|
|
ترجمت:
             
بريطانيا يمشي نوم داخل شرطة دولة بما أنّ إنشقاق سياسيّة يكون [كريمينليسد]
يوم الإثنين, أبريل - نيسان [20ث], 2009
يكتب جولي [هلند]: ? من وثيق فاسدة ينشأ مأساة لانهائيّة? العالم كتب [وب ست] اشتراكيّة, يعلق على الدولة تنفيذ من عاملة بريئة برازيليّة, جان شارلز [د] [منزس], ب [بلينكلوثس] شرطيات على لندن طريق تحتيّ قافلة تموين في يوليو-تمّوز 22, 2005. يؤكّد حادثات يتلقّى مأساويّا أنّ إنذار. في السنون منذ [منزس]? شرّعت يقتل, ل أيّ لا أحد يتلقّى في أيّ وقت يكون أمسكت أن يحسب, ال [لغل فرموورك] من شرطة دولة يتلقّى يكون في بريطانيا. جعلت التضمنات من هذا يتلقّى يكون بوضوح على الأسابيع متأخّرة. بما أنّ البداية أبريل - نيسان, بعض 300 الناس يتلقّى يكون أوقفت واحتجزت في فقط ثلاثة شرطة عمليات. دوّرت ال [فست مجوريتي] من هذا كان فوق في اثنان من هذا عمليات, كلا [فوكسنغ] على تهديد مزعومة إلى? أمر عامّة?. يبقي أمر عامّة الآن اسم مستعار ل ال [كريمينليز] من إنشقاق سياسيّة. حتّى قبل أن ال [غ20] بدأ قمة من عالم زعيمات في لندن, خمسة الناس كان أوقفت في بليموث تحت الإرهاب عمل, بشكل تقريريّ يتّهم من يملك? مادة [رلتينغ تو] مذهب سياسيّة?. أطلقت كلّ كان دون حشوة, غير أنّ الحقيقة أنّ فعالية سياسيّة اعتبرت مخالفات إجراميّة في [21ست سنتثري] بريطانيا كان فيما بعد كتابة كبيرة على الشوارع من الرأس مال. يبدأ أبريل - نيسان 1, ضخمة شرطة ثبتت عملية كان [إين بلس] حول ال [غ20] قمة. كان مئات الالناس, قانونيّا يتدرّب حقهم أن يحتجّ? [كتّلد]?? قسرا يمسك خلف شرطة نطق ل [أوب تو] سبعة ساعات? في الشوارع جانبيّة من لندن مركزية. هو كان خلف واحدة من هذا نطق أنّ أيان [توملينسن]? يحاول أن يجعل طريقه بيتيّة بعد عمل? كان هاجمت من خلفيّة ب [بتون-ويلدينغ] يقنع ضابط شرطة. هو مات أعزام فيما بعد. شاهد عيان يحسب, قياس قدميّة مرئيّة وصورة [ستيلّس] يزوّدون برهان نهائيّة أنّ الشرطة? [س] كان هجوم ضدّ [توملينسن] [بر] للمسلك أثناء الإحتجاجات. الشرطة تلقّى أعمال لاشيء أن يتمّ مع يضمن? أمان عامّة?. إن أيّ شيء, هم مثّل محاولة متعمّدة أن يستثير اضطراب كالذريعة لقمع بعيد. هذا سطّرت ببيّنة من [بلين-كلوثس] ضابطات يسلّح مع عصي يصيب خارجا في عارضات, [أس ولّ س] المشاركة من الإقليميّة دعم مجموعة? خاصّة [قوس-برميليتري] شرطة وحدة أيّ كان تضمّنت في عدّة من ال أكثر يعلن حادثات, والذي [إيدنتيفيكأيشن نومبر] كان أخفيت. Downloads of film footage of the police in action at the G20 protests is said to be particularly high in Brazil?Menezes? birthplace, and a country bitterly familiar with police savagery against political dissidents. For good reason, the government attempted to ensure that its ?public order? policy would not see the light of day. While police now routinely photograph and demand the identification and addresses of people taking part in lawful demonstrations, watching the watchers is illegal in New Labour?s Orwellian dystopia. Less than one month before the protests, section 76 of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 came into force, providing for the arrest and imprisonment of anyone taking photographs of police officers. In one instance during the G20 protests, recorded on camera, police officers instructed photographers and news crews to leave the vicinity within 30 minutes or face arrest. This in a country whose population is now one of the most heavily surveilled in the world. The UK has the greatest concentration of closed circuit TV cameras per head of population. Moreover, without any parliamentary debate let alone public consent, recent legislation has compelled all Internet service providers to retain data from emails and website visits for up to one year. Details of phone calls and text messages can be similarly stored, and made available to the government and other official agencies. As if such powers were not enough for police to be aware of the movements of any potentially ?significant? individuals, on April 13, police in Nottingham carried out the unprecedented ?pre-emptive? arrests of 114 people. No crime had been committed. The arrests were made purely on the basis that the police ?suspected? a plan by environmentalists to target a power station in Nottingham. While no charges have as yet been made, the arrests were used to mount a trawling operation, raiding homes and seizing personal papers and computers. In between the London and Nottingham operations, police in the north-west of England mounted major ?anti-terror? raids, involving dozens of armed officers. Twelve men, mainly foreign students, were detained as part of what was claimed to be an operation against an imminent terrorist attack. Once again no charges have been made. Under British anti-terror laws, suspects can be held for 28 days without charge. It is widely reported that no evidence has so far been recovered to substantiate claims of a terrorist emergency. All the recent police operations are predicated on the more than 200 pieces of separate anti-terror legislation enacted by the Labour government over the last years, and consolidated in the Terrorism Act 2006 which criminalises the mere expression of opinion deemed unacceptable by the Home Secretary. At the time, then Prime Minister Tony Blair defended the measures on the grounds that political exigencies meant the ?rules of the game? had changed. This established a new legal principle?guilty on the say-so of the powers-that-be. The ?rules? now in operation are those where armed police swoops and the targeting of political dissent is a matter of routine. In February this year, in a move which received barely any coverage, the Association of Chief Police Officers set up the Confidential Intelligence Unit, targeted at ?domestic extremists?. Assuming the ?counter-subversion? functions usually conducted by MI5, the CIU is dedicated to the surveillance of radical groups, including placing informers amongst their numbers. The assault on civil liberties is not specific to Britain. It is a tendency evidenced throughout the so-called ?advanced democracies?. Indeed proclamations of ?democracy? increasingly function as a thin veneer, behind which the state has abrogated to itself near autocratic powers. That this finds no principled opposition from within the ruling establishment or its liberal ?critics? must serve as a warning. The essential driving force behind the adoption of such dictatorial methods is not the maintenance of ?public order?, but the need to defend the existing order, preserving the wealth and power of a privileged few at the expense of working people under conditions of the greatest breakdown in the world capitalist economy since the 1930s. The defence of democratic rights requires breaking the monopoly of the financial oligarchy and its representatives over political life. This can only be achieved through the independent initiative of the working class, fighting for the reorganisation of society on a socialist basis. Have Your Say: Britain Sleep Walks Into a Police State as Political Dissent is Criminalised Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
Just say No to Crap from paul w. ! Last post by paul w @ 03:57 AM
Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
9/11 Citizen Investigation. Last post by paul w @ 03:14 AM Contaminated Baxter Vaccine An ?Attempt to Provoke Pandemic?? Last post by initiatrix @ 02:53 AM Just Say No To Crap YouTube Clips! Last post by paul w @ 02:41 AM It's past time that the 7/7 and 9/11 forums were moved out of the Fringe. Last post by initiatrix @ 02:25 AM Federal Court Reinstates Torture Flight Lawsuit Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 10:34 PM Orbital Power Plant Dummies' Guide. Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 10:25 PM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
![[رينف] ساحة](http://www.rinf.com/grunge-nav/GRUNGE-NAV_02.gif){kind=small}
Loading ...
