CULTURA DE S DE AMÉRICA' DA GUERRA NÃO UMA EDIÇÃO ESTA ELEIÇÃO
Por Sherwood Ross | Uma edição que os povos americanos provavelmente não estão indo se ouvir aproximadamente nesta campanha presidencial é como parar o complexo militar-industrial (MIC) de destruir este país, de bankrupting o moral e financeira.
Nenhuma matéria que cada dia de passagem traz algum revelation novo do mismanagement e do desperdício brutos do Pentagon, da violação do tratado ou dos crimes de encontro ao humanity, é um tópico nenhum candidato para que os desafios brancos da casa broach a fim de que não ou sejam julgados “naïve” ou “macia” no assunto da defesa.
Ainda, o MIC estão funcionando esta nação na terra, estão sugando trillions dos dólares fora carteiras dos taxpayers' e estão colocando o desperdício aos setores civis na necessidade urgente do reparo e da regeneração.
O MIC são uma besta sem um coração, sem compassion. Empreenderá a guerra em qualquer lugar no mundo, em toda a mentira ou pretext, emitindo milhares ou milhões a suas mortes. É devoid do morality; não aprendeu nada dos ensinos religiosos exceto o bordo-serviço; e seus empregados civis vão a seus trabalhos que manufaturam armas nucleares e portadores de avião como se plantavam pomares de maçã ou levantavam flores.
Quando o Pentagon estava sob a construção, os membros do armário de Roosevelt questionaram a sabedoria de trazer junto sob um telhado os escritórios militares numerosos dispersados em torno de Washington, C.C. Temeram a consolidação impending de poders martial awesome em uma das estruturas as mais grandes na terra; preocuparam-se, demasiado, que a máquina da guerra pôde fazer exame em uma vida do seus próprios. Tràgica, seus medos foram transformados sobre os anos na realidade feia de hoje.
Como James Carroll escreve na “casa da guerra” (Houghton Mifflin), por 1965 quase 6 milhão americanos foram empregados em Pentagon-funcionam empresas. Apesar de tudo, nos 20 anos que seguem a segunda guerra mundial, “o Pentagon gastou quase $100 bilhão, dez vezes as despesas federais devotadas a todos os aspectos da saúde, instrução, e bem-estar no mesmo período.”
Por 1997, por pai a activista anti-war de Philip Berrigan, humanitário e, poderia dizer o juiz que o sentenciaria logo a dois anos na prisão para derramar o sangue em uns ESTADOS UNIDOS. navio de guerra: “Os Estados Unidos gastaram quatorze trillion dólares nos braços desde 1946. Our government has intervened in the affairs of fifty nations and has violated the laws of God and humanity by designing, deploying, using, and threatening to use atomic weapons.”
Carroll sees it in much the same light: “The Pentagon is now the dead center of an open-ended martial enterprise that no longer pretends to be defense…the Pentagon has, more than ever, become a place to fear.” “What the Bush administration has done,” Carroll writes, “is to lay bare the real character of the ‘disastrous rise’ of Pentagon power of which Eisenhower warned in 1961. In Iraq, despite America’s overwhelming military might, there will be no winning ever.”
Carroll’s words sound more prophetic each time another general testifies the Pentagon is “making progress” but the situation remains “fragile” and so we must stay on an on. Two years ago Carroll literally predicted Senator John McCain’s comment about staying in Iraq for a hundred years if need be, writing, “there will be no winning ever. Whether the U.S. occupation is terminated abruptly or is maintained for years, violence and mayhem will define Iraq indefinitely, while the rest of the Middle East copes with Iraqi-spawned waves of chaos.”
McCain says, if elected, he will be out of Iraq by 2013, but as Senator Joseph Biden pointed out in a recent talk carried on C-Span, McCain gave no specifics. And so one begins to suspect the goal in Iraq is not necessarily to win a war but to make war again and again, forever and a day, so the MIC can prosper while non-defense sectors starve, so that government contractors can erect a monster embassy in Baghdad and huge, permanent military bases nearby to dominate the oil-rich Middle East.
Carroll writes the U.S. under President Bush has “normalized” war: “Not noted by most Americans, a new archipelago of U.S. military bases stretched across the Middle East into the heart of the former Soviet Union…Such forward basing of forces was designed to control, by means of ‘regime change’ and ‘prevention,’ emerging political trends around the globe, with the unabashed goal of guaranteeing U.S. dominance everywhere.” (America operates about 1,000 military bases at home and more than 700 overseas.)
“Such a strategy,” Carroll goes on to write, “assumes not only the possession of unparalleled military power but the display of it and the ready use of it. Under George W. Bush, a self-styled war president, ‘the normalization of war’ was thus established.”
What’s more, Carroll writes, under former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the Pentagon in 2002 embarked “on the stunning project of developing a new generation of nuclear weapons including a burrowing device designed to go after underground targets and ‘mini-nukes’ to be used in concert with a conventional attack.”
The effect of all this, Carroll writes, “is to legitimize nuclear-based power politics, giving other nations, friend and foe alike, compelling reasons to acquire a nuclear capacity, if only for deterrence, and prompting them to behave in similar ways.”
Carroll says the U.S. return to nuclear development was to spur Iran and North Korea to become nuclear-capable and to make states that renounced the atom—such as Brazil, Egypt, South Africa— rethink that decision. Meanwhile, Carroll says, Russia, China, Israel, India and Pakistan “are all furiously adding to their nuclear arsenals” and “The Pentagon has become the engine of proliferation.”
If the public hasn’t figured it out yet, the United States of America cannot go on this way forever, spending nearly half of every tax dollar on war. Besides the tragedy of our own 4,000 killed and 30,000 wounded in a deceitful war for oil, and the tragedy of perhaps 1 million Iraqis killed and a million more wounded, and four million forced from their homes, and their nation in ruins, the Bush regime has also turned much of the world against America and American brands. Soon, Americans workers and their families may be suffering economically as they never have since the Great Depression.
And the tyrannosaurus Rex in the family room smashing our domestic tranquility is the MIC. President Eisenhower had the guts to warn us of it. Senator McCain is a traveling salesman for it. And Senator Obama remains to be heard from. Yo, Senator Obama!
Have Your Say: AMERICA’S CULTURE OF WAR NOT AN ISSUE THIS ELECTION
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report here.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 8th, 2008 at 11:52 am and is filed under Contributions & Guests . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Translations
Loading ...Related News
- Former Reagan aide: ‘Brownshirt’ Bush among top ‘mass murderers of all time’
- US prepping military options against Iran
- Bush World War III rant shows he’s really lost it now
- Charlie Rose Interview with the President of Iran
- US generals planning revolt over Iran
Email This Page To A Friend
Latest Headlines
- The corporate takeover of ‘reason’ and ‘science’
- Could Coca Cola Distribution Network Save Children’s Lives?
- Iraq demands ‘clear timeline’ for US withdrawal
- Why the Drug War is a Crime against Humanity Explained
- Tape: Top CIA official confesses order to forge Iraq-9/11 letter came on White House stationery
- State and Local Prosecutors Can Take Down Bush
- HOO U GONNA COAL?
- New Book Reveals What You Aren’t Supposed To Know
- F.B.I. Says It Obtained Reporters’ Phone Records
- Class War Reply To The New Statesman
More Breaking News
Archive
