ Simon Romero has trouble with his facts.新纽约时报西蒙罗梅罗有麻烦,与他的事实。 He headlined “Chavez Decree Tightens Hold on Intelligence.” He referred to the new Law on Intelligence and Counterintelligence that passed by presidential decree under the legislatively-granted enabling law.他标题为“查韦斯举行法令加强对情报”他所指的新的法律情报和反情报说,通过总统法令下,立法授予的授权法。 He failed to explain that the 1969 law passed the same way, and that Venezuela’s Constitution then and now permit it.他未能解释说, 1969年通过的法律同样的方式,和委内瑞拉的宪法,当时和现在的许可证。 Instead, he noted a “fierce backlash here from (mostly unnamed) human rights groups and ‘legal scholars’ who say the measures will force citizens to inform on one another to avoid prison terms….The new law requires (them) to….assist the agencies, secret police or community activist groups loyal to Mr. Chavez.相反,他指出, “在激烈的反弹,从这里(大多未命名)人权团体和法律学者说,谁的措施将迫使公民告知对一的另一个,以避免刑期… … 。新的法律要求(他们) … … 。协助机构,秘密警察或社会活动家群体忠于查韦斯先生。 Refusal can result in prison terms of two to four years (and up to) six years for government employees.”拒绝的结果,可以在监狱服刑的2至4年(最长)六年的政府雇员“ 。 Once again, Romero falls short on credibility.再次,罗梅罗属于短期的可信度。 Hyperbole substitutes for truth as in all his reports.夸张的替代品为真理而作为在他的所有报告。 No country more respects human rights than Venezuela, and Chavez is committed to them.任何国家都更尊重人权,超过委内瑞拉,查韦斯承诺给他们。 To the rule of law as well and social justice.以法治以及和社会正义。 The country’s Constitution mandates it, and government officials are bound by it.该国的宪法的任务,和政府官员的约束。 Appointed officials with other aims have no place in it.任命的官员与其他的目的,有没有地方在它。 They need to be exposed and replaced but need fear no recrimination unless they violate the law.他们需要加以揭露和取代,但需要恐惧,没有指责,除非他们触犯法律。 The new one won’t create “a society of informers” as one of Romero’s sources stated.新一将不会创造“社会线人”之一,罗梅罗的消息来源。 Nor will it imprison Venezuelan citizens or let Chavez “assert greater control over public institutions in the face of political challenges following a ’stinging’ defeat in December(’s) constitutional (referendum) that would have expanded his powers.”也不会下狱委内瑞拉公民或让查韦斯“断言更大的控制权的公共机构,在面对政治挑战,继'刺'失败,在12月( ' )的宪法(公投)表示,将扩大他的权力” 。 It will insure greater “national security” and protect against “imperialist attacks” as Chavez explained.这将保证更大的“国家安全”和防止“帝国主义攻击”查韦斯解释。 It’s to preserve Bolivarianism against persistent attempts to destroy it.它的保存bolivarianism对企图摧毁它。 It’s to serve all Venezuelans, advance a new 21st century vision, and put people ahead of privilege.它的服务,所有的委内瑞拉人,与时俱进,一个新的二十一世纪的愿景,并把人民的未来的特权。 It’s to counter Bush administration efforts to restore neoliberalism, return the old order, and destroy social justice in the region’s most model democracy.它的反布什政府的努力,以恢复新自由主义,返回旧秩序,破坏社会公义,在该地区的最民主模式。 Without explaining Venezuelan law or its legislative process, Romero states that the “law (was drafted and passed) behind closed doors, without exposing it to….public debate (and that) contributed to the public uproar and suspicion.” His “public,” of course, are elitists.没有解释委内瑞拉法律或其立法过程中,罗梅罗指出, “法(草拟并通过)闭门造车,没有揭露它… … 。公开辩论(和)的贡献,向公众哗然和猜疑” ,他“公众, “当然,都是精英。 They target Chavez for removal, denounce all his beneficial changes, and falsely accuse him of governing dictatorially.他们的目标,查韦斯搬迁,谴责他的所有有利的变化,并倒打一耙,他的执政dictatorially 。 “They” claim “justice officials, including judges, are required to actively collaborate with the intelligence services rather than serve as a check on them.” According to Americas director for Human Rights Watch (HRW), Jose Miguel Vivanco: “This is a government that simply doesn’t believe in the separation of powers….