Прогрессивно
Activism средств
Нагрузка…
| Регистр | Lost пароль? | Информационый бюллетень
Пароль будет переслан к вам. Logon | Lost пароль?
Email будет послан к вам. Logon | Регистр
Переведите:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Инструменты: Новости | Комментарий столба | Вариант принтера | Email к другу

Среда 31-ое июль 2007

Втихомолку компенсации компании снадобья к докторам остают законными в 48 положениях

Делите эту статью:

Эти иконы соединяют к социальным bookmarking местам где читатели могут делить и открывать новые страницы стержня.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Дэвид Gutierrez

Только 5 положений и заречье Columbia требуют что подарки отчете о фармацевтических компаний, котор они делают к докторам, и выравниваются в этих подсудностях законы настолько плох принуждены которых детали этих трудыов остают de facto секретом, согласно изучению опубликованному в Журнал американской медицинской ассоциации.

Researchers examined public records from Vermont and Minnesota, the only two states that require disclosure by pharmaceutical companies and make that data available to the public. By studying the data from 2002 to 2004, the researchers hoped to gain a better understanding of how money moves from the pharmaceutical to the medical industry.

“What we really found was laws aren’t working,” said study author Joseph Ross, of the geriatrics department of Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York.

The researchers found that while reported payments were quite high, the details of those transactions were not available. In other cases, reported payments were so low as to be suspicious. For example, GlaxoSmithKline claimed zero dollars spent in Vermont in the time period studied, yet the state attorney general listed the company as making more payments than any other. In Minnesota, Amgen recorded zero dollars in payments in 2002 or 2004, but more than $4 million in 2003.

Part of the reason for this inconsistency is that gifts of drugs or items not yet on the market can be classified as “trade secrets” and not reported. But Ross believes that this loophole is being exploited.

“To designate every payment made as a trade secret … seems improbable,” he said.

Pharmaceutical companies have been known to give doctors extravagant gifts including all-expense-paid vacations or gourmet dinners as part of their marketing campaigns. According to Dr. Harlan Krumholz, an associate professor at the Yale University School of Medicine, this presents a conflict of interest that the public should know about.

Ross agrees. “If both parties think this payment is appropriate, then this information should be made available to the public,” he said.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Secret drug company payments to doctors remain legal in 48 states' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Pharma spends more on marketing than development
  • BAE ‘paid Saudi prince £1bn in secret’
  • US Justice Department to probe BAE Saudi deals
  • Drugs giant faces criminal charges over clinical trial
  • Mobiles to become digital wallets

  • This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 31st, 2007 at 9:45 pm and is filed under Breaking . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 623 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion

    Breaking News