Bush Allowed To Continue Violating Laws布什允許繼續違反法律
Conyers Staffer Says They Are Choosing to Let Bush Continue Violating Laws 康亞斯人員表示，他們正在選擇，讓布什繼續違反法律
By Donna Norton, Sonoma County PDA 由唐娜諾頓， Sonoma縣的PDA
On January 25th, I had a telephone conversation (40 mins +) with a legislative assistant in Conyers’ office regarding impeachment.於1月25日，我進行了電話交談（ 40分鐘+ ）與立法助理康亞斯辦公室關於彈劾。 He had obviously been well-instructed on how to express their current policy.他顯然一直深受指示，就如何表達自己的現行政策。 Our conversation included both Bush and Cheney, and took some strange turns, but this is basically the stand they’re taking:我們的談話既包括布什和切尼，並拍攝了一些奇怪的轉折，但是，這是基本的立場，他們正在考慮：
* Impeachment’s not necessary. *彈劾的，沒有必要。 The next election will take care of EVERYTHING. 下次選舉時會照顧一切。 Just ELECT DEMOCRATS. 剛剛當選民主黨。 (This chorus was repeated throughout our discussion.) （這是合唱團多次在我們整個討論） 。
* A sitting President is not subject to court actions. *坐在總統是不受法院的行動。 Nothing in the Constitution says a President is subject to the law.沒有在憲法中說，總統必須遵守法律。 He finally conceded this remains an “unsettle” question in the courts.他終於作出讓步，這仍是一個"不安"的問題提交法院審理。 (I insisted on documentation to support his statements, and he emailed me a Congressional report, 1978 “CRS Report for Congress” #98-186 A, on impeachment, about 30 pgs.) （我堅持文件，以支持他的言論，他寄給我一個國會的報告， 1978年"的CRS報告，為國會" ＃ 98-186 ，就彈劾案中，約有30前列腺素） 。
* Congress does not have an OBLIGATION or duty to investigate or take any action to prevent a President from breaking the law or abusing his powers. *國會沒有義務或責任進行調查，或採取任何行動，以防止總統違法或濫用他的權力。 It’s totally up to THEIR DISCRETION.它完全達到自己的酌處權。
* It’s okay for their decision to be based on party politics rather than Constitutional considerations because the decision is solely theirs to make. *它的好，為他們的決定必須基於政黨政治，而不是憲政的考慮，因為這個決定純粹是自己的抉擇。
* The courts can follow up with any illegal acts of the President or Vice-President AFTER they’re out of office, and all will be fine. *法院可以跟進任何非法行為的總統或副總統後，他們出門在外的辦公室，一切都將被罰款。
* Correcting power-abuse really has no meaning because power is what it’s all about. *糾正權力濫用，實在沒有意義，因為權力是什麼的一回事。 They all abuse it.他們都濫用權力。 So what?那又怎樣呢？ It’s just politics.它的政治正義。
We both agreed that according to what he was telling me, it boils down to the following:我們一致認為，根據是什麼，他告訴我，它歸結為以下幾點：
A sitting President is not subject to the law as long as he remains in office.一名坐總統是不受法律，只要他留在辦公室。 He can CONTINUE to break laws as long as he remains in office.他可以繼續破壞法律，只要他留在辦公室。 He can only be removed DURING his term of office (and therefore become subject to the law) through impeachment.他只能拆除在他的任期（並因此成為受法律） ，通過彈劾案。 Only Congress can impeach, and it’s solely up to their DISCRETION.只有國會可以彈劾，它的純粹了自己的酌處權。 So, as long as Congress successfully blocks the impeachment process, they are willfully allowing the President to remain completely outside the law, condoning that principle, and, in effect, shielding him from being removed from office so that he will be subject to the law and can be prosecuted.所以，只要國會成功阻止彈劾案過程中，他們隨意，讓總統保持完全在法律之外，寬恕這種原則，而在實際上，包庇他被解除了職務，讓他將受到法律可被檢控。 Congress has no OBLIGATION to intervene.國會也沒有義務進行干預。
The aide seemed not the least bit disturbed by the gravity or import of my conclusions.該幕僚似乎一點也不感到不安的嚴重性或進口的，我的結論。 It is, after all, just politics.它畢竟是政治正義。 And, by the way, electing Democrats to office will take care of everything (just in case I forgot to mention that). ，並通過該方式，選舉產生民主黨辦公室會照顧一切（剛才的情況我忘了提一提） 。
Bush 布什 Section has more related reports 科更多相關報導 Help keep RINF going..有利於保持rinf去..Comment on 'Bush Allowed To Continue Violating Laws' : 評論布什允許繼續違反法律， ' ：
One Response to “Bush Allowed To Continue Violating Laws”一回應"布什讓其繼續存在違反法律"
jared gordon 隊的戈登
Posted: 張貼：
Feb 5th, 2008 2008年2月5日
At 11:45 pm 在下午11時45分
Related News: 相關新聞：
Only in a culture which has become as corrupt, dysfunctional complacent and clueless as ours would the aide’s “thinking” seem reasonable and rational, and acceptable.只有在一個文化，它已成為腐敗，功能失調而自滿，沒有頭緒，因為我們會助手的"思想" ，似乎是合理和理性的，可以接受的。 NWO “talking points” are not acceptable to me. nwo "談話要點" ，是不能夠接受我。 How about you?如何你呢？