気候の行為のHeathrowの抗議のためのキャンプの適用範囲のための出版物の番犬が非難する標準を均等にする。 支えられる製作の要求。

大いに待たれる 支配 出版物の不平の任務 (PCC)に対して刺すような譴責を出した 標準を均等にすること 今日。 通常温厚なPCCは`としてHeathrowで標準の気候の行為のための去年の夏のキャンプの適用範囲を物質的に」誤解および`の」人騒がせな人ばたんと閉めた。 夕方の標準は運ぶために強制される 当然卓越性との今日支配.

去年8月13日に、標準は見出しを付けられた第一面の物語を動かした `の過激派は当るHeathrowに」 開くHeathrow空港の近くの気候変動の抗議のキャンプの前日に。 Chief reporter Robert Mendick said he had uncovered a plot to paralyse the airport via invading runways and placing suspect packages. The story was subsequently echoed in several media outlets, all of which ran the false claims believing them to be true. The Camp for Climate Action immediately wrote to the PCC declaring that the article was “fabricated”. The PCC adjudicated the complaint as “upheld”.

The PCC gave the strongest possible reprimand in its powers, finding that the article was a ’serious breach’ of the PCC code of journalistic standards. They found that “adequate care had not been taken” by the Standard, despite the Standard’s claim that their reporting was the result of an ‘extensive operation organised by an extremely experienced team of executives and senior reporters’[Doug Wills, Letter to PCC, February 12, 2007].

The rare PCC ruling comes after seven months’ worth of submissions, in which the story’s authorship, sources and credibility are all called into question. Alexandra Harvey, one of the team responsible for pulling apart the Standard’s story, said today:

“This was a political hit job of the worst kind. There was no plot, and the Standard’s ever changing claims throughout this process show that this was a fiction created for political ends - to stop the growth of a mass movement taking action on climate change”.

Chief reporter Robert Mendick has previously denied writing the very article he authored and the PCC condemned. The Standard subsequently claimed the story was the work of a different junior journalist, Rashid Razaq, working undercover.

Mr Razaq has a history of being accused of fabrications which the Standard has ignored. Last year Mr Razaq wrote a story falsely alleging the showing of films sympathetic to terrorists at the Freud Museum. The alleged interviewee said the interview Mr Razaq reported in the article never took place. A complaint by the museum’s director and curator was never answered. An undercover story by Mr Razaq about his work at Barnet Hospital as a cleaner was called into question when the Hospital stated that he was in fact employed as a porter, and had misreported significant facts. “This is a disturbing pattern, and the Standard ought to examine why Mr Razaq was allowed to continue writing these stories for so long,” said Ms Harvey.

Natasha Edlemann said, “This summer will see increased direct action aimed at stopping climate change. This growing movement expects and deserves scrutiny from the media, but we need to draw a line under dangerous propaganda by those who claim to care about climate change while seeking to destroy the reputations of the people who are actually doing something about it.”

This year’s Camp for Climate Action will take place 4 to 11 August at Kingsnorth power station in Kent. Everyone is invited to join in.

For all the documents and more details, visit Anatomy of a fabrication

http://www.climatecamp.org.uk

Comment on 'Tabloid Fabricated Heathrow Plot' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News: