The History of the Loose Change Phenomenon歷史上的鬆散變化現象

Tim Sparke添sparke

Introduction導言

9/11 has clearly been the most important event of the 21st century, providing the basis for the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and many other dimensions of the “war on terror.” There is, accordingly, no more important question than whether the official account of 9/11 is true. 9 / 11已顯然最重要的事件是21世紀，提供了依據，為美國入侵阿富汗及伊拉克和其他許多方面的"反恐戰爭" ，有爭論，因此，沒有更重要的問題，比否官方帳戶9 / 11是真實的。 The main purpose of the “Loose Change” series of films is to explore various unanswered questions about 9/11 - questions that, by virtue of being unanswered by any official body, raise doubts about the truth of the official account.主要目的是"鬆散的變化"的系列電影，是為了探討各種懸而未決的問題約9 / 11 -問題，憑藉正在解答任何官方機構，使人們懷疑關於真理的正式戶口。

Background To Loose Change Final Cut背景鬆散變化的Final Cut

“Loose Change I” and “Loose Change II” have been seen by millions, online, on TV and on DVD. "鬆散改變我"和"鬆散變化二" ，已被數百萬，在網上，在電視上和DVD上。 In the words of Vanity Fair ‘Loose Change 2 is the world’s first internet blockbuster, and if it were released theatrically would pack out Movie Houses’.在換句話說名利場'鬆散變動2是世界上第一個在互聯網上一鳴驚人的，如果它被釋放戲劇將包出電影之家' 。

Over 40 countries broadcast Loose Change 2 in 2006 and an estimated 50 million people have now downloaded the film online.Given this unprecedented interest in the subject and clear demand amongst the world community, we have decided to produce Loose Change: Final Cut for online pay per view and theatrical release in 2007.超過40個國家播出鬆散變動2 ，在2006年估計有50萬人，現在已經下載電影online.given這個前所未有的興趣，並明確要求，其中包括世界社會，我們決定生產鬆散變化：最後削減為在線支付每個版塊及舞台釋放在2007年。

By the very nature of this type of investigative film-making, flaws in the narrative become apparent when new information and new footage becomes available.由很自然的這種類型的調查，電影，缺點在敘事顯現的時候，新的信息和新畫面變得可用。 By virtue of overcoming those flaws and incorporating this new material, “Loose Change: Final Cut” is significantly different from, and better than, the earlier versions incorporating 80% new material, and amazing new evidence, checked for accuracy by Dr David Ray Griffin the foremost 9/11 academic.憑藉克服這些缺點，並把這種新的物質" ，鬆散的變化：的Final Cut " ，是顯著性差異，並優於，更早的版本，把百分之八十的新材料，並獲得驚人的新證據，並追查其準確性，由李國寶射線格里芬首要9 / 11學業。

Because of this, the film will thereby attract the millions who have seen Loose Change I and II as well as a new audience.正因為如此，電影，因而將吸引幾百萬人看到了鬆散變化I和II ，以及作為一個新的聽眾。 LC: Final Cut is the authoritative 9/11 movie, a genre busting critical success which will re-define the power and the importance of investigative documentary – a story of the Emperor’s New Clothes for the 21st Century.立法會：最後的削減是該權威人士9 / 11的電影，一個流派破壞關鍵的成功，將重新界定權力和重要性偵查紀錄片-記皇帝的新衣，為二十一世紀。

It will alter the way in which mankind views the concept of democratic accountability, and questions the concepts of right and wrong, truth and fiction.它會改變方式，在人類意見的概念，民主問責制，並質疑是非觀念，真理與謊言。

Loose Change: Final Cut is the most explosive, and most important, political film of the decade.鬆散的變化：最終削減，是最具爆炸性的，而且最重要的政治電影的十年。 Delivered in a contemporary accessible style, set to a rhythmic dynamic sound track and using the latest graphics technology, its mission is to prove that the official story of 9/11 cannot be true.發表在當代樣式，設置一個節奏動態，健康的軌道，並使用最新的圖形技術相結合，它的任務是要證明官方的故事9 / 11是不正確的。

