RINF.COM: Η ΣΠΑΖΟΝΤΑΣ ΕΝΑΛΛΑΚΤΙΚΗ ΛΎΣΗ ΕΙΔΗΣΕΩΝ
|
|
ΣΠΑΖΟΝΤΑΣ ΕΙΔΗΣΕΙΣ |
Εργασία χάραξης πολιτικών διοίκησης των Μπους λιγότερο ασφαλής
Δευτέρα, 28η Απριλίου 2008
Ήταν 18 Απριλίου, τρεις ημέρες πριν από την Πενσυλβανία αρχική. Εμφανίστηκε ακριβώς πέντε ημέρες μετά από διοχέτευση με σωλήνες συντριμμένο Jaren Τ. Hoover στο θάνατο στο εργοστάσιο σωλήνων dura-δεσμών, επίσης σε Steelton. Ήταν 19. Η ζωή συνεχίστηκε. Ο πατέρας του Jaren, ένας κοινός δικαστής αιτήσεων της Πενσυλβανίας, βρήκε τις δωδεκάδες των φίλων του γιου του στην κηδεία, που πενθούν, και που κάνουν ποια κατσίκια τώρα, η οποία είναι μετα μνημεία σε MySpace. Η σύζυγος του Ρότζερ Prichard είπε σε έναν τοπικό δημοσιογράφο ότι ο σύζυγός της ήταν καλό πρόσωπο πατέρων και συζύγων και αγάπης, προτού να υπερνικηθεί επίσης για να συνεχίσει. Τα εγγόνια του δεν θα γνωρίσουν ποτέ να τον ξέρουν. Δεδομένου ότι οι προεδρικοί υποψήφιοι αναγκάζονται επανειλημμένα να εστιάσουν στον επιπόλαιο - εάν Χίλαρυ επινόησε να φωνάξει ή γέλασε πάρα πολύ δυνατός ή εάν Obama που εξυπηρετήθηκε μιά φορά σε ένα διοικητικό συμβούλιο με έναν άνοστο χαρακτήρα - τα πραγματικά ζητήματα όπως την ομοσπονδιακή επιβολή της ασφάλειας εργασιακών χώρων αγνοούνται εντελώς. Δευτέρα, 28 Απριλίου, εντούτοις, είναι παραμέρισμα μιας ημέρας για να επικεντρωθούν ζωές αποταμίευσης των εργαζομένων». Είναι αναμνηστική ημέρα εργαζομένων. Είναι μια περίπτωση στην οποία πενθούμε τους νεκρούς και προσπαθούμε για τους καλύτερους όρους για τη διαβίωση. Κάτω από τη διοίκηση των Μπους, αυτό δεν είναι παρά μια προσπάθεια. Εδώ είναι μια στατιστική αφήγησης: ο αριθμός θανάτων εργασιακών χώρων αυξήθηκε από το 2005 ως το 2006, το τελευταίο πλήρες έτος για το οποίο οι αριθμοί είναι διαθέσιμοι. Από 106. Το σύνολο για το 2005 ήταν 5.734 νεκρά στις ΗΠΑ. Το επόμενο έτος, ανήλθε σε 5.840. Κατά τη διάρκεια των έξι ετών της διοίκησης των Μπους για την οποία υπάρχουν στατιστικές, ο αριθμός θανάτων αυξήθηκε τέσσερις φορές. Οι θάνατοι αναρριχήθηκαν τόσο σε υψηλό από το 2003 ως το 2004 που το ποσοστό αύξησε πραγματικά, ο πρώτος χρόνος που έχει εμφανιστεί - κατά τη διάρκεια είτε μιας δημοκρατικής είτε δημοκρατικής διοίκησης - από το 1970 όταν πέρασε το συνέδριο την πράξη που δημιουργεί τη Διοίκηση ασφάλειας και υγιεινής στην εργασία (OSHA) για να βελτιώσει την ασφάλεια εργασιακών χώρων. Κάθε ημέρα το 2006, 16 εργαζόμενοι πέθαναν στην εργασία. This was not from heart attacks or strokes. This was from traumatic workplace injuries — because they suffocated when pits they were digging collapsed with sides not properly shored up, or because they plummeted from construction sites lacking safety gear to stop the fall, or because dust that should not have been accumulating in the factory air exploded. Workplace safety has the same problem as car safety. No one much pays attention to individuals like Jaren T. Hoover and Roger H. Prichard, just like they don’t pay much attention to single car accidents killing a person here and there on the highway. The public does notice, however, when a plane crashes or when a crane topples over in Manhattan, killing six construction workers all at once, or when a disaster in a mine in West Virginia suffocates 12 Sago workers. Unfortunately, the vast majority of deaths occur one-by-one, and so, in the resulting lack of public outrage and uproar afterward, the Bush Administration has, over the past seven years, managed to de-fund OSHA, the agency responsible for keeping workers safe and dismantle its regulation structure. Since George W. Bush took office and decided that a policy of government and business cooperating like good ‘ole boys to enforce rules should replace the former inspection structure, OSHA’s budget has been cut by $25 million and its staff by nearly 200 positions. A report by the AFL-CIO Safety and Health Office, called, “Death on the Job, The Toll of Neglect” calculates that with OSHA’s current number of inspectors, it would take the agency 133 years to examine each workplace under its jurisdiction just once. So don’t expect OSHA to show up to check your employer real soon, no matter how bad things are. The report puts the situation this way: “When it comes to job safety enforcement and coverage, it is clear that OSHA lacks sufficient resources to protect workers adequately.” Well, surely