(It requires) the country’s judges (to) serve as spies for the government.” Vivanco knows better and damages HRW’s credibility with comments like these. “他们”索赔“司法官员,包括法官,须积极合作与情报服务,而不是充当检查对他们的影响。 ”据美洲主任,人权观察组织(人权观察) ,何塞米格尔维万科: “这是一个政府根本不相信,在权力分立的… … 。 (它要求)该国的法官( )充当间谍,为政府“维万科更清楚和损害人权观察的信誉与评论想这些。 Romero uses them with relish to aid the imperial project.罗梅罗使用他们津津乐道的援助帝国项目。 Venezuela’s internal threat is unmentioned.委内瑞拉的内部威胁是没有提及。 Rogue elements infest the government and military.无赖分子infest政府和军队。 They oppose democracy and social justice.他们反对民主和社会正义。 Washington supports them.华盛顿支持他们。 They must be found and removed.他们必须找到并拆除。 Venezuelans demand it.委内瑞拉人的需求。 Better intelligence will help.更好的情报将有助于。 Romero won’t report it.罗梅罗将不会报告它。 Instead, he inverts truth and sides with forces trying to destabilize and undermine a government of, by and for the people.相反,他颠倒真相和双方势力试图破坏和削弱政府,和为人民谋。 He quotes “a prominent legal scholar” (in fact, right wing lawyer Rocio San Miguel) saying “This is the most scandalous effort to intimidate the population in the 10 years this government has been in power.他的报价“的一个突出的法律学者” (事实上,右翼律师rocio圣米格尔)说: “这是最可耻的努力,以恐吓民众,在这10年,政府一直在权力。 Under the new law (information I have) could be considered a threat to national security and I could be sent immediately to jail.” Indeed she could if she violates the law or tries to subvert the government.根据新的法律(资讯我)可被视为对国家安全构成威胁,我可以立即送往监狱。 “事实上,她可以,如果她违反了法律或试图颠覆政府。 Otherwise, she’s entitled to all benefits and protections Venezuelan law affords everyone.否则,她的题为所有的权益和保护委内瑞拉法律给予每一个人。 No comment from Romero.没有评论,从罗梅罗。 AP echoed The New Times in its headlined May 31 report: “Venezuelan intelligence law draws protests, seen as potential tool against dissent.” Again, it’s false and misleading and part of the imperial plot against Chavez.鸭呼应新的时代在其标题为5月31日报告说: “委内瑞拉情报依法提请抗议,被视为潜在的工具,对不同政见” 。再次,它的虚假和误导和部分帝国的阴谋反对查韦斯。 AP unfairly equates the new law to the USA Patriot Act, when, in fact, it’s totally dissimilar.鸭不公平相等于新的法律,向美国爱国者法,当,事实上,它的完全不同。 The US law violates constitutional civil liberties.美国法律违反了宪法公民自由权。 Venezuela’s respects them, but it’s easy for protesters to claim otherwise.委内瑞拉的尊重他们,但很容易为示威者要求,否则。 Justice Minister Ramon Rodriguez Chacin explained the difference.司法部长拉蒙罗德里格斯哈钦解释的差异。 US law spies on Americans and denies them legal protection.美国的法律,间谍对美国人和否认他们的法律保护。 Venezuela’s law enlists responsible citizen participation in preserving their government.委内瑞拉的法律enlists负责任的公民参与,在维护他们的政府。 They have a stake in “state security and resolving crimes.他们有一个股份, “国家安全和解决的罪行。 If (they) witness (wrongdoing and) hide it, then (they) are an accomplice to that crime.” It doesn’t require people to spy.如果(他们)证人(过失)隐藏它,然后(他们)是共犯,犯罪“ 。它不需要人进行间谍活动。 It wants them to cooperate and be engaged in preserving Bolivarianism and to report threats against it.它要让他们合作,并参与在维护bolivarianism和报告威胁反对。 It’s to make them responsible citizens united for their common self-interest.它的,使他们有责任感的公民,美国为他们的共同的自我利益。 That’s not how BBC sees it as part of its anti-Chavez agenda.这不是如何英国广播公司认为它的一部分,其反查韦斯议程。 Its June 3 online report highlighted: “Venezuela ’spy’ law draws protest….among groups who say it threatens civil liberties.” One of them is HRW’s Vivanco again voicing the same false and misleading statements about “judges serving as spies.” Another source, with a clear anti-Chavez agenda, says the “law may be used as a weapon to silence and intimidate the opposition.”