Narrative敘事

The film is broken into segments:電影是打破分割成片斷：

• Pre 9/11 investigations into the activities of the alleged hijackers by the FBI. • 前9 / 11調查，將活動所指稱劫機者由聯邦調查局。

• The Pentagon attack • 五角大樓攻擊

• The collapses of WTC 1 and 2 • 坍塌的世貿中心1和2

• What happened to Flight 93. •有什麼事要飛行93 。

• The collapse of WTC 7. • 倒塌的世貿中心7 。

• The 9/11 Commission: What it failed to report. • 9 / 11委員會：它沒有報告。

• Does the evidence suggest we have been hoaxed? • 沒有證據表明，我們一直hoaxed ？

The opening segment begins news reports, provided by main stream media, the hijackers were trained at US Military Institutions and that some of the hijackers were still alive after 9/11.開幕式開始，部分新聞報導中，所提供的主要流媒體，劫機者人員進行了培訓，美國軍事院校和一些劫機犯還活著之後， 9 / 11 。 It then progresses into the ‘Able Danger’ hearings, which contradict the official version of events concerning surveillance of Mohamed Atta and others, and to mainstream reports that the alleged hijackers had received training at US military bases.然後進步到'能危險'聽證會，這違背了官方版本的事件監視穆罕默德阿塔等，並以主流報導說，據稱劫機者接受了培訓，在駐日美軍基地。

The film then examines the evidence that the US government had planned extensively for the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon despite vigorous denials of such activity and even sent FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) to the WTC site the night before 9/11.電影，然後探討了證據表示，美國政府曾計劃廣泛用於襲擊世貿中心和五角大樓，儘管作出了有力的否認這種活動，甚至派遣聯邦緊急措施（聯邦緊急管理機構） ，向世台會現場的前一天晚上9 / 11 。

The segment on the Pentagon provides visual, testimonial, and commonsense evidence showing the extremely unlikelihood of the official account, according to which the Pentagon was struck by AA 77 (a Boeing 757) under the control of al-Qaeda hijacker Hani Hanjour (who was known as a terrible pilot).該段對五角大樓提供視覺，取證，並根據常理證據顯示，極不大可能正式戶口，按照該計劃，五角大樓留下深刻機管局77 （波音757 ）控制下的蓋達組織劫機犯哈尼族中寫道（當時眾所周知，作為一個可怕的飛行員） 。 This segment will reveal Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta’s explosive testimony, before the 9/11 Commission, suggesting that Vice-President Cheney had issued a “stand-down” order regarding an aircraft approaching Washington DC shortly before the Pentagon was struck.這部分將揭示運輸部長峰田的爆炸性的證詞，前9 / 11委員會，暗示副總統切尼曾發出一份"立場下， "訂單關於飛機逼近華盛頓不久之前，五角大樓留下深刻。

The World Trade Centre segment provides various types of evidence - visual, testimonial, and scientific - against the official theory, which states that the collapses of WTC 1, and 2 were caused by externally caused damage plus fire.世界貿易中心的部分提供了各種種類的證據-視覺，取證和科學-對官方理論，其中指出，倒塌的世貿中心1日和2因對外造成了損害加火。 This evidence shows that these collapses must instead have been brought about in the same way that all other total collapses of steel-frame buildings have historically been brought about: by pre-planted explosives in the procedure known as controlled demolition.這一證據表明，這些倒塌，而不是一定要被繩之以法約在以同樣的方式，所有其他共倒塌的鋼框架建築物歷來都帶來了：前種植了炸藥，在程序被稱為控制下進行拆卸。 The evidence of this is corroborated by Professor Steven Jones and Gordon Ross.有關這方面的證據佐證教授史蒂文瓊斯和戈登羅斯。 The narrative then attempts to account for what happened to flight 93.敘事，然後試圖在賬戶所發生的飛行93 。 The official story does not square with the absence of debris at the alleged site.官方的故事並不為正方形，沒有碎片，據稱現場。 The film then shows how various versions of events were created and then discarded by the Bush Administration.電影則顯示了如何利用各種版本的事件創造了，然後丟棄的布什政府。