then, when something happens, like a workplace crushing death, OSHA responds by smacking down the recalcitrant employer with a big fine to get them in line, right? Wrong. In 2007, serious violations of the act — an infraction is deemed serious if it poses a substantial probability of death or major physical harm — carried an average fine of $909. For a fatality, the average penalty was $10,133. And that number is unusually high. In the previous four years, the fines averaged $6,100. The AFL-CIO report authors expect the 2007 number to shrink after companies successfully appeal larger fines levied against them. Barring good use of inspections and fines, there’s another enforcement tool that could keep workers safe. That would be criminally prosecuting employers whose engage in egregious behavior, like removing or disabling safety devices on dangerous equipment. In Canada, workers will toll a bell during their Workers Memorial Day commemorations for Steve L’Ecuyer, a 23-year-old crushed to death by a machine after his employer, Transpave, Inc. deliberately disabled a safety device intended to prevent such an accident. There, Transpave was found criminally negligent and fined $110,000. Here, the Department of Labor referred ten cases to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution in 2007. The number is limited because the kinds of cases are restricted under current U.S. law. They may only be instances in which Labor found that an employer’s willful violation of regulation resulted in a worker’s death or where false statements were made. If there’s a conviction, the penalties are also limited — a maximum of six months in jail. Even so, the Justice Department has taken action on none of the referred cases. Not one. No wonder 106 more people failed to come home from work in 2006 than in 2005. Work is less safe. Monday is the day to protest that. It is the day to demand safety in the names of Roger H. Prichard and Jaren T. Hoover and all of the others who did not come home. See More:Bush Law USA NewsHave Your Say: Bush Administration Policies Making Work Less Safe Please note, only selected comments will be published. Or discuss this report in our our new forums This entry was posted on Monday, April 28th, 2008 at 4:03 am and is filed under Business News, Opinion, Political News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. |
Translations![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
5 LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
The Surveillance Society Does Not Work US Navy Deploys Around Latin America Iran rejects nuclear inspections unless Israel allows them The Pentagon vs. America Poll: Bush most unpopular in modern history Iraq 'Divide and Rule' Strategy Called Shortsighted The Challenge Of Modern Slavery The New Whopper: Burger with a Side of Spies Abuse Claims Mount Against Pentagon, Contractors Report: U.S. Not as 'Free' as Touted Bush backs modified crops Brian Haw Arrested Again - SOCPA 3.5 Million Tons of Plastic Floating in the Pacific |
James Burnham commented on: The Pentagon vs. America This is an excellent article. The need for true patriots to serve in the military is multiplied by the rise of private contracting firms. The private ranks are filled with some... Continue Reading & Reply Alex commented on: British army faces new torture claims i think its a shame that a select few disgraced servicemen have brought such shame to the British military. i think that the Army cna function perfectly without such extreme... Continue Reading & Reply Chatham commented on: VIDEO: Religio-Fascist thought police at work _cassanove When you come face to face with your maker and realize you rejected Lord of Lords, hell will be all that awaits you! Continue Reading & Reply whistler commented on: Iran rejects nuclear inspections unless Israel allows them Why? simple really…Th e USA does not like to be on equal ground with other countries. The United States has the “biggest stick”,... Continue Reading & Reply Temm commented on: Depleted Uranium. A Scientific Perspective I think that the Hanford Nuclear site is really REALLY bad and it damaged so much… obviosly. If you disagree, you are obviosly un-educated. Continue Reading & Reply |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |