Breaking News 突發新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭和恐怖主義新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁

BREAKING NEWS 突發新聞

Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 週三， 2008年6月11日

By通過 Stephen Lendman - RINF斯蒂芬lendman -r inf | Information for this article comes from long-time business, finance and political writer and analyst Bob Chapman who publishes the bi-weekly International Forecaster. |信息給這篇文章是來自長期的時間，商業，金融和政治的作家和分析師Bob查普曼誰出版雙周刊國際預測。 It’s power-packed with key information and a valued source for this writer.它的權力，包裝與關鍵信息和一個有價值的來源筆者。 He obtained voluminous material directly from its source.他獲得了大量的材料，直接從源頭。 People need to know it.人民需要知道它。 Read on.閱讀。

SueAnn Arrigo is the source. sueann arrigo是來源。 She was a high-level CIA insider.她是一個高層次的中央情報局內幕。 Her title was Special Operations Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI).她的標題是特別行動顧問，主任中央情報部（ DCI標準） 。 She also established the Remote Viewing Defense protocols for the Pentagon in her capacity as Remote Viewing Advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS).她還建立了遠程觀看國防協議，五角大樓在她的身份，遠端看顧問，參謀長聯席會議（聯合參謀本部） 。 It earned her a two-star general rank in the military.它贏得了她的一兩個明星一般職級在軍事上。 She called it a “ploy” so the Pentagon could get more of her time and have her attend monthly Joint Chiefs of Staff meetings.她稱它是“伎倆” ，因此，五角大樓可能獲得更多的時間和她有她參加的每月參謀長聯席會議的會議。 Only high-level types are invited, and she was there from October 2003 to July 2004.只有高層次的類型是邀請，和她有從2003年10月至2004年7月。

Part of her job involved intelligence gathering on Iraq and Afghanistan - until August 2004 when she refused to spread propaganda about a non-existant Iranian nuclear weapons program and left.的一部分，她的工作涉及情報收集，對伊拉克和阿富汗-直至2 004年8月，當她拒絕蔓延宣傳約一不存在的伊朗核武器計劃和離開。 She followed in the footsteps of others at CIA who resigned for reasons of conscience and became critics - most notably Ray McGovern, Ralph McGehee, and Phil Agee.她遵循的腳步，其他在美國中央情報局誰辭職的原因，有良知的，並成為批評者-最顯著的射線麥戈文，拉爾夫m cgehee，和菲爾a gee。

On May 16, 2008, Arrigo sent extensive government corruption and cover-up information to Henry Waxman, Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform committee - in 12 separate cases. 5月16日， 2008年， arrigo發送廣泛的政府腐敗和隱瞞信息亨利韋克斯曼，內務委員會主席的監督和政府改革委員會-在1 2個單獨的個案。 This article covers four of them or about one-third of what Congress got.此文章涵蓋其中4人，或約三分之一的國會得到什麼。 The 12 are explosive and revealing but just the tip of the iceberg:該12頃炸藥和揭示，但只是冰山的一角：

– of government corruption and war profiteering; -政府的腐敗和戰爭謀取暴利;

– sweetheart deals and kickbacks; -甜心交易和回扣;

– high-level types on the take; -高層次的類型對採取;

– trillions of missing dollars; -十萬億失踪美元;

– on September 10, 2001, Rumsfeld admitting “According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions;” -對2 001年9月1 0日，拉姆斯菲爾德承認： “根據一些估計，我們不能追踪二萬三點零零億美元的交易” ;

– imagine the current amount; -試想，目前的金額;

– its corrosive effect on the nation; and people should -其腐蝕作用，對國家和人民應

– demand accountability - who profits, who pays and what are the consequences of militarism gone mad. -需求問責制-誰的利潤，誰付費和什麼後果軍國主義經歷了瘋牛病。

SueAnn Arrigo offers a glimpse and at great personal risk. sueann arrigo提供了一瞥，並冒著極大的個人危險。 In August 2001, DCI George Tenet told her to assemble “a moving van full of Pentagon documents showing Defense Contractor kickbacks to Pentagon officials.” She did as instructed but not to expose corruption as she learned - to conceal it and in her judgment so CIA could divert defense business to Halliburton and “Carlyle-related contractors.” She stated: “The mood at the CIA and Pentagon was ‘war is coming’ because the Bush Family stands to make billions from it — so get ready.”在2001年8月， DCI的特尼特告訴她，組裝“的動人車充滿了五角大樓的文件顯示的國防承包商的回扣五角大樓官員” ，她的指示，但不揭露腐敗，因為她的教訓-隱瞞它和在她的判斷，因此，中央情報局可轉移國防業務向哈利伯頓和“凱雷有關的承辦商” ，她指出： “情緒在美國中央情報局和五角大樓是'戰爭是未來' ，因為布什家族的立場，使數十億美元-因此，做好準備” 。

