US Navy ‘Top Gun’ Pilot Questions 9/11美海軍'頂槍'試點問題9 / 11
By 由 Alan Miller 阿蘭米勒
US Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot, Commander Ralph Kolstad, started questioning the official account of 9/11 within days of the event. “It just didn’t make any sense to me,” he said. And now 6 years after 9/11 he says, “When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story.” 美海軍'頂槍'的飛行員,指揮員拉爾夫kolstad ,開始質疑官方帳戶9 / 11幾天內,該項活動的" ,只是沒有任何意義,以我, "他說,現在六年後, 9 / 11日他說, "當一個人開始用自己的心,而不是一個人被告知,很少有相信,在官方的故事" 。
Now retired, Commander Kolstad was a top-rated fighter pilot during his 20-year Navy career. Early in his career, he was accorded the honor of being selected to participate in the Navy’s ‘Top Gun’ air combat school, officially known as the US Navy Fighter Weapons School. The Tom Cruise movie, “ Top Gun ” reflects the experience of the young Navy pilots at the school. Eleven years later, Commander Kolstad was further honored by being selected to become a ‘Top Gun’ adversary instructor. While in the Navy, he flew F-4 Phantoms, A-4 Skyhawks , and F-14 Tomcats and completed 250 aircraft carrier landings. 現在退休了,指揮官kolstad是一個一流的戰鬥機飛行員,在他長達20年的海軍生涯中,早在他的職業生涯,他被給予的榮譽被選中參加海軍的'頂槍'空戰學校, 正式名稱作為美國海軍戰鬥機武器學校。湯姆克魯斯主演的電影, " 頂炮 " ,反映的經驗對年輕的海軍飛行員,在校期間。十一年後,指揮官kolstad還榮幸地被選中成為'頂炮'的對手指導員而在海軍方面,他飛到架F - 4幻影, 4 skyhawks ,和 F - 14 tomcats並完成了250個航空母艦降落。
Commander Kolstad had a second career after his 20 years of Navy active and reserve service and served as a commercial airline pilot for 27 years, flying for American Airlines and other domestic and international careers. He flew Boeing 727, 757 and 767, McDonnell Douglas MD-80, and Fokker F-100 airliners. He has flown a total of over 23,000 hours in his career. 指揮官kolstad了第二個職業生涯後,他20多年的海軍現役和後備服務,並擔任一家商業航空公司飛行員27年來,飛行的美國航空公司和其他國內和國際的職業,他飛到波音727 , 757和767 ,麥道MD -80和福克的F - 100客機,他已遠走高飛,共有超過23000小時,他的職業生涯。
Commander Kolstad is especially critical of the account of American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon. He says, “At the Pentagon, the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying. I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757’s and 767’s and I could not have flown it the way the flight path was described.” 指揮官kolstad是特別重要的考慮,美國航空公司的77航班據稱,撞向五角大樓。他說, "在五角大樓,這個試驗的這架波音757客機也有不少功績的飛行,我有6000小時的飛行時間,在波音757和767的,我不可能遠走高飛,它的方式飛行方向是形容" 。
Commander Kolstad adds, “I was also a Navy fighter pilot and Air Combat Instructor and have experience flying low altitude, high speed aircraft. I could not have done what these beginners did. Something stinks to high heaven!” 指揮官kolstad補充說, "我也是一名海軍戰鬥機飛行員和空中作戰導師和有經驗的飛行,低空高速飛機,我不能做什麼,這些初學者做。東西發出異味,以高度的天堂" !
He points to the physical evidence at the Pentagon impact site and asks in exasperation, “Where is the damage to the wall of the Pentagon from the wings? Where are the big pieces that always break away in an accident? Where is all the luggage? Where are the miles and miles of wire, cable, and lines that are part and parcel of any large aircraft? Where are the steel engine parts? Where is the steel landing gear? Where is the tail section that would have broken into large pieces?” 他指出,以實物證據在五角大樓的影響,工地,並要求在惱怒, "哪裡是損壞的牆壁,五角大樓從翅膀?那裡有大作品總是擺脫在意外發生?那裡是所有行李?那裡是英里英里的電線,電纜,並線的重要組成部分,任何大型飛機?哪裡鋼鐵引擎零件?哪裡是鋼起落架?哪裡是機尾部分將闖入大塊? "
But no major element of the official account of 9/11 is spared from Commander Kolstad’s criticism. Regarding the alleged impact site of United Airlines Flight 93 near Shanksville, PA, he asks, “Where is any of the wreckage? Of all the pictures I have seen, there is only a hole! Where is any piece of a crashed airplane? Why was the area cordoned off, and no inspection allowed by the normal accident personnel? Where is any evidence at all?”不過並未傳出重大要素,官方帳戶9 / 11倖免,從指揮官kolstad的批評,對於被指控的影響,現場的美國聯合航空公司飛行93近shanksville ,壩,他問: "哪裡是任何飛機殘骸?所有照片,我看到了,是不是只有一個洞!如有任何一塊的失事飛機為何是地區封鎖,並沒有檢查所允許的正常事故人員哪是並沒有任何證據,在所有" ?
Commander Kolstad also questions many aspects of the attack on the World Trade Center. “How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just doesn’t add up.” 指揮官kolstad的問題,也是許多方面的攻擊,對世界貿易中心" ,如何能以鋼鐵和混凝土建築物倒塌後,擊中一架波音767嗎?並未工程師設計,它能夠頂住直接擊中,從波音707 ,大約有相同的尺寸和重量767嗎?證據,只是並不增加了" 。
“Why did the second building collapse before the first one, which had been burning for 20 minutes longer after a direct hit, especially when the second one hit was just a glancing blow? If the fire was so hot, then why were people looking out the windows and in the destroyed areas? Why have so many members of the New York Fire Department reported seeing or hearing many ‘explosions’ before the buildings collapsed?” "為什麼沒有第二座大樓倒塌前第一次,這已經燃燒了20分鐘後,不再直接襲擊,尤其是當第二次擊中的是只是看著打擊?如果火勢這麼熱,又為什麼被人看出來窗戶和在被摧毀的地區,為何有這麼多的成員,設在紐約的消防部門報告說,看見或聽力有很多'爆炸'之前的建築物倒塌" ?
Commander Kolstad summarized his frustration with the investigation and disbelief of the official account of 9/11, “If one were to act as an accident investigator, one would look at the evidence, and then construct a plausible scenario as to what led to the accident. In this case, we were told the story and then the evidence was built to support the story. What happened to any intelligent investigation? Every question leads to another question that has not been answered by anyone in authority. 指揮官kolstad概括了他的挫折感隨著調查和難以置信的官方帳戶9 / 11 , "如果一個人,以作為事故調查,一會研究證據,並且再建一個合理的情況下,以什麼導致意外在這種情況下,我們被告知了這個故事,那麼,是什麼證據興建,以支持這個故事,究竟發生了什麼智能調查?每一個問題會導致另一個問題時說,未獲任何權威。 This is just the beginning as to why I don’t believe the official ‘story’ and why I want the truth to be told.” 這只是一個開始,至於為什麼我不相信官方的'故事' ,所以我希望真相被告知" 。
Commander Kolstad is just one of the many military and commercial pilots who have publicly expressed serious concerns about the official account of 9/11. Statements from more than 30 other pilots are available at 指揮官kolstad只是其中的許多軍用和商用飛行員曾公開表示嚴重關切,這位官員到9 / 11 。報表由其他30多個飛行員,現已在 http://PatriotsQuestion911.com http://patriotsquestion911.com . 。
False Flag 虛假國旗 Section has more related reports 科更多相關報導 Help keep RINF going..有利於保持rinf去..Comment on 'US Navy ‘Top Gun’ Pilot Questions 9/11' : 評論'美國海軍'頂槍'試點問題9 / 11 ' :
Related News: 相關新聞:




























