ローディング…
ブッシュは彼の単語で戻る
|
|
2001年に彼の仕事への2.5か月、ブッシュ大統領新聞編集者のアメリカの社会に演説し、開いた政府についての質問に直面した。 それは交換をリコールする価値がある:
質問者: 「この米国憲法修正第一項の自由のあなた自身の意見を連結し、私達に開くために決定かどうかか政府情報への近いアクセスをか」。するようにあなたがあなたの管理に送る基本的なメッセージの感覚を与えるために時を取る
ブッシュ: “There needs to be balance when it comes to freedom of information laws. There are some things that when I discuss in the privacy of the Oval Office or national security matters that just should not be in the national arena.
“On the other hand, my administration will cooperate fully with a Freedom of Information request if it doesn’t jeopardize national security, for example. The interesting problem I have, or for me, as the president, is what’s personal and what’s not personal. And, you know, frankly, I haven’t been on the job long enough to have had to make those choices. … I used to be an avid e-mailer, and I e-mailed to my daughters or e-mailed to my father, for example, and I don’t want those e-mails to be in the public domain. …
But we’ll cooperate with the press, unless we think it’s a matter of national security or something that’s entirely private.”
Today, you’re no longer a rookie, Mr. President. You should be clear by now about what is a public e-mail and what is a family e-mail.
It is a matter of public concern that at least 5 million White House e-mails are missing. A watchdog group has sued for the White House Office of Administration to turn over information about the e-mails, some related to the firing of U.S. attorneys.
Last week, the Justice Department argued that the office is not subject to the open-records law. The office’s Web site, however, tells anyone how to use the law to request documents.
Bush has failed in his commitment to open government by losing sight of what is the public’s business. It is not - and has never been - a fatherly e-mail to his daughters.
Bush Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'Bush goes back on his word' :
Related News:
