Progressiv
Mittel-Aktivismus
Laden…
| Register | Verlorenes Kennwort? | Rundschreiben
Ein Kennwort wird zu Ihnen verschickt. LOGON | Verlorenes Kennwort?
Ein email wird Ihnen geschickt. LOGON | Register
Übersetzen Sie:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Werkzeuge: Nachrichten | Pfosten-Anmerkung | Drucker-Version | Email zum Freund

Samstag, den 1. September 2007

Bush geht zurück auf sein Wort

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel:

Diese Ikonen verbinden mit bookmarkenden Sozialaufstellungsorten, in denen Leser neue Webseiten teilen und entdecken können.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Sacramento Biene

ZWEI und eine Hälfte Monate in seinen Job 2001, Präsident Bush sprachen zu der amerikanischen Gesellschaft der Zeitungsverleger und stellten eine Frage über geöffnete Regierung gegenüber. Es ist recalling den Austausch wert:

Frager: „Würden Sie diesen Moment dauern, um Ihre eigene Ansicht von erste änderung freedoms zu artikulieren und uns eine Richtung der grundlegenden Anzeige zu geben, die Sie Ihrer Leitung schicken, wie sie Entscheidungen an trifft, ob man öffnet oder nahen Zugang zu den Regierung Informationen?“

Bush: “There needs to be balance when it comes to freedom of information laws. There are some things that when I discuss in the privacy of the Oval Office or national security matters that just should not be in the national arena.

“On the other hand, my administration will cooperate fully with a Freedom of Information request if it doesn’t jeopardize national security, for example. The interesting problem I have, or for me, as the president, is what’s personal and what’s not personal. And, you know, frankly, I haven’t been on the job long enough to have had to make those choices. … I used to be an avid e-mailer, and I e-mailed to my daughters or e-mailed to my father, for example, and I don’t want those e-mails to be in the public domain. …

But we’ll cooperate with the press, unless we think it’s a matter of national security or something that’s entirely private.”

Today, you’re no longer a rookie, Mr. President. You should be clear by now about what is a public e-mail and what is a family e-mail.

It is a matter of public concern that at least 5 million White House e-mails are missing. A watchdog group has sued for the White House Office of Administration to turn over information about the e-mails, some related to the firing of U.S. attorneys.

Last week, the Justice Department argued that the office is not subject to the open-records law. The office’s Web site, however, tells anyone how to use the law to request documents.

Bush has failed in his commitment to open government by losing sight of what is the public’s business. It is not - and has never been - a fatherly e-mail to his daughters.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Bush goes back on his word' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Appeals Court Rules for E-Mail Privacy
  • Bush Administration Has Double-Secret Private Communication System
  • Giuliani Secrecy
  • What are they hiding?
  • Spy chief pushes to expand surveillance powers

  • This entry was posted on Saturday, September 1st, 2007 at 5:45 pm and is filed under Breaking . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 582 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion - 695 Total Comments

    Brand Obama can’t take competition, hires Starbucks lawyer to fight Hillary… « Valentine Bonnaire on Obama's Blackwater Problem

    Breaking News