RINF.COM : THE BREAKING NEWS ALTERNATIVE rinf.com ：突發新聞的替代 Tuesday, June 24th, 2008週二， 2008年6月24日 |  |
Breaking News 突發新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭和恐怖主義新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁 | |
BREAKING NEWS 突發新聞 |
Big Oil’s Big Lie大型石油公司的大謊言 Tuesday, June 24th, 2008 週二， 2008年6月24日 By通過 George Monbiot喬治monbiot | Of course, it’s not a crime, and it’s hard to see how, in a free society, it could or should become one. |當然，它不是一個犯罪的，它的努力，看看如何，在一個自由的社會，它可以或應該成為一。 But the culpability of the energy firms the climate scientist James Hansen但懲罰能源公司的氣候科學家詹姆斯漢森 will indict將起訴 in在…內 his testimony他的證詞 to Congress today is clear.向國會今天是明確的。 If we fail to stop runaway climate change, it will be largely because of campaigning by oil, coal and electricity companies, and the network of lobbyists, fake experts and thinktanks they have sponsored.如果我們不能停止離家出走的氣候變化，這將是主要是因為競選活動，由石油，煤炭和電力公司，和網絡說客，假專家和thinktanks他們贊助。 The operation sprang directly from Big Tobacco’s war against science.運作興起直接從大煙草的戰爭，反科學。 It has used the same fake experts, the same public relations companies and the same tactics:它使用了同樣的假專家，同公關公司和相同的策略： as I showed正如我表明， in my book在我的書 Heat加熱 , the campaign against action on climate change was partly launched by the tobacco company Philip Morris. ，運動就氣候變化採取行動，部分是由煙草公司菲利普莫里斯公司。 But while the tobacco companies’ professional liars were smoked out by a massive class action in the US, the sponsored climate change deniers still have massive influence over public perception.不過，儘管煙草公司的專業說謊者被熏由一個龐大的集體訴訟在美國，贊助氣候變化deniers仍然有龐大的影響力，公眾的看法。 A survey一項調查 published yesterday昨天公佈的 by the Observer shows that six out of ten people in Britain agreed that “many scientific experts still question if humans are contributing to climate change.” This is an inaccurate perception, which results from Big Energy’s lobbying.由觀察表明，六出10人在英國一致認為， “許多科學專家仍然質疑，如果人類作出貢獻的氣候變化” ，這是不正確的看法，結果從大能源的遊說。 Almost without exception, the scientists who claim to doubt that manmade climate change is taking place fall into two categories: either they are not qualified in the branch of science they are discussing or they have received money from fossil fuel companies.幾乎毫無例外，科學家們誰索賠懷疑人為氣候變化正在發生可分為兩類：要么他們是沒有資格在該分行的科學，他們正在討論或他們收到的錢從礦物燃料的公司。 Of all the self-professed climate “sceptics”, I have been able to find only one –所有的自我professed氣候“懷疑論者” ，我一直能找到只有一個- Dr John Christy醫生約翰克里斯蒂 of the University of Alabama – who has relevant qualifications and who does not appear to have received fees from lobby groups or thinktanks sponsored by the energy companies.該亞拉巴馬大學-誰具有相關資格，誰似乎沒有收到費用由遊說團體或t hinktanks主辦，並由能源公司。 But even he has had to admit that the figures on which he based his claims were the results of “errors in the … data”.不過，即使他已不得不承認的數字，他基於他的索賠結果“的錯誤，在數據… ” 。 The others are the very opposite of sceptics.別人是很相反，抱懷疑態度。 Many of them are paid to start with a conclusion – that climate change isn’t happening or isn’t important – then to find data and arguments to support it.他們很多是支付給開始與一個結論-即氣候變化是不會發生的事情或並不重要-然後找到的數據和論據支持。 In most cases, they cherrypick scientific findings; in a few cases, like the fake scientific paper attached to the celebrated在大多數情況下，他們cherrypick科學發現;在少數情況下，像假科學論文附加到慶祝 Oregon petition俄勒岡州的請願書 , they make them up altogether. ，他們使他們完全。 But people who don’t understand the difference between a peer-reviewed paper and a pamphlet are taken in. The energy companies’ propaganda campaign is amplified by scientific illiterates in the media, such as Melanie Phillips, Christopher Booker, Nigel Lawson, Alexander Cockburn and the television producer (who made Channel 4’s documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle) Martin Durkin.但是，人們誰不明白之間的區別同儕審查的文件和一本小冊子，採取英寸的能源公司的宣傳活動，是擴增的科學文盲，在媒體上，如梅蘭妮菲利普斯，克里斯托弗布克，奈傑爾勞森，亞歷山大科伯恩和電視製作（誰提出的第4頻道的紀錄片偉大的全球氣候變暖的騙局）李柱銘durkin 。 I don’t believe that the energy companies should be prosecuted for commissioning the truckload of trash their sponsored experts publish.我不相信能源公司應該被起訴委託卡車的垃圾，他們贊助的專家公佈。 But their campaign of disinformation must be exposed again and again.但他們的運動，造謠，必須予以曝光，一次又一次。 Like the tobacco lobbyists, they are not only delaying essential public action; they also create the impression that science is for sale to the highest bidder.像煙草說客，他們不僅拖延必要的公共行動，他們也造成一種印象，認為科學是出售給出價最高者。 The awful truth is that sometimes it is.可怕的事實是，有時是。 See More: 看到更多的： Oil 石油 World News 世界新聞Have Your Say: Big Oil’s Big Lie 你說：大型石油公司的大謊言 Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。 Or discuss this report in our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的新論壇 This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 24th, 2008 at 6:03 pm and is filed under 此項目被張貼於週二， 2008年6月24日在下午6時03分，並提交下 Business News 商業新聞 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反應，此項目通過 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 餵養。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回應 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 從你自己的網站。 | Translations 翻譯               Free Newsletter 免費通訊 Related News 相關新聞
Email This Page To A Friend 電子郵件此頁給朋友 Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題
More更多 Breaking News突發新聞 Archive 存檔
|
About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員 |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 所表達的意見，在rinf新聞電線和通訊是唯一的責任作者（ S ）和並不一定反映的意見，網站管理員。 RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. rinf.com ：突破新聞與其他的媒體是copyleft的-複製及分發自由。 News Forum 新聞論壇 |
