Photographes britanniques forcés de jouer la roulette avec anti la loi de terreur

En Grande-Bretagne, les cannettes de fil ont la puissance de vous rechercher si vous prenez une photo d'un secteur « sensible », mais elles ne vous indiqueront pas quels secteurs sont « sensibles, » parce qu'ils sont ainsi « sensibles. »

Le journal britannique de la photographie essaye d'employer LE R-U La liberté de Loi de l'information à découvrir qui place en Grande-Bretagne ont de tels photons précieux que les gens qui les rassemblent sans autorisation peuvent faire violer leurs droits civiques, mais jusqu'ici eux ont été non réussie.

Il n'y a aucune évidence que des photographies d'utilisation de terroristes pour projeter des attaques. Indeed, if disclosing the visible features of notable, iconic buildings puts them in danger, we may as well tear them all down now and get it over with, since the whole point of a notable, iconic building is that everybody knows what they look like.

The Home Office has rejected a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the BJP regarding the disclosure of the list of all areas where police officers are authorised to stop-and-search photographers under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000…While it is common knowledge that the entire City of London [ed: the City of London is a one-square-mile financial district], at the behest of the Metropolitan Police, is covered by the legislation, it remains unclear which other areas in England and Wales have requested the stop-and-search powers…

The request asked for a ‘full list of all areas - in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - subject to Section 44 Terrorism Act 2000 authorisations, which the Home Office has a statutory duty to be aware of.’

The request was rejected in late May on grounds of national security. ‘In relation to authorisations for England and Wales, I can confirm that the Home Office holds the information that you requested. I am, however, not obliged to disclose it to you,’ writes J Fanshaw of the Direct Communications Unit at the Home Office. ‘After careful consideration we have decided that this information is exempt from disclosure by virtue of Section 24(1) and Section 31(1)(a-c) of the Freedom of Information Act…’

As part of its ongoing campaign for photographers’ rights, BJP has appealed the decision, requesting an internal review of the request’s handling. It has also filed 46 additional Freedom of Information Act requests to all Chief Constables in England and Wales, asking them to disclose whether they have asked for stop-and-search powers under section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Cory Doctorow

RSS TrackBack URL

Translate: