by Citizen Sage由公民賢者

The unanswered questions about 9-11 can no longer be ignored.這個懸而未決的問題約9-11再也不能被忽視。 A new, more comprehensive investigation by the US Congress is required, given all of the unusual circumstantial evidence on 9-11.一個新的，更全面的調查是由美國國會要求，考慮到所有的不尋常的間接證據就9-11 。 Although it happened 6 years ago, the questions just won’t go away.雖然事發6年前，剛剛的問題不會自動消失。 Unless such an investigation is done, the conspiracy theories will only gain more traction with the American people and call into doubt what really happened forever more.除非這種調查是做的，陰謀論，將只能獲得更多的牽引與美國人民，並呼籲到懷疑到底發生了什麼，永遠更多。 Because of the importance of 9-11 in launching America on a War on Terror and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the issues demand closer review, than what now appears to have been a whitewash by the first 9-11 Commission.由於問題的重要性， 9-11在美國發動對反恐戰爭及阿富汗戰爭和伊拉克戰爭，問題的需求更仔細地審查，比什麼，現在似乎已是粉飾由第一9-11委員會。

In Project for a New American Century, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and other prominent neo-cons called for a new “Pearl Harbor” in order to create a pretext for curtailing American civil liberties and embarking on pre-emptive wars against regimes they did not like.在工程項目為新美國世紀，切尼，拉姆斯菲爾德和其他著名新保守派呼籲建立一個新的"珍珠港" ，以創造一個藉口，削減美國公民自由並走出了先發製人的戰爭對政權，他們沒有像。 It is now known that Cheney, Rumsfeld and other neo-cons within the Bush Administration were planning a war on Iraq long before 9-11, just as they are now planning for pre-emptive strikes on Iran in defiance of the wishes of the majority of the American people.現在是眾所周知，切尼，拉姆斯菲爾德和其他新保守派與布什政府正計劃對伊拉克的戰爭之前很久9-11 ，正如他們現正計劃為先發製人的打擊，對伊朗無視絕大多數居民意願對美國人民。

On 9/11/2001, Dick Cheney was coordinating multiple war games intended to prepare for the type of terrorist strike that happened.於2001年9月11日，切尼目前正在協調多重戰爭遊戲的打算，準備類型的恐怖襲擊發生。 Due to the war games, military personnel that would otherwise be available to respond to 9-11 were otherwise engaged.由於戰爭遊戲，軍事人員，否則可答复9-11人，否則從事。 Cheney instructed NORAD defenses to stand down that day.切尼指示與NORAD防站下來那一天。 He even instructed that flight 77 be allowed to proceed without being intercepted.他甚至發出指示， 77個航班被允許進行而不被攔截。 Why would that be, if it was not a false flag event?為什麼會是這樣的，如果它不是一個虛假國旗事件？

After the first plane flew into WTC, George W. Bush was strangely unperturbed and continued to read a book to elementary school children, despite it obviously being an disaster of international proportions.之後，第一架飛機飛抵世台會中，布什被奇怪地不受干擾地，並繼續讀一本書，讀小學的孩子，儘管它顯然是一個災難的國際比例。 When he finished his visit to the school, he was unable to reach Dick Cheney for an additional period of about 20 minutes, vital time that could have been used to send rescue helicopters to WTC.當他完成了他來上學，他卻無法達到切尼增加一項為期約20分鐘後，重要的時間本來是可以用來發送救援直升機，向世台會。 Could it be that it was not a complete surprise?是否認為這並非是完全出人意料？

George W. Bush claimed that there were no prior indications of a 9-11 event, however in August, he received an intelligence briefing report that specifically indicated that Osama Bin Ladin was thought to be planning a major terrorist event and that hijacking of planes was a possible scenario.布什聲稱，有事前並沒有跡象顯示，一個9-11事件，但在8月，他收到一份情報簡報報告說，具體表明烏薩馬本拉登被認為策劃重大恐怖事件，並劫持飛機被一個可能的方案。 A NORAD war game planning event before 9-11 made specific reference to Osama and hijacking.一與NORAD戰爭遊戲策劃活動前9-11提出了具體的參考烏薩馬和劫持。 There were numerous warnings from foreign intelligence services indicating a heightened risk for terrorism.有無數次警告，從外國情報機構服務，顯示高度的風險為恐怖主義辯護。 However, Bush was either ignoring these indicators and/or being dishonest about it.然而，布什要么無視這些指標和/或不誠實態度。

Marvin Bush, George W. Bush’s brother, was directly responsible for the security of the World Trade Center buildings from the 1992 terrorist bombing attack until September 11, 2001.張建東布什，布什奇摩兄弟，是直接責任人的責任，為保障世界貿易中心大廈，從1992年起恐怖爆炸襲擊，直到2001年9月11日。 Ownership of the WTC buildings was changed and insurance for terrorist acts was increased dramatically only several weeks before 9-11.擁有世貿中心大廈被改變和保險為恐怖行為是急劇上升，僅幾個星期前， 9-11 。

Various survivor/witnesses of 9-11 reported hearing explosions just before and as the buildings collapsed.各倖存者/證人9-11稱聽到爆炸前，由於建築物倒塌。 Authorities attempted to suppress these stories.當局試圖壓制這些故事。 Brigham Young Physics Professor J. Jones analyzed dust from the collapsed WTC buildings and found evidence of demolition explosives.楊百翰物理學教授j.瓊斯分析了灰塵從倒塌的世貿中心大廈，並找到證據的拆卸炸藥。 When the buildings collapsed, they came down at free fall speed, despite having been built to withstand many times their weight and specifically, a plane wreck.當建築物倒塌，他們一齊壓在自由落體的速度，儘管他已經修到了經受住了很多次自己的體重，並具體說，飛機殘骸。 Photos of the metal beams show visual evidence of liquidization of the metal, due to demolition chemicals.照片的金屬橫梁查看視覺的證據liquidization的金屬，由於拆遷化學品。 Videos of other high rises that were purposefully felled by demolition show similar free fall characteristics.影片的其他高樓有針對性地砍伐，由拆遷顯示出類似自由落體的特點。

However, where demolition was not done, collapsed high rises do not fall so neatly and larger pieces remain standing.然而，如果拆除卻沒有這樣做，倒塌的高樓不屬於這麼整齊和較大件屹立不搖。 The heat required to melt the structural elements of the WTC buildings would not be created by aircraft fuel, similar to kerosene.熱須熔體的結構組件世貿中心大廈將不會創造的飛機燃料，類似煤油。 Also, the amount of debris from the WTC buildings’ should have been much greater and there should have been many more larger pieces of debris if the building’s collapse did not involve additional accelerants.同時，保額的碎片從世貿中心大廈'應該已經大得多，並應該有更多更大的碎片，如果該建築的崩潰並不涉及額外accelerants 。

Some analysts indicate that the preponderance of fine dust is indicative of possible use of small hydrogen bombs, of the type only available from Israel’s Dimona Nuclear Reactor.一些分析家指出， preponderance細粉塵，顯示可能使用小型氫彈的類型只能從以色列的迪莫納核反應堆。 There were several suspicious Israelis who were detained after the 9-11 WTC terrorist explosions, apparently after being seen repeatedly giving each other “high five” celebratory congratulations.有幾個可疑的以色列人被扣留後9-11個世貿中心的恐怖爆炸事件，顯然是經過多次看到，讓對方的"高五"慶祝祝賀。 They were quitly released, without explanation.他們quitly釋放，沒有作出任何解釋。 This sequence of events could be seen as eerily paralleling what happened in 1967 when Israel was accused by American survivors of deliberately attempting to sink the USS liberty and kill all aboard.這一系列事件可以被看作是並行的炮火所發生的事情，在1967年時，以色列被指責美國倖存者故意試圖擊沉一艘人身自由和殺死全部遇難。 Israel has a history of fabricating pretexts for pre-emptive strikes on Arab neighbors, including in 1956 and 1967 against Egypt.以色列有一個歷史的編造藉口，先發製人的打擊，對阿拉伯鄰國，其中包括在1956年和1967年對埃及。 Israel has been a srong proponent first of the war on Iraq and now on Iran.以色列一直srong倡議者首先對伊拉克的戰爭，現在就伊朗。

That the FBI confiscated and destroyed all photos of the plane that hit the Pentagon on 9-11 begs the question of why all the secrecy, if there was nothing to hide?說，聯邦調查局沒收並銷毀了所有的照片，這架飛機襲擊五角大樓9-11迴避的問題，為什麼所有的秘密，如果說有沒有什麼要隱瞞？ Sure, there was damage done and people killed, but why no photos of the airplane as it came in or after it collided?當然，也有被破壞，以及人喪生，但為什麼沒有照片的飛機在這之前或之後，它相撞？ Some conspiracy theorists believe it might have been a different plane or even a missile that hit the Pentagon.一些陰謀論者認為，它可能是一個不同的飛機，甚至是導彈襲擊五角大樓。 Some believe that one of the planes that hit the WTC was actually a Boeing fueling plane有的認為，其中的飛機襲擊世貿中心，實際上是波音飛機加油

Why WTC7 collapsed at 5:30 pm, many hours after the planes collided into the other two towers is very curious indeed.為什麼wtc7倒塌在下午5點30分，很多個小時後，飛機相撞成其他兩塔，是很好奇。 It also fell without any resistence from its structual beams.它也下跌沒有任何抵抗，從它的結構橫梁。 Physics cannot explain how that would hapopen unassisted.物理學無法解釋如何將hapopen無人。 The only logical explanation is that it was helped along with demolition charges and indeed such evidence was found in the debris.唯一合乎邏輯的解釋是，這是幫助隨著拆遷費用和確實的證據，如被發現在廢墟中。

Despite assurances that a recurrence of 9-11 was impossible, five years later, a small plane again flew into a New York City highrise.儘管保證重演9-11是不可能的， 5年後，一架小飛機又飛進一個新的紐約市高層。 This time it was an American baseball player who was the pilot and it was an apartment building that was hit.這個時候，它是美國棒球選手，誰是試點，這是一座公寓大樓被擊中。 What if it had been al-Qaeda and the plane had been full of explosives?如果它已被基地組織和機上已充滿了炸藥？ Just as with the WTC terrorist event, there was not a single government official who took responsibility for allowing this to happen!如以往一樣，世貿中心的恐怖事件，有沒有一個政府官員負責，讓這種事情發生！ If Americans had to give uyp civil liberties, due tot he so-called “Patriot Act”, why shouldn’t someone in government be required to accept responsibility and resign?如果美國人不得不放棄uyp公民自由，因為他以TOT以所謂的"愛國者法案" ，為什麼不應該有人在政府必須承擔責任，引咎辭職？ In other countries, that would happen.在其他國家，這種情況便會發生。

Whether there was active participation by the Bush Administration or 9-11 was merely allowed to happen, whether or not there was involvement by Israelis or even whether or not it was perpetrated by al-Qaeda, we deserve a full and open investigation.是否有積極的參與，布什政府或9-11只不過是不允許發生的，不論是否有被捲入由以色列人甚至無論它犯下的蓋達組織，我們應當有一個全面和公開的調查。 There are enough loose ends that 9-11 conspiracy theorists will always be convinced that we were not given the whole story, unless a comprehensive investigation is made public.有足夠多的枝節問題即9-11陰謀理論家將始終深信，我們並未獲得整個故事，除非全面調查，是向公眾公佈。 We deserve to know what really happened, regardless of where the chips fall.我們應該知道到底發生了什麼，不管在何地晶片下降。 The implications are too profound to ignore and pretend that it has been put to rest.含義太深刻的忽視，假裝稱，它一直把休息。 The evidence points towards a cover-up or worse.證據指向掩蓋起來，甚至更糟糕。 The issues are too serious to leave things as they are.這個問題太嚴重，以假的東西作為他們的影響。 America deserves answers, not obsfucation.美國不愧答案，而不是obsfucation 。

Comment on '9/11 - Was the Bush administration complicit?' : 評論9 / 11 -是布什政府共犯？ ' ：

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Related News: 相關新聞：