Прогрессивно
Activism средств
Нагрузка…
| Регистр | Lost пароль? | Информационый бюллетень
Пароль будет переслан к вам. Logon | Lost пароль?
Email будет послан к вам. Logon | Регистр
Переведите:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Инструменты: Новости | Комментарий столба | Вариант принтера | Email к другу

Воскресенье 1-ое сентябрь 2007

Кустик идет назад на его слово

Делите эту статью:

Эти иконы соединяют к социальным bookmarking местам где читатели могут делить и открывать новые страницы стержня.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Пчела Sacramento

2 с половиной месяцев в его работу в 2001, президент Кустик адресовали американское общество редакторов газеты и посмотрели вопрос о открытом правительстве. Оно be worth recalling обмен:

Questioner: «Вы приняли бы этот момент для того чтобы артикулировать ваш собственный взгляд первых freedoms поправкы и дать нам чувство основного сообщения вы пошлете к вашей администрации по мере того как они решениея дальше принимают ли раскрыть или близкий доступ к данным по правительства?»

Кустик: “There needs to be balance when it comes to freedom of information laws. There are some things that when I discuss in the privacy of the Oval Office or national security matters that just should not be in the national arena.

“On the other hand, my administration will cooperate fully with a Freedom of Information request if it doesn’t jeopardize national security, for example. The interesting problem I have, or for me, as the president, is what’s personal and what’s not personal. And, you know, frankly, I haven’t been on the job long enough to have had to make those choices. … I used to be an avid e-mailer, and I e-mailed to my daughters or e-mailed to my father, for example, and I don’t want those e-mails to be in the public domain. …

But we’ll cooperate with the press, unless we think it’s a matter of national security or something that’s entirely private.”

Today, you’re no longer a rookie, Mr. President. You should be clear by now about what is a public e-mail and what is a family e-mail.

It is a matter of public concern that at least 5 million White House e-mails are missing. A watchdog group has sued for the White House Office of Administration to turn over information about the e-mails, some related to the firing of U.S. attorneys.

Last week, the Justice Department argued that the office is not subject to the open-records law. The office’s Web site, however, tells anyone how to use the law to request documents.

Bush has failed in his commitment to open government by losing sight of what is the public’s business. It is not - and has never been - a fatherly e-mail to his daughters.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Bush goes back on his word' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Appeals Court Rules for E-Mail Privacy
  • Bush Administration Has Double-Secret Private Communication System
  • Giuliani Secrecy
  • What are they hiding?
  • Spy chief pushes to expand surveillance powers

  • This entry was posted on Saturday, September 1st, 2007 at 5:45 pm and is filed under Breaking . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 460 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion - 737 Total Comments

    Breaking News