White House presses for strike against Syria despite possible surrender of chemical weapons



Published time: September 09, 2013 19:38

Reuters / Mario Tama

The White House remains adamant about having Congress authorize the use of military force against the Syrian government, even as that country’s leader is reportedly weighing a deal that would involve relinquishing a stock pile of chemical weapons.

Notwithstanding reports that Russia has asked Syria to surrender
an arsenal of chemical warheads to avoid a likely military strike
from the United States, White House press secretary Jay Carney
said Monday that lawmakers in Washington should continue to
consider President Barack Obama’s request to launch an attack
against the regime of Syria’s Bashar al-Assad.

Speaking during a White House press conference Monday afternoon,
Carney told reporters that he hopes the members of the House of
Representatives and Senate agree to authorize a strike against
Assad in retaliation of the August 21 gassing of civilians
outside of Damascus. American officials say Assad and his forces
are responsible for that attack and should be reprimanded for
killing more than 1,400 Syrians.

Carney’s remarks came only hours after officials in both Russia
and Syria said they were working towards relinquishing that
stockpile of weapons. Despite a potential negotiation, however,
Carney urged lawmakers to move quickly towards approving an
attack.

Earlier Monday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said he
was asking Syrian authorities to surrender their chemical weapons to
international control to be destroyed. His Syrian counterpart,
Walid al-Muallem, responded shortly after by saying his government
welcomes Russia’s initiative.”

We will work with the Russians and speak to them,” Carney
said later that day, adding, “We would have some skepticism
about the Assad regime’s credibility
.”

Those remarks mirrored statements made earlier in the day by
State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf, who said “Clearly we
have some serious skepticism
” about reports involving Assad’s
cooperation.

Even if Assad agrees to surrender those weapons, Carney said, the
White House is weary that his regime will in fact relinquish all
their warheads.

Assad has refused to even acknowledge that he possesses
chemical weapons, which of course the whole world knows he does.
The whole world knows he’s using them
,” Carney said.

We have to be mindful of the failure of the Assad regime for
so long now, 20 years, to sign the Chemical Weapons
Convention
,” Carney added, referencing the international
prohibition against that category of warheads. “This is not a
history of promises being kept
.”

Should Syria agree to the details presented by Russia, Lavrov
said it would also require that Assad joins the Chemical Weapons
Convention. According to Carney, though, Congress should not wait
to see what outcome emerges from any talks between Syria and
Russia, but rather authorize a strike as quickly as possible.

So while we have these conversations,” Carney said,
…we will continue with our efforts in Congress.”

Later in the briefing, Carney said that any sort of deal being
brokered between Syria and Russia would occur only as a result of
a potentially impending attack from US forces.

We need to make clear to Assad as well as the Russians and
others that we are very serious about the need to response
,”
he said. “We must continue to keep the pressure on the Assad
regime with the threat of US military action because it is
precisely that threat that has even led to this kind of
proposal
.”

If Assad believes that there is no threat of retaliation for
his use of chemical weapons, it’s hard to imagine he will
suddenly volunteer to give them up
,” Carney concluded.

Following Carney’s remarks, former secretary of state Hillary
Clinton said cooperation on Assad’s part would be an
important step.” Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California),
the chairperson of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said she
would “welcome such a move” from Assad’s army.

Copyright: RT