RINF.COM: EL ALTERNATIVA DE LAS NOTICIAS QUE SE ROMPE
Domingo 20 de julio de 2008
RINF.COM: EL ALTERNATIVA DE LAS NOTICIAS QUE SE ROMPE
|
|
ROMPER NOTICIAS |
No van a trabar para arriba el Rove, ayudante anterior de Bush insisten
Lunes 14 de julio de 2008 Discuta este informe en los foros de RINF > Por David Edwards y Muriel Kane | Representante. Sanchez: El Rove se debe “sostener responsable de su indiferencia completa de la ley”. Karl Rove rechazado esta semana a atestiguar antes de congreso sobre el procesamiento político-motivado del gobernador anterior de Alabama pone Siegelman. Un subcomité del comité judicial de la casa ahora ha votado de forma aplastante para rechazar la demanda del Rove que pues un “consejero cercano anterior al presidente” él es “constitucional inmune” de tener que atestiguar. Davis Shuster de MSNBC pidió el representante. Linda Sanchez (DCA), silla de ese subcomité, qué el comité judicial hará después. “El paso siguiente estaría para que el comité completo tome la recomendación del desprecio,” Sanchez indicado, a “que Chairman Conyers me he dicho que él esté impaciente por hacer, y de ella iría al máximo casa.” Ella agregó que ella “quisiera ver que Karl Rove se considerara responsable de su indiferencia completa de la ley.” En una letra enviada al abogado del Rove una semana hace, un Conyers y un Sanchez amenazado eso “una denegación a aparecer en la violación de la citación podía sujetar a Sr. Vague a los procedimientos del desprecio, incluyendo desprecio estatutario bajo ley federal y procedimientos bajo autoridad inherente del desprecio de la cámara de representantes.” “Hay una cárcel en el Capitol de los E.E.U.U.,” Shuster precisado, “que no se ha utilizado por una cierta hora, pero usted está diciendo, y el comité, algo de sus colegas está diciendo esta noche, usted desea Karl Rove en esa cárcel si él continúa rechazando las demandas de este comité. Es eso qué usted está diciendo?” Sanchez observó eso “con algunas de las renovaciones que han entrado encendido en el Capitol sobre los años, allí realmente no es una cárcel física real allí,” solamente ella insistió que el “cualquiera que los scoffs en la ley y ha confiado una ofensa que es castigable por tiempo de la cárcel se debe poner en cárcel.” Ella cree que hay “una probabilidad muy grande” que la casa llena votará para sostener el Rove en desprecio. Shuster entonces pidió el professer legal Jonatán Turley, “es los demócratas realmente serios, tomando esto hasta el final?” “Pienso que Juan Conyers podría muy bien ser serio,” Turley contestado. “La invocación del privilegio ejecutivo por el Rove en esta materia realmente es ridícula.” “I think the White House knows once again that it has overextended an executive privilege claim and that it would not be sustained in a court of law,” Turley continued. “No court has ever said what the White House seems to be suggesting. … It would be untenable. We would never be able to have any check on the White House.” Turley believes that the White House is simply “trying to run the clock out.” When asked if Congress would go as far as trying to jail Rove, he answered, “I don’t think we’re going to get to that,” but he felt there is a real possibility of a vote for inherent contempt. “Congress gave up the authority of inherent contempt under an agreement with the Justice Department that it would be an honest broker, that it would take these cases to the grand jury,” Turley explained. “What Attorney Mukasey is doing right now I think is far beyond bounds. He is refusing to let a grand jury see these cases. … So I think at this point that Congress has a right to say, ‘Deal’s off.’” Shuster then turned to two other guests for comment. Former Bush aide Brad Blakeman insisted that Rove is just following legal advice in refusing to testify and “the president’s privilege trumps what Congress wants to do.” He suggested that when there’s a conflict between the executive and the legislative branches, “the remedy is to go to the courts.” The Huffington Post’s Roy Sekoff replied that “Rove is thumbing his nose at the Constitution. … They think that they are above the law. … The Justice Department is refusing to take it to the grand jury.” However, Sekoff doubts that the House will actually try to put Rove in jail. “Nothing will happen,” he stated pessimistically. “They’ll refer it to the Justice Department … and the clock will run out.” “It’s a tremendous abuse of their power,” Blakeman argued. “They know that, and it’s exactly why they’re not going to execute on the contempt. They’re not going to lock Karl Rove up. … They want Karl Rove as a political pawn before a major election to embarrass the president.” “In United States vs. Nixon, they found that executive privilege is not absolute,” Sekoff retorted. “It applies to military and diplomatic situations, not to a thing where Karl Rove is trying to build a permanent majority with political trickery.” This video is from MSNBC’s Verdict, broadcast July 10, 2008. http://216.87.173.33/media/2008/0807/msnbc_verdict_sanchez_rove_contempt_080710a.flv See More:USA NewsDiscuss this report in the RINF forums > Have Your Say: They’re not going to lock up Rove, Former Bush aide insists One Response to “They’re not going to lock up Rove, Former Bush aide insists”
|
Translations             
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
They’re Not Going to Lock Up Rove, Former Bush Aide Insists…
“The next step would be for the full committee to take up the contempt recommendation,” Sanchez stated, “which I’ve been told by Chairman Conyers that he’s anxious to do, and from there it would go to the full House.” She added that she “would like to …