在政府显露了意欲的一个义务代码的失败减少工伤事故之后，上司’俱乐部(IoD)主任异常被指责的联合会学院“是，做，因为他们可能有”对帮助的董事防止伤害对他们的工作者。

IoD议会和管理发言人亚历山大Ehmannit声称它是代码，带来由新的辛苦部长急切避免强加必修公司过失杀人法律给上司，发生故障联合会的缺点。

反应几乎没有雇主33%在建筑业的Hasex的研究结果-和上司的编号下限在好客、制造业和运输部门-知道甚而代码， Ehmannit先生保卫了他们的疏忽并且设法改为牵制责备他们的工作者’联合reps。

傲慢地断言那“联合会不是如做到传播教导，因为他们可能是”，他建议经理是无能为力的改进健康与安全在他们的工作场所，除非由联合会推挤如此做。

建筑工人’联合UCATT领导人阿伦Ritchie在撕毁上司没有丢失时刻’虚弱的借口对细片。

“IoD是太愚笨以至于不能了解联合会的目的或他们故意地传播误传”，他猛冲了。

指出建筑是最危险的产业在英国，当72名工作者以前去年被杀死和79， Ritchie先生被注重的年： “我们知道不合格的义务代码不会拯救一名唯一建筑工人的生命，但是，而UCATT做可能的一切保证工作者’安全，它是一个不容置疑的事实许多上司不可能说同样”。

建筑安全运动组织者托尼O’ Brien同意，增加恶意的允许逃脱对于工作者的一个得意洋洋的态度’安全为太长期的指斥“玩事不恭和傲慢上司。

“法律是易上手”，他解释了。 “When workers are killed on the job and companies eventually get hauled before the courts, the judges can’t send bosses to jail because the law doesn’t let them.

“As a result, executives have to pay small fines for taking workers’ lives that don’t make them think twice about what they’ve done,” he insisted.

Relatives of workers killed or maimed in the workplace insisted that asking bosses to do anything “voluntarily” was always bound to end in failure.

“Even the HSE recognises that at least 70 per cent of major and fatal injuries at work are down to management,” Families Against Corporate Killers spokeswoman Louise Adamson related.

“In most cases, the catalogue of ignorance of health and safety laws, deliberate non-compliance and complete lack of fear of the enforcement system and the enforcement authorities by employers, managers and directors is overwhelming.

“What is needed is a legal duty on all directors to hammer home to them their responsibility,” she demanded.