17 Responses to “New - RINF Alternative Newsletter” 17個答复， “新-r inf替代時事通訊”

1. Mark 馬克 Posted: Jan 28th, 2008 at 12:56 pm | 發布時間： 2008年1月28日在下午12時56分| Link to this 鏈接到本

   Looking forward to this.期待著這一點。 Will I be emailed each time RINF is updated?我會通過電子郵件發送的每一次rinf更新？ Reply回复

2. Phil 菲爾 Posted: Jan 28th, 2008 at 3:05 pm | 發布時間： 2008年1月28日在下午3時05分| Link to this 鏈接到本

   Thanks for the newsletter and the comments options, I’ma regular reader and this will make the site even better.感謝通訊和評論選項，我是經常讀者和這將使該網站，甚至更好。 Keep up the good work!保持了良好的工作！ Reply回复

3. Mick Meaney 米克meaney Posted: Jan 28th, 2008 at 8:17 pm | 發布時間： 2008年1月28日在下午8時17分| Link to this 鏈接到本

   Thanks guys.感謝傢伙。 Mark , no you will not be emailed each time the site is updated.. 馬克 ，沒有你不會通過電子郵件發送的每一次網站更新.. I don’t want to flood your inboxes.我不想防洪您的收件箱。 You will be sent 1 email per every 20 headlines.您將發送1封電子郵件，每20頭條新聞。 Reply回复

4. COMSEUR comseur Posted: Jan 29th, 2008 at 8:03 am | 發布時間： 2008年1月29日在上午8時03分| Link to this 鏈接到本

   Good idea!好主意！ Thanks!謝謝！ Reply回复

5. Dave Buckley 戴夫巴克利 Posted: Jan 29th, 2008 at 1:31 pm | 發布時間： 2008年1月29日在下午1時31分| Link to this 鏈接到本

   Great site大遺址 Reply回复

6. cindi cindi Posted: Jan 29th, 2008 at 10:55 pm | 發布時間： 2008年1月29日在下午10時55分| Link to this 鏈接到本

   So good to see your return to my inbox, Mick!!那麼好，看看您的回報我的收件箱，米克！ Reply回复

7. John George 約翰喬治 Posted: Jan 30th, 2008 at 12:29 am | 發布時間： 2008年1月30日在上午12時29分| Link to this 鏈接到本

   We have nothing to fear but fear itself!我們沒有任何恐懼，但恐懼本身！ Reply回复

8. michael quilligan 邁克爾quilligan Posted: Jan 30th, 2008 at 8:19 am | 發布時間： 2008年1月30日在上午8時19分| Link to this 鏈接到本

   Good to have you back, Mick好，你們有回，米克 your work is appreciated,你的工作表示讚賞， Beir bua, BEIR - bua ， misterq Reply回复

9. Mick Meaney 米克meaney Posted: Jan 30th, 2008 at 11:09 am | 發布時間： 2008年1月30日在上午11時09分| Link to this 鏈接到本

   Really glad you guys are into this, the amount of people joining the mailing list is a lot more than I expected.真的很高興你們都到這一點，數額人加入郵寄名單是一個有很多比我更預期。 I’m also planning to bring back the news feeder which displays (and links to) the latest headlines from sites I like.我也打算帶回的消息，饋線，其中顯示器（和鏈接）最新的頭條從網站上我喜歡。 It was popular about a year ago, so any suggestions are welcome.這是受歡迎的大約一年前，因此，任何建議都表示歡迎。 Reply回复

10. insider 內幕 Posted: Jan 30th, 2008 at 8:50 pm | 發布時間： 2008年1月30日在下午8時50分| Link to this 鏈接到本

    Makes me wish I had a webcam.令我想我有一個攝像頭。 On second thought, it’s better for you lot that I don’t.關於第二個思想，它的更好的為您很多，我不。 Reply回复

11. cush cush Posted: Feb 1st, 2008 at 12:17 am | 發布時間： 2008年2月1日在上午12時17分| Link to this 鏈接到本

    As usual Mick, excellent access and content.一如以往米克，優良的獲取和內容。 Reply回复

12. Readfer readfer Posted: Feb 1st, 2008 at 8:37 pm | 發布時間： 2008年2月1日在下午8時37分| Link to this 鏈接到本

    This is really cool… What’s more important Great job!這是真的很酷… …什麼的更重要的偉大的工作！ Reply回复

13. Joe Soter 喬蘇特 Posted: Mar 3rd, 2008 at 7:23 pm | 發布時間： 2008年3月3日在下午7點23分| Link to this 鏈接到本

    A few of us have started archiving the newsletter here數，我們已經開始封存通訊在這裡 http://rinfnewsletter.wordpress.com I hope RINF doesn’t mind.我希望rinf不介意。 Reply回复

