2 Responses to “9/11 Cultwatch in Dumfries”第2響應“ 9 / 11 Cultwatch在鄧弗里斯”

1. Maximus V 馬克西穆斯V Posted: Nov 12th, 2008 at 8:34 pm 發布時間： 2008年11月一十二日在下午8時34分

   What we need are some more labels like “Left/liberal” and “Truthers” and “Truth movement”.我們需要的是更多的標籤，如“左/自由主義”和“ Truthers ”和“真理運動” 。 Clearly this individual believes the official story which is this:顯然，這個人認為，官方的故事是這樣的： 19 fanatical Muslim Terrorist,controlled by a man who lives in a cave, hijacked 4 large jets with box cutters and the threat of a bomb, and all on the same day defeated the US & NATO air defence with almost 100 % success, not once, but 4 times in the same 24 hour day, and not a single defence jet intercepted despite the hijackings being known about for considerable time and having altrady hit both twin towers was able to fully penetrate Pentagon airspace and slam into the Pentagon after hitting down 30 ft light polls and flying just feet off the ground for at least 1/4 mile defying all known laws of aerodynamics. 19狂熱的穆斯林恐怖主義，控制誰一個人生活在一個山洞裡，被劫持飛機第4大箱刀具和威脅有炸彈，而所有在同一天擊敗了美國和北約的防空，幾乎100 ％的成功，不是一次，但4次在同一天24小時，而不是一個單一的國防射流截獲儘管劫持事件是了解的相當多的時間和altrady擊中了這兩個雙塔是能夠充分滲透五角大樓的領空和撞擊五角大樓盤中下跌了30英尺輕調查和飛行只是腳離地面至少1 / 4英里藐視所有已知的空氣動力學的法律。 In addition two of the alleged DEAD hijackers still fly for Saudi Airlines and Osmar Binladen (they guy in the cave) has still not been indited for 911 because there is absolutely NO evidence according to the FBI & CIA.另外兩名劫機者據稱死仍然飛往沙特航空公司和奧斯馬爾Binladen （傢伙，他們在洞穴裡）尚未indited為911 ，因為是絕對沒有根據的證據，聯邦調查局和中央情報局。 Its a BIG FAT FACT - Osmar Binladen as of 12 November 2008 is still only a Suspect for the attacks of 911.它是一種盛大的事實-奧斯馬爾B inladen截至2 008年1 1月1 2號依然只是一個犯罪嫌疑人的襲擊事件9 11。 So under these circumstances, seeing as it is more than 7 years and still the guilty party who financed and planned 911 have not been indited, is it not only right and proper to have a second impartial investigation to add all the new evidence of which has come to light since the first 911 Omission Report which omitted 130 + rescue workers statements from the so called inquiry because they did not support the official pack of lies which were used by the Bush regime to illegally attack Afghanistan despite the key suspect not even being indited, not even to this day.因此，在這種情況下，看到因為它是超過7年，仍然是有罪的一方誰資助和911計劃尚未indited ，是不是唯一正確的和適當的第二個公正的調查，以添加所有新的證據，其中有曝光以來的第一次911疏漏報告，其中省略130 +救援人員的陳述所謂的調查，因為他們不支持的官方騙人的鬼話其中所使用的布什政權非法攻擊，儘管阿富汗的主要嫌疑人甚至不被indited ，甚至沒有這一天。 If this writer has absolutely ANY credible evidence Osmar Binladen actually DID 911 he should give it to the FBI and CIA because - - they have ZERO!如果這個作家絕對任何可信的證據奧斯馬爾Binladen的確911他應該提供給美國聯邦調查局和中央情報局的，因為--他們零！ And if he can’t provide the EVIDENCE - what does that say about this article???而且，如果他不能提供證據-這是什麼說對這篇文章？ ？ ？ Reply回复 | Quote selected text報價選定的文本 | Link to this鏈接到本

2. Phracktivist Phracktivist Posted: Nov 13th, 2008 at 5:09 am 發布時間： 08年11月一十三日在上午05點09分

   Maximus V, I think you’re forgetting a few details…馬克西穆斯五，我想你忘了一些細節... 1) These fanatics overpowered former military officers, with box cutters 1 ）這些狂熱分子制服前軍官，與中剪子 2) At a minimum, the fanatics that flew into the Pentagon performed aeronautical manoeuvres that top military pilots have said would be nearly impossible for someone of their skill level 2 ）在最低限度，狂熱的飛進五角大樓進行航空演習的最高軍事飛行員們說，將是幾乎不可能有人對他們的技能水平 3) These pilots in particular were called “dumb and dumber” by their flying instructor and could barely handle a cesna 3 ）這些飛行員特別是被稱為“啞和阿瓜”他們的飛行教官和幾乎無法處理cesna 4) Coincidentally - just like on 7/7, OKC, and Pearl Harbor (at a minimum, according to official sources) - there was a training exercise/war game in progress of the very same thing happening which delayed official response and noticeably confused air traffic controllers. 4 ）巧合-就像在7 / 7 ，囊腫，並珍珠港（在最低限度，根據官方的消息來源） -有一個訓練演習/戰爭遊戲中取得的進展非常同樣的事情發生推遲了正式答复，並明顯地混淆空中交通管制。 5) A minimum of 4 hijackers have turned up to be alive and well in another country. 5 ）至少4劫機者已經出現，還活著，並在另一個國家。 Despite excuses based on conjecture, the FBI has told the BBC that they are positive that the individuals they named and later presented on Television are the right ones even though this is physically impossible儘管藉口猜想的基礎上，聯邦調查局已經告訴BBC說，他們是積極的，他們的個人命名，後來提出電視是正確的，即使這是不可能 6) To clarify, the FBI has said that they “do not have enough evidence” to blame the attacks on Bin Laden. 6 ）為了澄清，聯邦調查局已經表示，他們“沒有足夠的證據”指責襲擊本拉丹。 7) Kean, and others from the Kean/911 Commission have said that they were set up to fail from the beginning and there was much obstruction to their inquiries. 7 ）基恩和其他從Kean/911委員會說，他們成立了失敗從一開始就存在許多阻礙其調查。 That is all :)這就是： ） I think that when people start on their pseudo-scientific theories about 9/11 Truth and the individuals that make it up, they should take a long, hard look at people like Robert Steele who defy all of their pathetic, made-up stereotypes.我想，當人們開始對他們的偽科學理論， 9 / 11事件的真相和個人，使之上升時，他們應考慮一個長期，艱苦看看這樣的人羅伯特斯蒂爾誰藐視所有的可悲，取得的成見。 Here we have a former US spy of 20 years, an absolute expert on the issue of national intelligence, who originally came from the position that there was no 9/11 conspiracy only to change his mind “sadly” after reviewing the evidence for himself.在這裡，我們有一個前美國間諜的20年中，以絕對的專家對這個問題的國家情報，原來是誰的立場，沒有9 / 11陰謀只有他改變主意“可悲的”審查後，為自己的證據。 Reply回复 | Quote selected text報價選定的文本 | Link to this鏈接到本