Arrigo was shocked at what she found and how brazenly the Pentagon wrote it up because it feels untouchable, especially since 2001. arrigo感到震驚，在她發現什麼，以及如何明目張膽地五角大樓寫了，因為它覺得碰不得的，特別是自2001年以來。 That notion proved misguided after CIA used the material to blackmail or bribe its officials “into ‘working on’ the Halliburton-Carlyle team.” Top CIA types were involved, and Tenet laid it out for Arrigo: You’ve “given me the keys to the kingdom.這一概念證明，誤導後，中情局使用的材料勒索或行賄官員“到'工作， '哈利伯頓公司-凱雷團隊” 。頂端中央情報局類型，涉及和特尼特奠定了出來，為arrigo ：您“給我的鑰匙到英國。 (These) documents will make me rich.” （這些）文件，將令我豐富“ 。

She collected three types.她所收集的三種類型。 Her report covers one but has plenty of incriminating evidence.她的報告涵蓋了一，但有大量的罪證。 Her precise recall of dates and names is incomplete, but events are factually right and damning on how Washington operates.她記得確切的日期和名稱是不完整的，但事件是事實的權利和譴責華盛頓就如何運作。 It’s always been this way but never to the degree as under George Bush.它一直是這樣，但從未向程度，因為根據布什。 Arrigo exposes the scheme - the systematic looting of the treasury to enrich contractors and high-level officials at Pentagon, CIA and others well-placed in government. arrigo暴露了計劃-系統地掠奪庫務，以豐富的承建商及高級別官員在五角大樓，中央情報局和其他人以及放置在政府。 Precise amounts are unknown, but at mimimum are countless multi-billions, even trillions - at taxpayer expense and diverted from essential social and infrastructure needs.確切數額不詳，但在最低是無數多億元，甚至上萬億-在犧牲納稅人和改行從基本的社會和基礎設施的需要。

Case 1: Ordering Unneeded New Fighter Aircraft案例1 ：訂購不需要的新戰鬥機

Arrigo discovered high-level Pentagon corruption. arrigo發現高層次的五角大樓腐敗。 It involved bid-rigging and implicated “an Air Force general on the JCS and a Defense Contractor, Boeing.” She disclosed it to JCS Chairman Hugh Shelton and DCI George Tenet, and in both instances drew blanks.它涉及串通投標，並有牽連的“空軍秘書長關於聯合參謀本部和國防承包商，波音公司。 ”她透露，它向參聯會主席謝爾頓休和DCI的特尼特，並在這兩個例子中提請空白。 She also reported it to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the investigative arm of Congress.她還報告，它向政府問責辦公室（高） ，調查機構國會。 It was vetted and confirmed, but left unaddressed the larger issue of whether new generation planes are needed at an enormous cost to taxpayers.這是審核和確認，但置之不理較大的問題，是否新一代的飛機，需要在一個巨大的成本，給納稅人。 Arrigo believed not, and several Air Force generals agreed. arrigo相信沒有，和幾個空軍將領表示同意。 Not other JCS members, however, who she learned are on the take.沒有其他參聯會的成員，然而，誰，她的教訓是對接管。

There’s more.還有更精彩。 They “had the gall to try to force through another unneeded plane contract for Boeing.” At an early 2004 JCS meeting, Arrigo complained about the previous undelivered order because it didn’t meet Pentagon specifications.他們“居然試圖通過武力的另一個不需要的飛機為波音公司的合同。 ”在一個2004年年初聯合參謀本部次會議上， arrigo抱怨前未秩序，因為它不符合五角大樓的規格。 Yet one general in particular tried “to force the US military to buy another (unneeded) upgrade.” One other JCS member backed her to no avail, and the new order went through.然而，一個一般，尤其是試圖“迫使美國軍方購買另一（不必要的）升級。 ”一參聯會其他成員的支持，她不得要領，和新秩序的經歷。 Arrigo rightfully concluded that new plane orders were to enrich Boeing and high-level Pentagon types getting kickbacks for their cooperation. arrigo理所當然地得出結論認為，新飛機的訂單分別以豐富的波音和高層次的類型五角大樓獲得回扣，為他們的合作。

She also learned how much - an average $22,000 “for each (JCS meeting) vote according to their bank” records.她還了解到，多少-平均二點二零萬美元“每個（聯合參謀本部次會議）表決，根據他們的銀行”的紀錄。 Not US ones.不是美國。 CIA-arranged Swiss accounts specifically for this purpose.美國中央情報局安排瑞士賬戶專門用於這一目的。 Everyone at the meeting cashed in, except Arrigo and one dissenting general.大家在會議上兌現，除arrigo和1持異議的一般。 More disturbing is that this is standard Pentagon practice - handouts to contractors; kickbacks to complicit brass; and taxpayers out multi-billions - year after year.更加令人不安的是，這是標準的做法，五角大樓-施捨給承建商;回扣，以共犯黃銅;納稅人多億元-年復一年。

Jeff St. Clair wrote about it in his 2005 book “Grand Theft Pentagon: Tales of Corruption and Profiteering in the War on Terror.” It’s an explosive account of how contractors like Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Bechtel and the Bush family-connected Carlyle Group scam multi-billions at taxpayer expense and not a whiff of it in the mainstream.傑夫聖克萊爾寫在他的2005年圖書的“ Grand Theft五角大樓：故事的腐敗和暴利在反恐戰爭。 ”這是一個爆炸性的帳戶如何承建商一樣，哈利伯頓公司，洛克希德馬丁，波音， Bechtel和布什家族連接凱雷集團騙案多億元，在納稅人的犧牲而不是一個whiff資訊科技的主流。 It’s the reason US annual “defense” spending tops $1.1 trillion (conservatively) with all military, homeland security, veterans, NASA, debt service and other allocations included.它的原因，美國每年一度的“國防”支出頂部1.1萬億美元（保守）與所有軍事，國土安全部，退伍軍人，美國航天局，債務服務和其他撥款包括在內。

Case 2: Halliburton Delivers Half Full Cartons to the Pentagon’s “Swing Shift”案例2 ：哈利伯頓公司提供半滿箱，以五角大樓的“擺動轉變”

Arrigo refers to the Pentagon’s Receiving Department “swing shift” personnel. arrigo指五角大樓的接收處“迴旋轉移”的人員。 They alone are on the take so other shifts are shut out and can’t report it.他們僅是就要花那麼其他輪班關閉，並不能報告。 As a CIA insider, she checked and found damning evidence - about “the military (not) getting supplies to the troops on time.” She also learned that Halliburton has its “Representative to the CIA,” and one at the Pentagon as well.作為一個中情局的內幕，她檢查，並發現嚴厲的證據-關於“軍事（不）越來越用品到部隊的時間。 ”她還了解到，哈利伯頓公司有其“代表美國中央情報局” ，一個在五角大樓以及。 Both get federal salaries but neither was “hired by CIA or the military through their personnel departments.既得到聯邦薪俸，但也不是“聘請的美國中央情報局或軍事透過他們的人事部門。 Neither had done military training or trained at (CIA’s) ‘Farm’ as a spy.” Arrigo was disturbed and with good reason when orders from the top said back off.既不做了軍事訓練或訓練，在（中央情報局的） '農場'作為一個間諜“ arrigo感到不安，並有很好的理由時，訂單從上方的說，回到小康。

It got worse.它越變越糟糕。 Arrigo worked at CIA for over 30 years and reported directly to Tenet. arrigo工作，在中央情報局超過30年，並直接向特尼特。 But she wasn’t prepared for what she found - a new section at the Agency without her knowledge.但她沒有準備什麼，她發現-一種新的節在機構未經她的知識。 It employed 40 people, all working for Halliburton “while being paid by the US taxpayer as if they were CIA.” It was secret.它採用40人，所有工作，為哈利伯頓公司“ ，而正在支付的由美國納稅人的作為，如果他們被中情局： ”這是秘密。 No files were on them.沒有檔案對他們的影響。 They were never interviewed, never vetted, and she concluded: “CIA had a back door in its security to let Halliburton put anyone they wanted in (its) hallways.他們從來沒有採訪，從來沒有審核，她總結說： “美國中央情報局有一個後門，在其安全，讓哈利伯頓公司提出任何他們想在（ ITS ）的走廊。 It was an outrageous (breach) of US National Security,” and in a post-9/11 “war on terrorism” climate.這是一個荒謬的（違反）美國國家安全“ ，在一9.11 ”反恐戰爭“的氣候。

She was shocked and told Tenet.她感到震驚，並告訴特尼特。 His reply: “Yes, I know.” Head of CIA building security also knew.他的答复： “是的，我知道” 。元首中央情報局大廈保安也知道。 Arrigo asked what he’d do about it. arrigo問什麼，他想要做的。 His answer: “Keep my mouth shut so I can stay alive and I suggest you do the same.” She asked if he, CIA or Halliburton would kill her if she talked.他回答： “讓我嘴裡關閉，所以我可以留在活著，我建議你也這樣做。 ”她問，如果他，中央情報局或哈利伯頓公司將殺死她，如果她說。 He didn’t think so.他不這麼認為。 Would national security firm CACI do it because it’s affiliated with Halliburton and also has a CIA back door for its personnel at the Agency.將國家安全的堅定caci這樣做是因為它的附屬與哈利伯頓公司也有中央情報局後門為其工作人員在該機構。

Arrigo dug deeper. arrigo挖更深。 She got inside Halliburton’s area and asked questions.她哈利伯頓公司內的面積和問題。 Why was the company shipping half the contracted for amounts and shortchanging the troops and taxpayers.為什麼該公司航運的一半，合同金額和shortchanging部隊和納稅人。 It was no different for war zones.這是沒有不同的戰區。 Halliburton “set up the same corrupt system of swing shift receivers (for) at least 3 continents.哈利伯頓公司“成立，對同一腐敗系統擺動轉移接收機（ ）至少3個大洲。 They received the cartons and signed (off) that the goods were all received properly.他們收到的紙箱，並簽署了（關閉）該項貨物均收到了妥善。 Then the shortages later were chalked up to thefts or war damage, etc.”然後短缺後來被chalked最多盜竊或戰爭破壞等“

Arrigo again informed Tenet. arrigo再次通知特尼特。 His answer: “This is nothing new,” then added: “Have a report about it on my desk before Christmas (2001).” It got worse.他回答： “這是什麼新” ，然後又說： “有一個報告，關於它在我台在聖誕節前（ 2001年） 。 ”它越變越糟糕。 Arrigo told Tenet he’s responsible for “correct(ing) Halliburton’s short-shipping and its invasion of the CIA.” He said he couldn’t because the White House tied his hands. arrigo特尼特說，他的負責“正確的（荷蘭）哈利伯頓公司的短期船舶及入侵美國中央情報局” ，他說，他不能因為白宮捆綁他的手。 Call Congress, Arrigo said.呼籲國會， arrigo說。 DCI “should be a man of courage.” Tenet ignored her, so Arrigo faxed documents revealing Halliburton fraud to GAO - omitting national security secrets. DCI標準“應該是一個男子的勇氣。 ”特尼特忽略了她，所以arrigo傳真文件揭示了哈利伯頓公司的欺詐高-省略了國家安全機密。 One of them crowed about the scheme’s profitability, and having high-level officials involved made it foolproof.其中一人crowed有關該計劃的盈利能力，並有高級別官員參與了萬無一失。

It was clever and even more devious than Arrigo imagined.這是聰明，更狡猾，比arrigo可想而知的。 Halliburton uses each shortage complaint as a new order.哈利伯頓公司利用每個短缺的投訴，作為一個新的秩序。 “In that way (it) never (loses) by having to make good for (what’s) missing,” and (it gets) paid double for the same merchandise. “以這種方式（它）從來沒有（輸） ，由作出好（這是什麼）失踪” ， （它）支付雙倍為同一商品。

Arrigo knew too much, took risks to learn it, and what happened next is shocking. arrigo知道太多，發生的風險要了解它，所發生的事情，其次是令人震驚。 Halliburton’s “CIA Representative” confronted her, tore out her phone, ransacked her office, removed every shred of paper, and hauled her off bodily “to a prison cell” inside its basement offices.哈利伯頓公司的“美國中央情報局的代表”面對她，撕毀了她的電話，洗劫了她的辦公室，撤職，每一絲一毫的文件，並拉她的身體小康“到一個牢房”內，其基底辦事處。 She was intimidated and threatened.她被恐嚇和威脅。 Thought she might be killed.以為她可能會被殺死。 She survived, but the message was clear.她存活，但信息是明確的。 She complained to Tenet.她抱怨，以特尼特。 Showed him her bruises.他表明，她的瘀傷。 He responded dismissively: “There, there, everything will be all right in the morning.”他回應dismissively ： “有，有，一切都將所有的權利，在上午的” 。

GAO still has Arrigo’s files.高仍然有arrigo的檔案。 It began investigating but stopped.它開始調查，但停止。 She thinks that Congress can resume it and asked Waxman to do it.她認為，國會就可以恢復它，並詢問韋克斯曼這樣做。 That’s where things now stand.這是哪裡的東西，現在的立場。