14. Darkangel88 darkangel88 Posted: Mar 10th, 2008 at 9:02 pm | 發布時間： 2008年3月10日在下午9點02分| Link to this 鏈接到本

    This comment relates to the new newsletter called “9/11 and Iraq-The Concealed Connection!” I agree that the blogger is well informed and has made a very convincing argument about a connection between 9/11 and Iraq, but I will have to disagree with their main assumption.此評論涉及到新的時事通訊所謂的“ 9 / 11和伊拉克-隱蔽連接！ ： ”我同意這Blogger是充分知情，並已提出了一個非常令人信服的論據約之間的連接9 / 11和伊拉克，但我會要不同意他們的主要假設。 Their assumption that “Iraq was in no way responsible for what happened on 9/11, but 9/11 was in every way responsible for what happened in Iraq” is a contradiction in itself.他們的假設是“伊拉克是在沒有辦法負責對所發生的9 / 11 ，但9 / 11是在每一個負責的方式所發生的事情在伊拉克”是一個矛盾的本身。 Stating that the war in Iraq is not responsible for 9/11 contradicts the next phrase in the same sentence stating that 9/11 is completely responsible for the Iraq War.聲明指出，伊拉克戰爭是不負責9 / 11矛盾明年詞組在同一句中，說明9 / 11 ，完全是負責為伊拉克戰爭。 The blogger basically states that there is no link between the two and then goes back on what they just said. Blogger的國家基本上不存在兩者之間的聯繫，然後可以追溯到上什麼他們只是說。 With this dilemma I believe there is no link.與這個兩難的我相信這是沒有任何聯繫。 The blogger presents a good argument but I think needs to distinguish their assumption a little better. Blogger的介紹了一個很好的論據，但我認為，需要區分他們的假設一點更好。 Reply回复

15. carl 卡爾。 Posted: Apr 23rd, 2008 at 11:46 am | 發布時間： 2008年4月23日在上午11時46分| Link to this 鏈接到本

    I think that as ‘we’ were in IRAQ a few years after the 9/11, is it not impossible to assume that the same thing will happen in a few years time (maybe sooner) with regards to IRAN ?我認為作為'我們'在伊拉克的數年之後， 9 / 11 ，這不是不可能的假設同樣的事情會發生在幾年的時間（可能是遲早）關於伊朗？ With the almost daily reports of something being said to come out of IRAN - ‘fanning the flames of retaliation’, have we been blinkered into assuming that IRAN are wholly BAD, and the ALIIES are nothing but good, therefore ‘attacking’ - regime change, is our only ‘option’ ?與幾乎每天都報導的東西，被說出來的伊朗-'煽風點火報復' ，我們一直b linkered到假設伊朗是完全不好，和a liies只不過是好的，因此， '攻擊' -政權更替，是我們唯一的'選項'嗎？ How long will it be before ‘bomb attack’ on british soil, is ‘engineered’ by IRAN ?多久才會之前， '炸彈攻擊'就英國屬土，是'工程' ，由伊朗？ And then our only option will be attack IRAN, with our friends across the water pulling the strings ?然後我們唯一的選擇，將攻打伊朗，與我們的朋友全國水拉弦樂？ I hope this will not happen, but as we do not learn from histry, we are destined to repeat our mistakes, wether we wake up and smell the coffe, or not.我希望這不會發生，但由於我們不學習histry ，我們注定要重複我們的錯誤，天氣我們醒來時，並聞到咖啡壺，或者沒有。 Reply回复

16. Paul Clark 保羅克拉克 Posted: Apr 27th, 2008 at 11:55 am | 發布時間： 2008年4月27日上午11時55分| Link to this 鏈接到本

    FIGHTING BACK HOME?爭取回家鄉？ I live on the lovely island of guernsey,that is the island sistered with Jersey, and on the Liberation day all the local people will be getting drunk and eating-more ,and enjoying the festivities.我住在可愛島格恩西島，這是sistered島與澤西島，以及對解放日的所有當地居民將會得到喝醉酒和吃更多的，享受節日。 all well and good..BUT…………….以及所有和良好的..但… … … … … 。 The swear word on the island is COLLABARATION,the islanders are cowards and have a yellow streek running down there spine.the women had many children after the islands were re-claimed.the falklands islanders showed more sprit and resolve then guernsey people.All the large family/business on the island have a dodgy begining-finace industry is the no 1 employer….enough said.HURTS LIKE HELL THAT UK WAS GETTING THE ….OUT OF IT AND THE GUERNS WERE DOING DEALS FOR A EASY LIFE..該宣誓詞上島是collabaration ，島民是懦夫和一個黃色的streek運行下來有spine.the婦女有許多兒童後，離島被重新claimed.the福克蘭群島的島民表明，更多的精神和決心，然後格恩西島people.all該大型家庭/企業在該島上有一個dodgy begining - finace業是沒有一雇主… 。足夠的said.hurts像地獄，英國是得到… … 。出來，它和guerns做交易為安逸.. Paul…鄭明訓… Reply回复

17. Paul Clark 保羅克拉克 Posted: Apr 27th, 2008 at 12:20 pm | 發布時間： 2008年4月27日在下午12時20分| Link to this 鏈接到本

    BLACK OPPERATIONS.黑色opperations 。 FIGHING THE GOOD FIGHT- fighing良好撲滅 Why cant we use torture methods to extract intel/information that would result in long term saving of lives.If i or any of my mob had been captured then i have no wish to describe the treatment that would be handed out.I understand human rights and the relevant issues BUT if you come into the the uk hell bent on causing harm to her or her people then a clear and present threat has to be available to strike back..I would for one welcome extra force to deal with ……Paul為什麼cannot我們使用酷刑的方法提取英特爾/資料，將導致在長期節省lives.if我或我的任何暴徒已被抓獲，然後我不打算來形容的待遇，將移交out.i理解人權及相關問題，但如果你到英國的地獄一意孤行，造成傷害她或她的人，然後一個明確的和當前的威脅已以供反擊..我會為一歡迎額外的力量來處理… …保羅 Reply回复