22 reacties op „Alternatief Bulletin RINF“

1. Teken Gepost: 28 januari, 2008 in 12:56 p.m.

   Het verheugen zich op dit. Zal ik met de elektronische post verstuurd worden telkens als RINF wordt bijgewerkt? Antwoord | Citaat geselecteerde tekst | Verbinding met dit

2. Phil Gepost: 28 januari, 2008 in 3:05 p.m.

   Dank voor het bulletin en de commentarenopties, ben ik een regelmatige lezer en dit zal de plaats nog beter maken. Houd omhoog het goede werk! Antwoord | Citaat geselecteerde tekst | Verbinding met dit

3. Mick Meaney Gepost: 28 januari, 2008 in 8:17 p.m.

   De kerels van dank. Teken, geen zult u niet met de elektronische post verstuurd worden telkens als de plaats. wordt bijgewerkt. Ik wil niet uw inboxes overstromen. U zal 1 e-mail per elke 20 krantekoppen worden verzonden. Antwoord | Citaat geselecteerde tekst | Verbinding met dit

4. COMSEUR Gepost: 29 januari, 2008 in 8:03 am

   Goed idee! Dank! Antwoord | Citaat geselecteerde tekst | Verbinding met dit

5. Dave Buckley Gepost: 29 januari, 2008 in 1:31 p.m.

   Grote plaats Antwoord | Citaat geselecteerde tekst | Verbinding met dit

6. cindi Gepost: 29 januari, 2008 in 10:55 p.m.

   Zo goed om uw terugkeer aan mijn inbox, Mick te zien!! Antwoord | Citaat geselecteerde tekst | Verbinding met dit

7. John George Gepost: 30 januari, 2008 in 12:29 am

   Wij hebben te vrezen niets maar vrezen ons! Antwoord | Quote selected text | Link to this

8. michael quilligan Posted: Jan 30th, 2008 at 8:19 am

   Good to have you back, Mick your work is appreciated, Beir bua, misterq Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

9. Mick Meaney Posted: Jan 30th, 2008 at 11:09 am

   Really glad you guys are into this, the amount of people joining the mailing list is a lot more than I expected. I’m also planning to bring back the news feeder which displays (and links to) the latest headlines from sites I like. It was popular about a year ago, so any suggestions are welcome. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

10. insider Posted: Jan 30th, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    Makes me wish I had a webcam. On second thought, it’s better for you lot that I don’t. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

11. cush Posted: Feb 1st, 2008 at 12:17 am

    As usual Mick, excellent access and content. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

12. Readfer Posted: Feb 1st, 2008 at 8:37 pm

    This is really cool… What’s more important Great job! Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

13. Joe Soter Posted: Mar 3rd, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    A few of us have started archiving the newsletter here http://rinfnewsletter.wordpress.com I hope RINF doesn’t mind. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

14. Darkangel88 Posted: Mar 10th, 2008 at 9:02 pm

    This comment relates to the new newsletter called “9/11 and Iraq-The Concealed Connection!” I agree that the blogger is well informed and has made a very convincing argument about a connection between 9/11 and Iraq, but I will have to disagree with their main assumption. Their assumption that “Iraq was in no way responsible for what happened on 9/11, but 9/11 was in every way responsible for what happened in Iraq” is a contradiction in itself. Stating that the war in Iraq is not responsible for 9/11 contradicts the next phrase in the same sentence stating that 9/11 is completely responsible for the Iraq War. The blogger basically states that there is no link between the two and then goes back on what they just said. With this dilemma I believe there is no link. The blogger presents a good argument but I think needs to distinguish their assumption a little better. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

15. carl Posted: Apr 23rd, 2008 at 11:46 am

    I think that as ‘we’ were in IRAQ a few years after the 9/11, is it not impossible to assume that the same thing will happen in a few years time (maybe sooner) with regards to IRAN ? With the almost daily reports of something being said to come out of IRAN - ‘fanning the flames of retaliation’, have we been blinkered into assuming that IRAN are wholly BAD, and the ALIIES are nothing but good, therefore ‘attacking’ - regime change, is our only ‘option’ ? How long will it be before ‘bomb attack’ on british soil, is ‘engineered’ by IRAN ? And then our only option will be attack IRAN, with our friends across the water pulling the strings ? I hope this will not happen, but as we do not learn from histry, we are destined to repeat our mistakes, wether we wake up and smell the coffe, or not. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

16. Paul Clark Posted: Apr 27th, 2008 at 11:55 am

    FIGHTING BACK HOME? I live on the lovely island of guernsey,that is the island sistered with Jersey, and on the Liberation day all the local people will be getting drunk and eating-more ,and enjoying the festivities. all well and good..BUT……………. The swear word on the island is COLLABARATION,the islanders are cowards and have a yellow streek running down there spine.the women had many children after the islands were re-claimed.the falklands islanders showed more sprit and resolve then guernsey people.All the large family/business on the island have a dodgy begining-finace industry is the no 1 employer….enough said.HURTS LIKE HELL THAT UK WAS GETTING THE ….OUT OF IT AND THE GUERNS WERE DOING DEALS FOR A EASY LIFE.. Paul… Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

17. Paul Clark Posted: Apr 27th, 2008 at 12:20 pm

    BLACK OPPERATIONS. FIGHING THE GOOD FIGHT- Why cant we use torture methods to extract intel/information that would result in long term saving of lives.If i or any of my mob had been captured then i have no wish to describe the treatment that would be handed out.I understand human rights and the relevant issues BUT if you come into the the u.k. hell bent on causing harm to her or her people then a clear and present threat has to be available to strike back..I would for one welcome extra force to deal with ……Paul Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

18. Paul Clark Posted: Jun 15th, 2008 at 8:16 am

    would be most gratfull for any feed back/response/comments Paul c. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

19. Paul Clark Posted: Jun 22nd, 2008 at 8:30 am

    please watch END GAME,] pAUL Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

20. Phil Sebree Posted: Sep 11th, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    I would like to get personalized news for my website Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

21. Mick Meaney Posted: Sep 11th, 2008 at 9:27 pm

    OK Phil, I’m actually working on something new but we have a few options.. you can have a news ticker like the one at the top of this page or you can have a basic list of the latest headlines. If there’s a section of RINF news you want to display (for example just UK news) we can also do that. Drop me a line through the forum, just search for Mick. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

22. The Truth Be Told Posted: Sep 21st, 2008 at 8:02 pm

    Born agains are freaks plain and simple. They have been brainwashed to the point they will lie, cheat, and sneak to get what they want in business, with friends and family, and slaughter you with THEIR view of the Bible. They prey on the under educated (Africa is a favorite target), jail birds (meetings with those in jail), naive teens in their development stages of making informed judgments, and anyone else who is an easy target. They are as dangerous to a society as Hitler’s Gestapo was in Europe. When you run into one, don’t be nice since that is one of their sneaky tactics and run as far way from them as you can. If you are in a store or in line to purchase something, drop it and tell the manager on your way out you don’t want to shop there because of Born Again freaks solicitation on their premise. The born again club/society has gone far enough. Since they are brainwashed to the danger point, it is hard to stop them. Any engagement with them is usually fruitless because they are so clever and manipulative. You can not trust them in any way, form shape, or matter. Period. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this