RINF.COM : THE BREAKING NEWS ALTERNATIVE rinf.com ：突发新闻的替代 Tuesday, June 24th, 2008周二， 2008年6月24日 |  |
Breaking News 突发新闻 | | Forum 论坛 | | UK News 英国新闻 | | USA News 美国新闻 | | World News 世界新闻 | | Political News 政治新闻 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新闻 | | War & Terrorism News 战争和恐怖主义新闻 | | Sports News 体育新闻 | | Multimedia 多媒体 | | Set Homepage 设为首页 | |
BREAKING NEWS 突发新闻 |
Big Oil’s Big Lie大型石油公司的大谎言 Tuesday, June 24th, 2008 周二， 2008年6月24日 By通过 George Monbiot乔治monbiot | Of course, it’s not a crime, and it’s hard to see how, in a free society, it could or should become one. |当然，它不是一个犯罪的，它的努力，看看如何，在一个自由的社会，它可以或应该成为一。 But the culpability of the energy firms the climate scientist James Hansen但惩罚能源公司的气候科学家詹姆斯汉森 will indict将起诉 in在…内 his testimony他的证词 to Congress today is clear.向国会今天是明确的。 If we fail to stop runaway climate change, it will be largely because of campaigning by oil, coal and electricity companies, and the network of lobbyists, fake experts and thinktanks they have sponsored.如果我们不能停止离家出走的气候变化，这将是主要是因为竞选活动，由石油，煤炭和电力公司，和网络说客，假专家和thinktanks他们赞助。 The operation sprang directly from Big Tobacco’s war against science.运作兴起直接从大烟草的战争，反科学。 It has used the same fake experts, the same public relations companies and the same tactics:它使用了同样的假专家，同公关公司和相同的策略： as I showed正如我表明， in my book在我的书 Heat加热 , the campaign against action on climate change was partly launched by the tobacco company Philip Morris. ，运动就气候变化采取行动，部分是由烟草公司菲利普莫里斯公司。 But while the tobacco companies’ professional liars were smoked out by a massive class action in the US, the sponsored climate change deniers still have massive influence over public perception.不过，尽管烟草公司的专业说谎者被熏由一个庞大的集体诉讼在美国，赞助气候变化deniers仍然有庞大的影响力，公众的看法。 A survey一项调查 published yesterday昨天公布的 by the Observer shows that six out of ten people in Britain agreed that “many scientific experts still question if humans are contributing to climate change.” This is an inaccurate perception, which results from Big Energy’s lobbying.由观察表明，六出10人在英国一致认为， “许多科学专家仍然质疑，如果人类作出贡献的气候变化” ，这是不正确的看法，结果从大能源的游说。 Almost without exception, the scientists who claim to doubt that manmade climate change is taking place fall into two categories: either they are not qualified in the branch of science they are discussing or they have received money from fossil fuel companies.几乎毫无例外，科学家们谁索赔怀疑人为气候变化正在发生可分为两类：要么他们是没有资格在该分行的科学，他们正在讨论或他们收到的钱从矿物燃料的公司。 Of all the self-professed climate “sceptics”, I have been able to find only one –所有的自我professed气候“怀疑论者” ，我一直能找到只有一个- Dr John Christy医生约翰克里斯蒂 of the University of Alabama – who has relevant qualifications and who does not appear to have received fees from lobby groups or thinktanks sponsored by the energy companies.该亚拉巴马大学-谁具有相关资格，谁似乎没有收到费用由游说团体或t hinktanks主办，并由能源公司。 But even he has had to admit that the figures on which he based his claims were the results of “errors in the … data”.不过，即使他已不得不承认的数字，他基于他的索赔结果“的错误，在数据… ” 。 The others are the very opposite of sceptics.别人是很相反，抱怀疑态度。 Many of them are paid to start with a conclusion – that climate change isn’t happening or isn’t important – then to find data and arguments to support it.他们很多是支付给开始与一个结论-即气候变化是不会发生的事情或并不重要-然后找到的数据和论据支持。 In most cases, they cherrypick scientific findings; in a few cases, like the fake scientific paper attached to the celebrated在大多数情况下，他们cherrypick科学发现;在少数情况下，像假科学论文附加到庆祝 Oregon petition俄勒冈州的请愿书 , they make them up altogether. ，他们使他们完全。 But people who don’t understand the difference between a peer-reviewed paper and a pamphlet are taken in. The energy companies’ propaganda campaign is amplified by scientific illiterates in the media, such as Melanie Phillips, Christopher Booker, Nigel Lawson, Alexander Cockburn and the television producer (who made Channel 4’s documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle) Martin Durkin.但是，人们谁不明白之间的区别同侪审查的文件和一本小册子，采取英寸的能源公司的宣传活动，是扩增的科学文盲，在媒体上，如梅兰妮菲利普斯，克里斯托弗布克，奈杰尔劳森，亚历山大科伯恩和电视制作（谁提出的第4频道的纪录片伟大的全球气候变暖的骗局）李柱铭durkin 。 I don’t believe that the energy companies should be prosecuted for commissioning the truckload of trash their sponsored experts publish.我不相信能源公司应该被起诉委托卡车的垃圾，他们赞助的专家公布。 But their campaign of disinformation must be exposed again and again.但他们的运动，造谣，必须予以曝光，一次又一次。 Like the tobacco lobbyists, they are not only delaying essential public action; they also create the impression that science is for sale to the highest bidder.像烟草说客，他们不仅拖延必要的公共行动，他们也造成一种印象，认为科学是出售给出价最高者。 The awful truth is that sometimes it is.可怕的事实是，有时是。 See More: 看到更多的： Oil 石油 World News 世界新闻Have Your Say: Big Oil’s Big Lie 你说：大型石油公司的大谎言 Please note, only selected comments will be published.请注意，只有选定的评论将出版。 Or discuss this report in our new forums 或讨论这个报告在我们的新论坛 This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 24th, 2008 at 6:03 pm and is filed under 此项目被张贴于周二， 2008年6月24日在下午6时03分，并提交下 Business News 商业新闻 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反应，此项目通过 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 喂养。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回应 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 从你自己的网站。 | Translations 翻译               Free Newsletter 免费通讯 Related News 相关新闻
Email This Page To A Friend 电子邮件此页给朋友 Latest Headlines 最新的新闻标题
More更多 Breaking News突发新闻 Archive 存档
|
About 大约 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 评语 | | Special Guests 特别来宾 | | Webmasters 网站管理员 |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 所表达的意见，在rinf新闻电线和通讯是唯一的责任作者（ S ）和并不一定反映的意见，网站管理员。 RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. rinf.com ：突破新闻与其他的媒体是copyleft的-复制及分发自由。 News Forum 新闻论坛 |