The narrative then attempts to account for what happened to flight 93.敘事，然後試圖在賬戶所發生的飛行93 。 The official story does not square with the absence of debris at the alleged site.官方的故事並不為正方形，沒有碎片，據稱現場。 The film then shows how various versions of events were created and then discarded by the Bush Administration to explain away what happened.電影則顯示了如何利用各種版本的事件創造了，然後再拋棄布什政府闡釋了什麼事。

The film’s investigation into the collapse of WTC 7 is perhaps the most perplexing in the whole 9/11 story.電影的調查，倒塌的世貿中心7日也許是最令人費解的，在整個9 / 11故事。 From the failure to provide an official explanation, to the miraculous announcement of the collapse of the building 30 minutes before it happened by BBC TV, Loose Change Final Cut demonstrates that whatever did happen to that building was nothing to do with hijacked planes and small fires.從沒有提供官方的解釋，以奇蹟般的公佈倒塌的大樓前的30分鐘，正好是由英國廣播公司電視，鬆散變化的Final Cut表明，無論曾發生該大廈是完全與劫持飛機和小火。 According to demolition expert Danny Jowenko, its destruction can only be accounted for by ‘controlled demolition’.據拆卸專家丹尼jowenko ，其銷毀，只能按'控制拆遷' 。

The penultimate segment examines the work of the 9/11 commission.倒數第二部分的審查工作， 9 / 11委員會。 How it was staffed by Bush Insiders who had every reason to ignore testimony that didn’t support the official story, how it failed to give victims families the opportunity to question witnesses, and how it failed to put George Bush on the stand on oath in public.它是怎麼配備布什有業內人士有理由忽視的證詞中說，不支持官方的故事，它如何沒有給予受害者家屬機會盤問證人，以及它如何未能付諸表決，布什就站在宣誓公眾。 He testified in secret, there was no transcription of his answers offered, all notes were subject to White House review, and Dick Cheney was with him to make sure he kept to the agreed script.他的證詞在秘密時，並沒有轉錄他的答案，都說明受白宮審查，而切尼是他，以確保他保持在商定的腳本。

To conclude, Loose Change Final Cut, asks whether on the basis of the evidence presented, whether 19 Arab hijackers were the sole perpetrators of the most significant terrorist attack in history or have we been lied to by a corrupt government and the massmedia?總括來說，鬆散變化的Final Cut ，詢問是否在此基礎上的證據，無論是19個阿拉伯劫機者分別為唯一兇手的最重大的恐怖襲擊歷史的時候，或者我們是否說謊，以一個腐敗的政府和大眾傳媒？

The film then shows exactly what has happened post 9/11電影則表明，他們正是這樣做後9 / 11

– two invasions, one of which was based upon a lie, the suspension of Habeus Corpus, the 13th Century act preventing the state from unlawfully imprisoning people without going in front of a judge, the creation of the culture of fear, the bankrupting of the American nation. -兩個入侵，其中一個是基於一個謊言，中止人身保護令，在1 3世紀的行為，防止國家從非法監禁的人，去了一位法官面前，創造文化的恐懼，破產的美利堅民族。

We end with a call to action asking people to demand a new truly independent investigation into 9/11.我們在結尾加上一個行動呼籲要求人們需求的一個新的真正的獨立調查，到9 / 11 。

Comment on 'The History of the Loose Change Phenomenon' : 評論'的歷史鬆散變化現象' ：

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Related News: 相關新聞：