Case 3: The White House Conspiracy to Cook the Books - Halliburton, Carlyle and CIA案例3 ：白宮的陰謀，庫克的書籍-哈利伯頓公司，凱雷和中央情報局

In 2002, Arrigo tried a new tact - ingratiating herself with “Halliburton’s Man” and using it to her advantage.在2002年， arrigo嘗試新的技巧-i ngratiating自己與“哈利伯頓公司的人”和用它來她的優勢。 She offered cooperation for access to his space and make him think she was on his side.她所提供的合作進入他的空間，使他覺得她是在他身邊。 It worked, went on for four and one-half months through late May, and it paid off - with plenty of insider knowledge “about Halliburton and how it works.” Enough to fill a book, she says, but her account sticks to highlights.它的工作，到上為4和一個半月的時間，通過5月下旬，和它支付了小康-大量的內幕知識“關於哈利伯頓公司以及它如何工程。 ”夠了，以填補一本書，她說，但她的帳戶，堅持突出。

First off, it’s pure myth that Dick Cheney stopped running the company.首先，這純粹是神話切尼停止運行，該公司。 “He called in orders to the man I worked for almost every day and sometimes two or more times a day. “他呼籲在命令該名男子我工作，幾乎每天都有，有時兩個或更多的時間一天。 He remained (Halliburton’s) functional head in all but name.他依然（哈利波頓）的功能頭，但在所有的名稱。 No one….had the power to override his orders.” Second, Cheney never divested himself of Halliburton profits.沒有人… … 。有權力凌駕他的命令“ 。第二，切尼從來沒有剝奪了自己的哈利伯頓公司的利潤。 “He merely hid how (he got them) through a series of shell companies.” “他只是躲在如何（他）通過一系列的空殼公司” 。

One of Arrigo’s jobs was to liaison between Halliburton and CIA’s “creative accounting departments.” In other words, their co-conspiratorial treasury looting efforts, and Arrigo got insider access to it.其中一個arrigo的工作是哈利伯頓公司之間的聯絡和中央情報局的“創造性的會計部門。 ”換句話說，他們的合作的陰謀庫務搶劫的努力，和arrigo得到內幕的訪問。 Her advanced math and computer software training qualified her.她的高等數學和計算機軟件的培訓合格的她。 In a few months, she became expert in how CIA and Halliburton hid their “financial illegalities.”在數個月內，她成為專家如何在美國中央情報局和哈利伯頓躲在他們的“金融亂” 。

She explained - “Computers are good ways to fool most people because (they don’t) look inside of them.” They can be programmed “to print out one set of books for regulators, another for Defense Contractors, another for the Pentagon, another for the taxpayer,” and so forth.她解釋-“電腦是好辦法，以迷惑，因為大多數人（他們不）看看裡面的他們， ”他們可以編程“可以打印出一套書籍，為監管機構，另一種為國防承包商，另一為五角大樓，另一種為納稅人“ ，等等。 It’s simple.它的特點是簡便。 Decide what you want, and machines will create it in any desired form.決定你想要，和機器將創建它在任何想要的形式。 The trick is doing it expertly, most criminals can’t, so they need professionals to do it for them.訣竅在於做expertly ，大部分罪犯不能，所以他們需要的專業人士，這樣做給他們。 It means crimes are never secret, and many computer experts know about them.這意味著犯罪從來都不是秘密，許多電腦專家了解它們。 CIA has always been tainted, kept it secret since inception, so far has been untouchable, but remains vulnerable to exposure by people of conscience like Arrigo.美國中央情報局一直是污點，保持它的秘密自成立以來，至今已碰不得的，但仍然很脆弱暴露人的良心，像arrigo 。

She explained: Halliburton has eight software programmers at CIA.她解釋：哈利伯頓8軟件編程在中央情報局。 Its home office has many more.其家庭辦公有許多更多。 She was on conference calls with 60 of them on ways to conceal illegalities and assure none of it leaks out.她對電話會議，與60他們就如何掩蓋違法，並保證沒有它洩漏出來。 The company has less expertise than CIA so the Agency took charge to make the two systems compatible.該公司已較少的專業知識比中央情報局，使該機構負責使這兩個系統兼容。 It took several years and over 100 programmers.花了數年，以及超過100程序員。 They came, left for other jobs, and took insider knowledge with them.他們一來，留給其他工作，並採取內幕的知識與他們。 It risks more leaks about Halliburton, other contractors, CIA, the Pentagon, high-ups in government, and the Basel-based Bank of International Settlements for its part in corruption.它的風險更透露，哈利伯頓，其他承辦，中央情報局，五角大樓，高UPS在政府，和巴塞爾-基於國際清算銀行就其本身而言，在腐敗。

