Progressivo
Activism di mezzi
Caricamento…
| Registro | Parola d'accesso persa? | Bollettino
Una parola d'accesso sarà spedita a voi. Inizio attività | Parola d'accesso persa?
Un email sarà trasmesso voi. Inizio attività | Registro
Traduca:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Attrezzi: Notizie | Commento dell'alberino | Versione dello stampatore | Email all'amico

Venerdì 21 settembre 2007

Spinta degli arabi con il voto nucleare contro l'Israele

Ripartisca questo articolo:

Queste icone si collegano ai luoghi bookmarking sociali in cui i lettori possono ripartire e scoprire i nuovi Web pagi.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Macchia
  • Fark

AFP

L'arabo dichiara il giovedì spinto con una risoluzione all'agenzia atomica Israele chiaramente puntato su di NU, richiedente Medio Oriente esente dalle armi nucleari.

Il cane da guardia che di NU l'Agenzia Internazionale per l'Energia Atomica (IAEA) ha adottato una risoluzione Egiziano-patrocinata su una arma-libero-zona nucleare nel Medio Oriente con l'Israele e gli Stati Uniti che votano contro e UE dichiara tranne l'Irlanda che si astiene.

La mancanza di consenso ha indebolito l'effetto della misura, ad un congresso generale 144 della nazione IAEA.

La risoluzione è stata sostenuta da 53 voti, con due contro e da 47 astensioni.

The IAEA has a tradition of adopting resolutions by consensus but the Middle East issue has become highly politicized, even though Israel backs a nuclear weapons-free-zone (NWFZ) within the framework of a Middle East peace settlement.

Some Western and non-aligned diplomats said the problem this year was that Iran was agitating behind the scenes for a showdown over Israel, in order to distract from its own nuclear programme.

One Western diplomat said the large abstention vote, which included Australia, Canada, Georgia, Ghana and Zambia, “shows that the world is hanging together on these matters.”

But the Iranian speaker blasted the vote as putting into question the views of “some members that full-scope safeguards” need be complemented by wider inspection measures, as Israel, which has not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) seemed to be exempt from this.

An Irish diplomat said his country had voted for the text since Ireland favored a NWFZ in the Middle East. “It’s as simple as that,” the diplomat said.

The general conference approves broad policy lines for the 144-member IAEA, the verification arm of the NPT.

But the IAEA’s 35-nation board of governors makes decisions for the agency on how policy is implemented.

The contested resolution, backed by the Arab League, contained two new paragraphs that were added to past texts and which Israel felt expanded the scope of the resolution too much, diplomats said.

The first called on “all states of the region, pending the establishment of the zone, not to develop, produce, test or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or permit the stationing on their territories … of nuclear weapons.”

The second new paragraph urged “nuclear-weapons states and all other states to render assistance in the establishment of the zone.”

Israel neither confirms nor denies it has nuclear weapons.

The Arab states insist, however, that the Jewish state does have such weapons and is a danger to peace and stability in the Middle East.

Traditionally at the IAEA’s general conference, Arab states introduce a separate resolution on the Israeli nuclear threat but in the face of strong Western opposition withdraw it.

It is then postponed to the following year in return for Israel agreeing to a call for a NWFZ in the Middle East.

This arrangement fell apart for the first time at last year’s general conference, when the NWFZ resolution was adopted by a vote of 89-2.

This year Egypt refused to compromise on the text, even though the Europeans and the United States offered a consensus on the previous year’s version of the resolution.

“They could have had consensus but look at the hash they have made of it now,” a non-aligned diplomat said.

US ambassador Gregory Schulte said he was disappointed at the lack of consensus.

Israel’s atomic energy chief Gideon Frank said that “for 14 years until last year, Israel has supported a consensus resolution” but could not this year due to Egypt’s unwillingness to negotiate on the hardened text, as well as on the resolution condemning Israel as a nuclear threat.

This second resolution has not yet been presented to the general conference, which ends Friday.

Egyptian ambassador Ehab Fawzy said the weapons-free-zone text had “not been amended for the last 15 years” and even so consensus failed to be reached last year.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Arabs push through nuclear vote against Israel' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • US, Israel collude against Iran
  • Hillary Clinton Is Willing to Nuke Iran
  • Israeli satellite to spy on Iran
  • Israel Says Tension with Syria Subsiding
  • North Korea accuses US of helping Israel develop nuclear weapons

  • This entry was posted on Friday, September 21st, 2007 at 12:56 pm and is filed under Breaking . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 473 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion - 646 Total Comments

    Israel threatens ‘holocaust’ in Gaza « Israel’s 60th Birthday on Israeli War Minister Threatens Palestinian Holocaust

    Breaking News