其6月3日在线报告突出了: “委内瑞拉'间谍'法提请抗议… … 。集团之间谁说,它威胁到公民自由” ,其中之一就是人权观察的维万科再次道出了同样的虚假和误导的陈述, “法官充当间谍。 “另一个情报来源,与一个明确的反查韦斯的议程,说: ”法律可以用来作为一种武器,以沉默和恐吓在野党“ 。 In fact, Chavez champions free expression in all forms unlike in America post-9/11.事实上,在查韦斯冠军自由表达的一切形式的不同,在美国的9.11 。 Repressive laws and presidential executive orders stifle it.压制性法律,这些法律和总统行政命令扼杀它。 Activists are targeted, harassed and imprisoned.活动的目标是,骚扰和监禁。 Illegal spying is institutionalized.非法从事间谍活动的制度化。 So are repression, torture and disdain for the rule of law.所以是镇压,酷刑和藐视法治。 Where are BBC, AP, The New York Times and other dominant media voices?那里是英国广播公司,美联社,纽约时报和其他媒体的主导声音? Why aren’t they exposing police state justice?为什么他们不揭露警察国家的正义呢? Instead they denounce democracy, ally with despotism, and acknowledge no hint of hypocrisy.相反,他们谴责民主,与专制主义的盟友,并承认没有提示的虚伪。 Chavez is mirror opposite his media critics and counters them correctly.查韦斯是一面镜子,相反,他批评媒体和柜台,他们的正确。 He calls the USA Patriot Act “dictatorial law.” In contrast, the new Venezuelan one upholds freedom, seeks to preserve it, and is within “a framework of great respect for human rights.” It will combat US subversion that dominant media sources ignore.他呼吁美国爱国者法“独裁” 。在此相反,新的委内瑞拉一,坚持自由,旨在维护它,是“一项伟大的框架内对人权的尊重。 : ”这将打击美国的倾轧,主导媒体来源忽视。 They blame victims instead and are willing co-conspirators against Venezuela’s model democracy.他们责怪受害者不是,并愿意合作,阴谋反对委内瑞拉的民主模式。 Their latest efforts show why Chavez needs all the defense he can marshal against them, and for all the right reasons.他们的最新的努力表明,查韦斯为何需要的所有防御,他可以对他们的元帅,并为所有的权利的理由。 Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.斯蒂芬lendman是一个研究助理的研究中心的全球化。 He lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.他生活在芝加哥和可达成的lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net 。 Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Mondays from 11AM to 1PM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests.也访问他的博客网站在sjlendman.blogspot.com ,并听取他们的全球研究新闻小时就republicbroadcasting.org星期一从上午十一时至下午一时,美国中部时间为前沿的讨论,与各位嘉宾。 All programs are archived for easy listening.所有程序存档,方便听。 See More: 看到更多的: Stephen Lendman 斯蒂芬lendmanHave Your Say: Chavez Revamps His Intelligence Services: The Corporate Media React 你说:查韦斯revamps他的情报服务:企业媒体反应 Please note, only selected comments will be published.请注意,只有选定的评论将出版。 Or discuss this report in our new forums 或讨论这个报告在我们的新论坛 This entry was posted on Saturday, June 7th, 2008 at 2:22 am and is filed under 此项目被张贴在周六, 2008年6月7日在上午02时22分,并提交下 General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反应,此项目通过 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 喂养。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回应 , or ,或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 从你自己的网站。 | Translations 翻译 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Free Newsletter 免费通讯 Related News 相关新闻
Email This Page To A Friend 电子邮件此页给朋友 Latest Headlines 最新的新闻标题
More更多 Breaking News突发新闻 Archive 存档
|
About 大约 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 评语 | | Special Guests 特别来宾 | | Webmasters 网站管理员 |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 所表达的意见,在rinf新闻电线和通讯是唯一的责任作者( S )和并不一定反映的意见,网站管理员。 RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. rinf.com :突破新闻与其他的媒体是copyleft的-复制及分发自由。 News Forum 新闻论坛 |