最新新闻 | 论坛 | 英国新闻 | 美国新闻 | 国际新闻 | 政治报纸 | Sci技术新闻 | 战争&恐怖主义新闻 | 体育新闻 | 多媒体 | 设置主页

星期五， 2007年8月31日

I.P.O. 信息服务
flamesong

在2007年8月4日博士。 Hans从先生接受的Koechler。 Edwin Bollier，基于瑞士的公司MEBO AG，先生，约会2007年7月18日和签字的宣誓书的德国原物的拷贝的头。 Ulrich Lumpert，前雇员(电子工程师) AG，苏黎世MEBO，与Lockerbie事例有关。

在声明今天发布了，博士。 Hans Koechler，在荷兰跟随了Lockerbie行动从试验起点在2000年5月，被突出的基本的这新的揭示方面和问题看来是相关性不仅与被判罪的利比亚国民的即将来临的第二呼吁相关，而且为新的上诉行动根据职权由苏格兰当局。

在他的宣誓书先生。 Lumpert含蓄地承认犯伪证罪当证人没有。 550在苏格兰法院面前在荷兰。 他陈述(Par。 2) 他在1989年6月22日在苏黎世窃取了一个“MST-13定时器个人计算机板的”一个手工制造(由他)样品从MEBO公司并且递了它， (!)对调查Lockerbie情况的“正式人”。 进一步他状态(在Par。 5) MST-13定时器的片段，法庭上被提出作为证据的重要部分的裁减成二个片断为“假想法庭原因”， 1989年源于他窃取了和移交对一位调查员的片断。 他进一步阐明，当他发觉了这个片断为“故意政治上被刺激的罪犯使用了承担” (vorsätzliche politisch kriminelle “Machenschaft”)他决定，出于恐惧为他的生活，保持沈默在问题上。

先生相当晚入场。 Lumpert与更早的揭示是一致的在一名前苏格兰警察(身分未被透露对公众)陈述“的英国和苏格兰媒介CIA种植了电路板的微小的片段关键在判罪利比亚人”为泛美航空喷气机(苏格兰的轰炸在星期天， 2005 8月28日)。

收到本文后，博士。 Koechler在2007年的8月7日通知了所有者AG MEBO先生。 Lumpert will have to submit his affidavit under oath before the competent judicial authorities of Scotland. In the meantime (22 August 2007), the owner of MEBO AG has requested the Scottish judicial authorities – by way of the Swiss Prosecutor’s office and on the basis of the agreement on mutual judicial assistance between the UK and Switzerland – to investigate the alleged criminal manipulations referred to in Mr. Lumpert’s statement.

In his capacity as UN-appointed observer of the Lockerbie trial, Dr. Hans Koechler has repeatedly raised the issue of the timer fragment and expressed his amazement at the Defense team’s refusal to look into the matter during Mr. Megrahi’s appeal when questions as to the reliability of forensic evidence had already been raised. (See Dr. Koechler’s appeal report, Par. 10 [c] of 26 March 2002; his statement of 23 August 2003, Par. 10; and his statement of 14 October 2005, Par. 2.)

It is to be recalled that, as witness before the Lockerbie court, Mr. Edwin Bollier had raised the issue of the manipulation of the timer fragments, but was brusquely interrupted in his testimony by the presiding Judge and prevented from giving further information in this matter.

In the meantime (information received on 26 August 2007), Mr. Lumpert has revised part of his Affidavit (Par. 5); he now states that the letter “M” on the timer fragment (supposedly for the German word Muster: sample), unlike previously stated, has been engraved by himself. In view of this and earlier statements, Mr. Lumpert’s credibility will have to be assessed very carefully by the competent judicial authorities and he will have to be made aware of the consequences, in terms of criminal law, of lying to the Court.

At the same time, the credibility of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) is also at stake. In its News Release of 28 June 2007, in which it had announced the referral of Mr. Al-Megrahi’s case to the Scottish High Court for a second appeal, the SCCRC found it necessary to “absolve” the investigating authorities of any suspicion of wrongdoing. Should Mr. Lumpert’s confession be proven to be true, the SCCRC’s statement – “The Commission undertook extensive enquiries in this area but found nothing to support that allegation or to undermine the trial court’s conclusions in respect of the fragment” – will appear highly questionable, even dubious. The public will have to ask why a supposedly independent judicial review body would try to exonerate “preventively” officials in a case which is being returned to the High Court for a second appeal because of suspicions of a miscarriage of justice.

If it is indeed the rule of law that governs the Scottish polity, the Scottish judicial authorities will have to deal with this new revelation ex officio – independently of how the appeal court in Mr. Megrahi’s case will evaluate this witness’s confession of perjury.

Those responsible for the midair explosion of PanAm flight 103 will have to be identified and brought to justice. If there was any wrongdoing, criminal and/or due to incompetence, of the judicial authorities in the investigation and prosecution of the Lockerbie case, this will also have to be dealt with through proper procedures of criminal law. A continuation of the rather obvious cover-up which we have witnessed up until now is neither acceptable for the citizens of Scotland nor for the international public, Dr. Koechler stated.

See More:CIA Cover Up False Flag FBI History Military Terrorism UK News USA News Warfare 

Have Your Say: Lockerbie case: new accusations of manipulation of key forensic evidence
Please note, only selected comments will be published.

Or discuss this report in our our new forums

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

This entry was posted on Friday, August 31st, 2007 at 7:01 pm and is filed under Breaking News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Afghanistan Alternative Energy Art BBC Big Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CIA Climate Change Cover Up Cults Culture Database State David Hicks David Ray Griffin Democrats Demos Drugs Education EU False Flag FBI Fraud Free Speech Freemasons G8 Globalization Guantanamo Health News History ID Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel Law Marches MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police State Propaganda RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Secrecy Security Space Sports Spying Stephen Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony Blair Torture TV UK News UN USA News Video Voting Warfare White House Wolfowitz World News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version