Many investigations are ongoing, but huge pressure is exerted to quash them.許多的調查正在進行，但龐大的施加壓力，以打消他們。 It’s feared leaks may unravel the whole scheme - a vast corruption web involving countless numbers of contractors, related companies, and many high level government and Pentagon insiders.它的擔心洩露可能破壞整個計劃-一個龐大的腐敗網絡，涉及無數承辦，有關的公司，和很多高層次的政府和五角大樓的業內人士。 Cover-up software hides it.包括後續的軟件隱藏它。 Taxpayers fund it.納稅人的基金。 Amounts keep getting greater, and they’re up to unimaginable levels.數額不斷得到更大的，同時，他們還在行動是不可想像的水平。

Arrigo explained the system. arrigo解釋制度。 Suppose Halliburton sold product A in 100 Lot Sizes, in Quantity X at Price Y to the Pentagon on a given date.假設哈利伯頓公司出售的產品一在100地段的大小，在數量上第十價格Y的五角大樓對某一特定日期。 Most civilian invoices disclose this.最平民的發票，披露這一點。 Pentagon ones don’t so contractors can cheat and Pentagon brass profit.五角大樓的不使承包商可以欺騙和五角大樓黃銅的利潤。 Missing information conceals whether all merchandise was delivered as nothing indicates quantities shipped.失踪的資料，掩蓋了，是否所有商品交付如無顯示的數量已發運。 Further, repackaging also hides proper amounts.此外，包裝還隱藏適當的數額。 Omitting the price alone conceals whether a shipment was shorted, but CIA is more clever than that.省略價格單是否隱藏著一批貨物的縮短，但美國中央情報局是更聰明得多。 It experimented with “tested receivers at some of its front companies” to learn how best to deceive them.它試行“測試接收器在它的一些前沿公司” ，以了解如何最好地欺騙他們。 What works best is “shifting prices around like random noise” - one day this cost, another a different one, and so forth.什麼工程，最好是“轉移價格一樣，周圍的隨機噪音” -這一天的成本，另一個不同的一，等等。

One company used a “gross overcharge method” that looked suspicious.一間公司用了一個“嚴重濫法” ，看來可疑。 It got receivers to discover the real price, and that defeated CIA’s scheme.它得到的接收器，發現實際價格，並打敗了中情局的計劃。 When it works, it cooks the books, and no one’s the wiser.當工程，它廚師的書籍，沒有人的聰明。 Ledger entries are inflated, undercut, omitted, added, or varied in amounts of similar transactions.總分類賬項目膨脹，削弱了，省略，補充，或在不同的數額類似的交易。 Like a “professional crime institution,” CIA is expert at falsifying books so no one catches on.像“犯罪的專業機構， ”美國中央情報局專家在偽造的書籍，所以沒有人對漁獲量。 How?如何？ By random price variations to keep auditors off balance and unable to discover corruption patterns.隨機的價格變化，以保持審計失去平衡，無法發現腐敗的模式。

Another example:另一個例子：

CIA varies its front company prices monthly.美國中央情報局不同，其前線公司的價格每月。 Suppose Halliburton made a purchase “when it (used) a cost inflation idea of cheating.假設哈利伯頓公司提出了購買“當它（使用）成本通脹的想法作弊。 Halliburton (has) an incentive to inflate the cost of its purchases (to) justify (its) high (price) to the military.” So as standard practice it uses CIA’s highest price and claims that amount for its cost.哈利波頓（已）的激勵膨脹的成本，其購買（ ）的理由（ ITS ）的高（價格） ，以軍事“ ，以便作為標準做法，它使用中央情報局的最高價格，並聲稱數額的費用。

