Progresivo
Activismo de los medios
Cargamento…
| Registro | ¿Contraseña perdida? | Boletín de noticias
Una contraseña será enviada a usted. Conexión | ¿Contraseña perdida?
Un email le será enviado. Conexión | Registro
Traduzca:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Herramientas: Noticias | Comentario del poste | Versión de la impresora | Email al amigo

Jueves 6 de septiembre de 2007

Vota el `rechazado automáticamente'

Comparta este artículo:

Estos iconos se ligan a los sitios bookmarking sociales en donde los lectores pueden compartir y descubrir nuevos Web pages.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Mancha
  • Fark

Papeles de la balota, mayo de 2007 Los diez de millares de votos en la elección de Holyrood fueron rechazados por las máquinas de cuenta sin ningún juicio humano, BBC Escocia han aprendido. Una investigación ha establecido que las máquinas fueron programadas para rechazar algunos de los papeles nuevos de la balota del estilo automáticamente.

Nunca aparecieron en las pantallas que se desafiarán por los partidos o juzgadas volviendo a oficiales.

La oficina de Escocia dicha allí no era ninguna evidencia que agregó a la confusión del votante.

It added that, in the instance of auto-adjudication for the 3 May election, the decision was taken between returning officers and the e-counting provider.

However, First Minister Alex Salmond described the development as “astonishing” and deeply disturbing.

“I was under the impression - until this revelation - that the ballots that were rejected were actually seen by the election agents as part of the process,” he said.

More than 140,000 ballots were spoilt on 3 May when votes were held for the Scottish Parliament.

Tens of thousands more ballots were rejected for the local authority elections, which were held on the same day, under a separate electoral system.

One of the enduring images of election night was of candidates and agents scrutinising screens showing the rejected ballots.

However, the BBC has learned that in some contests, more than half of all the “spoilt” ballots were rejected without any human adjudication.

The machines were set to auto-adjudicate if they thought they had a Holyrood ballot paper with a cross in one column but apparently no mark in the other.

Human adjudication

In those circumstances the machine would count the good vote, reject the other one and automatically put the ballot paper in the pile alongside all the correctly-completed ballots.

Shadow Scottish secretary David Mundell said he was “appalled” by the claims.

“Unfortunately it has become part of a series of revelations. Right from the start the Scotland Office did not come clean about the mishandling of the elections,” he told BBC Scotland.

The Tory MP claimed that information had to be “dragged out of” the Scotland Office.

He said: “Rather than putting their hands up and saying ‘we made a complete hash of this and we apologise to the people of Scotland’, they’ve just continued to show arrogance and contempt, as if somehow it was nothing to do with them.”

Mr Mundell’s Lib Dem opposite number, Alistair Carmichael, added that the auto-adjudicate decision was “inappropriate”.

“Individual decisions should have been taken by returning officers in consultation with the machine operating company,” he said.

A spokesman for the Scottish Green Party said that the review of the election must leave no stone unturned in order to get to the bottom of the problems.

He added: “We are particularly concerned that the review of the election may only look at samples of rejected ballot papers rather than all of them. It is important that the review is absolutely thorough.”

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Ballots ‘rejected automatically’' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Uproar: Bush official’s quip on black voters
  • 20 percent of election printouts were unreadable
  • Holyrood puts ID cards plan under scrutiny
  • Plan to ‘hijack’ bus passes as ID cards
  • Most vote machines lose test to hackers

  • This entry was posted on Thursday, September 6th, 2007 at 7:38 pm and is filed under Breaking . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 408 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion - 700 Total Comments

    Gov gags “extraordinary renditions” whistleblower « Dr Nasir Khan on Gov gags “extraordinary renditions” whistleblower

    Reverse Phone Detective Review on New - RINF Alternative Newsletter

    Breaking News