|
|
Translate:
              The CIA’s open secrets
Monday, August 27th, 2007 When a federal judge dismissed Valerie Plame’s lawsuit against the Central Intelligence Agency earlier this month, she ruled that the agency was entitled to stop Plame from publishing the dates of her agency service, even though these dates had been supplied to Congress in an unclassified letter from the CIA and had been published in The Congressional Record. Plame is just one in a long line of ex-CIA employees to lose similar suits, in which the agency successfully defended the position that information in the public domain was classified. How can information that’s a five-minute Google search away be classified? It’s simple. Classified information is not the same thing as secret information. When I worked in the CIA’s directorate of operations (now called the national clandestine service) in the early ’90s, we were told that information was classified when it involved sources or methods. It seemed logical that sources were classified. These were actual agents who would be put in jeopardy if their identities were revealed. But practically everything the CIA does could be considered a “method,” so the CIA can decide that almost anything relating to its work is classified. You’d probably want this latitude if you were running an intelligence agency. But one of its unfortunate byproducts is that no one, inside or outside the intelligence community, really knows what classified information is. Because so many things at the CIA are classified, only a small percentage of them are actually secrets. Take agency cover arrangements. I cannot write about them in this article in any detail. If I point out that agency officers are often under cover as XXXXXXXXXX, the CIA will make me take it out before publishing this article. (Before I submitted this article to the CIA’s publications review board, I blacked it out myself to save the reviewers the trouble.) But are cover arrangements secret? Most of the time, no. Anyone with even a passing interest in espionage knows about the CIA’s use of the specific cover that I redacted above. If you think you know what’s under that black bar, you’re probably right. Certainly every foreign intelligence agency in the world knows about it. It can’t possibly be considered secret. But it is definitely classified. What about the CIA’s covert action in Afghanistan in the 1980s? Everyone knew about this at the time - in no way, shape or form was it a secret - but it was a covert action, and it was classified. I’m assuming it has since been declassified because I’ve read all about it in books by ex-agency officers that were vetted by the agency. If I’m wrong, there will be some more redactions in this paragraph. There are actually legitimate reasons to classify so much information that isn’t secret. Even if every foreign government in the world knows about our cover arrangements, countless diplomatic and legal problems would be created if we officially admitted that we use them. Official acknowledgment of covert actions would be even riskier. It was problematic enough to be arming rebels in Afghanistan who were killing Soviet soldiers. How would the Soviets have responded if we had openly admitted it? How would we respond today if Iran openly admitted training and arming insurgents in Iraq? We may know their denials are false, but they help Iran avoid international sanction, and they help us avoid being forced to respond militarily. If the government openly admitted various CIA activities, even those that are already well-known, it could also precipitate a great deal of negative news coverage in the foreign press. (It would create yet another public perception problem to admit we classify information because of public perception, which is one of the reasons the fiction is maintained that information is classified because it is secret.) In the end, then, the classification system serves a perfectly valid purpose. It draws a distinction between the information that the government does, and does not, want to discuss publicly. What ends up classified may seem a bit perverse at times, such as when information in the public domain is ruled off limits for publication. But that’s troubling only if you make the mistake of thinking that classified information is supposed to be secret. For former CIA employees turned writers, like Plame, the vagaries of the system have tremendous advantages. Plame just wrote a book that the CIA could reasonably maintain was entirely classified. After all, you’re not supposed to quit an intelligence agency and then tell everybody about what you did when you were there (certainly a lot of methods would be involved). But since nobody is really sure what is and isn’t classified, the agency permits publication of a lot of material that could go either way. It seems petulant to sue over a few dates the CIA wanted to take out of a book that it was otherwise allowing to go forward. Plame was right that the dates weren’t secret. But the agency didn’t want to officially admit them, so they were, in fact, classified. Joseph Weisberg is the author of the forthcoming novel “An Ordinary Spy.” Have Your Say: The CIA’s open secrets Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
The Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Last post by ZingPao @ 02:43 AM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Drugs....again Last post by ZingPao @ 02:02 AM Austrian far right leader killed in car crash Last post by Nostalgia @ 02:01 AM LSD Cured My Headache Last post by ZingPao @ 01:40 AM Under Bush, Us Influence In Latin America Wanes Last post by ZingPao @ 01:33 AM Daily doses of ancient Chinese herb 'protects the brain if you have a stroke' Last post by TMI @ 01:01 AM Imf - Financial Meltdown Last post by ZingPao @ 12:59 AM Palin Guilty Liar Last post by ZingPao @ 12:55 AM U.S. Allegedly Listened In on Calls of Americans Abroad Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:40 AM amero? Last post by ZingPao @ 12:09 AM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive |
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
|
Spooks in the classroom Bush To Provide $6.4 Billion In Arms To Taiwan Govt. Uses Contractors to Probe Iraq Contractors The establishment that destroyed America's first republic Seven Years After 9/11, Spies Finally Forced to Share |
ZingPao commented on: Bush To Provide $6.4 Billion In Arms To Taiwan Well with $700 billion what the hell. Plenty to spread around right? May Bush, all of them,... Continue Reading & Reply Mad Boffin commented on: Buy Your Poison - Aspartame, Diet Soda, Splenda If you brush your teeth with Sodium Fluoride, do you suppose it all is spat out? So, If... Continue Reading & Reply Mick Meaney commented on: Spooks in the classroom I’ve removed your misinformation spam links. Please keep things on topic. Cheers. Continue Reading & Reply mark smith commented on: The EU’s control structure, inside and outside Britain Its all connected to the bilderberg and new world order Continue Reading & Reply |
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