But comparing two sets of books reveals the scheme.但比較兩套圖書，揭示了計劃。 So methodology became more sophisticated to conceal it.因此，方法論，成為更先進的隱瞞。 Halliburton takes CIA prices and doubles them on its books.哈利伯頓公司需中央情報局的價格和雙打他們就其書籍。 It then claims the Agency recorded half the charge “accidently,” says its front company promised a 50% discount, but never delivered.然後聲稱該機構記錄的一半收費“的意外，說： ”前線公司承諾， 50 ％的折扣，但從未發表。 CIA looks bad, and it balked.中情局看起來不好，而且猶豫不決。 No matter.不管。 Halliburton still does it, but CIA has “lots of fronts with lots of customers and worse problems (to hide) than merely jacking up prices.哈利伯頓公司仍然沒有，但美國中央情報局“大量的各條戰線上有很多客戶和差的問題（隱藏）不僅僅是托價格。 Some fronts (are) fictitious and (make) no products.” Others have real customers plus fake ones to launder money.在一些方面（是）和虛構（使）無產品“ 。別人有真正的客戶，另加假，以洗錢活動。 CIA tries to “make (their) crimes ‘undetectable.’ ” Halliburton hopes to “sneak by” until caught, then find a way to weasel out of it with minimal damage or cost.美國中央情報局試圖“使（他們的）罪行' undetectable ” 。哈利伯頓公司希望“偷渡” ，直到被捕，然後找到一種方法， weasel出它與最小損害或費用。

Case 4: Halliburton’s Rigged Back Door Accounting Computer at the Pentagon案例4 ：哈利伯頓公司的操縱走後門會計電腦在五角大樓

In early 2002, GAO got damning evidence: that Halliburton overbills and short-ships - deliberate fraudulent acts as standard company practice, confident it can get away with it, and most often it does.在2002年初，高了嚴厲的證據：哈利伯頓overbills和短期的船舶-蓄意欺詐行為作為規範的公司的做法，有信心可以擺脫它，最常它。

GAO has the goods to expose it from Halliburton and Pentagon invoices.高有貨物揭露它從哈利博頓公司和五角大樓的發票。 They reveal a problem.它們揭示了一個問題。 They don’t match, are grossly inflated, and payments exceed amounts billed - by about 35%.他們不匹配，嚴重膨脹，和付款的金額超過帳單-約3 5％ 。 Arrigo met with GAO and compared notes. arrigo會見了高和比較說明。 Halliburton has similar Pentagon and CIA-paid staff, and George Bush approved it in a secret Executive Order Arrigo has for proof.哈利伯頓公司也有類似的五角大樓和中央情報局高薪的工作人員，和布什批准它在一個秘密的行政命令arrigo已證明文件。 She gave it to GAO plus other documents showing national security is compromised and taxpayers cheated - hugely.她列舉了它高另加其他文件顯示，國家安全是妥協和納稅人受騙-巨大的。

One document lists Halliburton’s CIA and Pentagon staff, what little official records discloses about them, their secret office locations, and information on their private security staff.一個文件，列出了哈利伯頓公司的美國中央情報局和五角大樓工作人員，很少有什麼正式記錄，披露了約他們，他們的秘密辦公地點，和資料，他們的私人保安人員。 Arrigo discovered that Halliburton’s top CIA man served time for felony fraud. arrigo發現，哈利伯頓公司的最高中央情報局男子送達時間為重罪欺詐行為。 Another at Pentagon was convicted as well - for stealing Army vehicles, then profiteering by transshipping them overseas.另一個在五角大樓被定罪，以及-偷竊軍隊車輛，然後謀取暴利，他們所轉運海外。

Dick Cheney knew, blocked background checks to conceal it, but Arrigo found out and about the Pentagon fraud that followed.切尼知道，封鎖的背景檢查，以掩蓋它，但arrigo發現和有關五角大樓欺詐其次。 She has a handwritten Cheney memo instructing his man “to make sure that the Pentagon pays us all that it owes us and then some.” CIA’s forgery department verified the writing is Cheney’s.她有一個手寫便箋，切尼指示他的人“ ，以確保五角大樓自付我們所有人，它欠我們，然後一些” 。中央情報局的偽造署核實，寫作是切尼的。

Arrigo also has a letter from Halliburton’s Pentagon man to his CIA counterpart, and it’s damning. arrigo也有信從哈利伯頓公司的五角大樓的男子，他中央情報局的對應，它的譴責。 He brags how he’s “getting more than we bargained for (from) the Pentagon” and suggested they get together to compare notes.他炫耀他如何的“獲得比我們更討價還價（從）五角大樓” ，並建議他們聚在一起，進行比較說明。 They did and Arrigo taped it.他們和arrigo錄音。 The evidence once more is damning - about how easy it is to scam the system; befriend accounting personnel; install company programmers; check bills supposedly behind in payments; install a special software code for higher amounts; and do all of the above at Pentagon and CIA.證據一旦更多的是譴責-關於它是如何的方便，以詐騙系統;交朋友的會計人員;安裝公司程序員;檢查條例草案假定的背後，在付款;安裝一個特殊的軟件代碼較高數額;做上述所有在五角大樓和中央情報局。

