FAA warns Colorado town that shooting down drones could lead to prosecution

On the heels of a Colorado town’s announcement that it was floating the idea of legalized drone hunting, the Federal Aviation Administration has warned that the practice could result in prosecution and fines.

The small town of Deer Trail, Colorado is currently weighing an
ordinance that would grant residents permits to shoot down
unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, and even encourage the
practice by awarding a $100 bounty to anyone presenting
identifiable pieces of a drone that has been shot out of the sky.

Deer Trail resident Phillip Steel, who introduced the ordinance
for debate – while admitting the move would be largely symbolic –
voiced distrust towards the quickly proliferating technology
already shared by many others, in particular privacy advocates
who recoil at the thought of flying cameras hovering over
American communities.

“Basically, I do not believe in
the idea of a surveillance society, and I believe we are heading
that way,”
says Steel.

“We do not want drones in town.
They fly in town, they get shot down,”
he added.

In response, the FAA has released a statement that seeks to
answer many of the questions raised by such a city ordinance,
whether symbolic or otherwise.

A drone “hit by gunfire could
crash, causing damage to persons or property on the ground, or it
could collide with other objects in the air,”
the
statement said.

“Shooting at an unmanned
aircraft could result in criminal or civil liability, just as
would firing at a manned airplane,”
adds the FAA.

Steel said in an interview that he already has 28 signatures on
his petition – roughly 10 per cent of the town’s registered
voters. Colorado law requires local officials to formally
consider the proposal at a meeting in August, reports the AP.

Town officials would then have the option of adopting the
ordinance or putting it on the ballot in an election this fall,
he said.

Steel has already dismissed the FAA’s warning, saying that
“the FAA doesn’t have the power
to make a law.”

The FAA does have regulatory authority over all civil aviation,
and Congress has given the agency until 2015 to develop
additional regulations governing the use of drones over US
territory. The FAA already estimates that thousands of drones
will be in use over the country for a range of purposes,
including search and rescue operations and agriculture
activities.

Kim Oldfield, the Deer Trail town clerk, told 7News that the
so-called drone hunt is not likely to take the form of local
vigilantism.

“I can see it as a benefit,
monetarily speaking, because of the novelty of the
ordinance,”
says Oldfield.

“Possibly hunting drones in a
skeet, fun-filled festival. We’re the home of the world’s first
rodeo, so we could home of the world’s first drone hunt. If they
were to read it for the title alone and not for the novelty and
what it really is, it sounds scary, and it sounds super vigilante
and frightening,”
adds Oldfield.

Though Deer Trail’s potential ordinance has made headlines for
its unique take on drones, other communities and states have also
begun to take steps to regulate drone use, in particular for the
purposes of domestic surveillance.

According to the ACLU, legislation that would regulate drone use
has been proposed in 42 states and enacted in six, and is still
being floated in some 27. In some states including Georgia,
Illinois, Montana, Oklahoma and Massachusetts, proposed
legislation would ban the weaponization of drones.

Other states such as Hawaii, Maine and Washington, in response to
interest by police departments to use drones to help in their
investigations would require reporting from law enforcement
agencies on their drone usage. California and a handful of other
states want law enforcement to justify the need for drones before
they are ever acquired.

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, in February 2012
81 county and city law enforcement agencies applied for
certificates of authorisation from the FAA to operate drones. The
EFF was alarmed that law enforcement had looked to acquire drones
without consulting their communities, and without specific
regulation on their use already in place.

Beyond local law enforcement, the Washington Post revealed this
June that the FBI had begun seeking permission from the FAA to
fly drones domestically in 2009, and received authorization for
its first operations a year later.

A Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the EFF led to some
disclosure by the FBI on a total of four drone operations, though
the FBI declined in June to say how many drones the agency had,
and only that it sought approval from the FAA in advance.

Republished with permission from: RT