Arrigo informed George Tenet so he’d stop “Halliburton from ripping off the American taxpayer via the CIA and Pentagon.” Tenet hardly blinked and responded casually: “Well, you certainly have done a thorough job as usual.” He then offered to inform the White House to “correct the problem.” Arrigo did herself, GAO as well, and later learned that the Bush administration (likely Dick Cheney) blocked an investigation. arrigo通知特尼特，所以他要一站式“的哈利伯頓公司從擷取小康美國納稅人通過美國中央情報局和五角大樓。 ”特尼特難以blinked ，並回答了隨便： “好，你一定做了徹底的工作一切如常。 ”然後，他所提供的通知白宮“正確的問題” 。 arrigo沒有自己，以及高，後來據悉，布什政府（可能切尼）封鎖調查。

This article covers four of Arrigo’s 12 cases.此文章涵蓋四個arrigo的12例。 Their evidence is damning and shows systemic contractor, government, CIA and Pentagon fraud involving enormous amounts of money.他們的證據是譴責和顯示系統的承辦商，政府，中央情報局和五角大樓的欺詐行為涉及巨額的金錢。 One or more articles will follow if more material can be obtained.一個或一個以上的文章會跟進，如果有更多的物質可以得到。 It’s not what Pentagon and CIA want outed so getting it is never simple and revealing it not without risks.它不是什麼，五角大樓和中央情報局希望outed ，使越來越它從來不是簡單的揭示，它並非沒有風險。

See More: 看到更多的： Stephen Lendman 斯蒂芬lendman USA News 美國新聞

Have Your Say: Exposing Bush Administration Corruption 你說：揭露布什政府的腐敗
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。

Or discuss this report in our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的新論壇

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Name (required) 姓名（必填）

Mail (will not be published) (required) 郵件（不會被公佈） （必填）

Website 網站

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 at 12:43 pm and is filed under 此項目被張貼在週三， 2008年6月11日在下午12時43分，並提交下 Contributions & Guests 貢獻＆客人 , ， General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反應，此項目通過 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 餵養。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回應 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 從你自己的網站。

Loading ...載入中...

TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS top新聞討論

LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS 最新消息討論

Activism & Protest News 積極與抗議新聞 | | Business News 商業新聞 | | Civil & Human Rights News 公務員＆人權新聞 | | Environmental News 環境新聞 | | Media News 新聞 | | Globalisation News 全球經濟一體化新聞 | | Web Development News Web開發新聞

ADVERTISEMENTS廣告

SITE MAPS網站地圖

7/7 7 / 7 Afghanistan阿富汗 Alternative Energy替代能源 Art藝術 BBC英國廣播公司 Big Brother大哥哥 Bilderberg 。 Bilderberg Biometrics生物識別技術 Bush布什 CIA美國中央情報局 Climate Change氣候變化 Cover Up掩蓋 Cults邪教 Culture文化 Database State數據庫狀態 David Hicks大衛希克斯 David Ray Griffin朱射線格里芬 Democrats同盟 Demos演示 Drugs藥物 Education教育 EU歐盟 False Flag虛假國旗 FBI美國聯邦調查局 Fraud欺詐 Free Speech免費的講話 Freemasons共濟會 G8八國集團 Globalization全球化 Guantanamo關塔那摩 Health News健康新聞 History歷史 ID Cards身份證 Internet互聯網 Iran伊朗 Iraq伊拉克 Israel以色列 Law法律 Marches遊行 MI5軍情五處 MI6軍情六處 Microsoft微軟 Military軍事 MoD按付款當日價格計算 Money金錢 Music音樂 NASA美國航天局 Neocons新保守主義者 NSA美國國家安全局 Oil石油 Pakistan巴基斯坦 Podcast播客 Police State警察國家 Propaganda宣傳 RFID的RFID RINF rinf Rumsfeld拉姆斯菲爾德 Science科學 Secrecy保密 Security安全 Slavery奴役 Space空間 Sports體育 Spying諜報活動 Stephen Lendman斯蒂芬lendman Technology技術 Terrorism恐怖主義 Tony Blair托尼布萊爾 Torture酷刑 TV電視 UK News英國新聞 UN聯合國 USA News美國新聞 Video視頻 Voting投票 Warfare戰 White House白宮 Wolfowitz沃爾福威茨 World News世界新聞 Yahoo雅虎
2003 - 2005 Archives 2003 -2 005檔案 | 2005 - 2007 Archives 2005年-2 007年檔案 | 2007 - 2008 Archives 2007 -2 008檔案 | Current Archives目前檔案 | Past Version |過去的版本

About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員