The History of the Loose Change Phenomenon历史上的松散变化现象

Tim Sparke添sparke

Introduction导言

9/11 has clearly been the most important event of the 21st century, providing the basis for the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and many other dimensions of the “war on terror.” There is, accordingly, no more important question than whether the official account of 9/11 is true. 9 / 11已显然最重要的事件是21世纪，提供了依据，为美国入侵阿富汗及伊拉克和其他许多方面的"反恐战争" ，有争论，因此，没有更重要的问题，比否官方帐户9 / 11是真实的。 The main purpose of the “Loose Change” series of films is to explore various unanswered questions about 9/11 - questions that, by virtue of being unanswered by any official body, raise doubts about the truth of the official account.主要目的是"松散的变化"的系列电影，是为了探讨各种悬而未决的问题约9 / 11 -问题，凭借正在解答任何官方机构，使人们怀疑关于真理的正式户口。

Background To Loose Change Final Cut背景松散变化的Final Cut

“Loose Change I” and “Loose Change II” have been seen by millions, online, on TV and on DVD. "松散改变我"和"松散变化二" ，已被数百万，在网上，在电视上和DVD上。 In the words of Vanity Fair ‘Loose Change 2 is the world’s first internet blockbuster, and if it were released theatrically would pack out Movie Houses’.在换句话说名利场'松散变动2是世界上第一个在互联网上一鸣惊人的，如果它被释放戏剧将包出电影之家' 。

Over 40 countries broadcast Loose Change 2 in 2006 and an estimated 50 million people have now downloaded the film online.Given this unprecedented interest in the subject and clear demand amongst the world community, we have decided to produce Loose Change: Final Cut for online pay per view and theatrical release in 2007.超过40个国家播出松散变动2 ，在2006年估计有50万人，现在已经下载电影online.given这个前所未有的兴趣，并明确要求，其中包括世界社会，我们决定生产松散变化：最后削减为在线支付每个版块及舞台释放在2007年。

By the very nature of this type of investigative film-making, flaws in the narrative become apparent when new information and new footage becomes available.由很自然的这种类型的调查，电影，缺点在叙事显现的时候，新的信息和新画面变得可用。 By virtue of overcoming those flaws and incorporating this new material, “Loose Change: Final Cut” is significantly different from, and better than, the earlier versions incorporating 80% new material, and amazing new evidence, checked for accuracy by Dr David Ray Griffin the foremost 9/11 academic.凭借克服这些缺点，并把这种新的物质" ，松散的变化：的Final Cut " ，是显着性差异，并优于，更早的版本，把百分之八十的新材料，并获得惊人的新证据，并追查其准确性，由李国宝射线格里芬首要9 / 11学业。

Because of this, the film will thereby attract the millions who have seen Loose Change I and II as well as a new audience.正因为如此，电影，因而将吸引几百万人看到了松散变化I和II ，以及作为一个新的听众。 LC: Final Cut is the authoritative 9/11 movie, a genre busting critical success which will re-define the power and the importance of investigative documentary – a story of the Emperor’s New Clothes for the 21st Century.立法会：最后的削减是该权威人士9 / 11的电影，一个流派破坏关键的成功，将重新界定权力和重要性侦查纪录片-记皇帝的新衣，为二十一世纪。

It will alter the way in which mankind views the concept of democratic accountability, and questions the concepts of right and wrong, truth and fiction.它会改变方式，在人类意见的概念，民主问责制，并质疑是非观念，真理与谎言。

Loose Change: Final Cut is the most explosive, and most important, political film of the decade.松散的变化：最终削减，是最具爆炸性的，而且最重要的政治电影的十年。 Delivered in a contemporary accessible style, set to a rhythmic dynamic sound track and using the latest graphics technology, its mission is to prove that the official story of 9/11 cannot be true.发表在当代样式，设置一个节奏动态，健康的轨道，并使用最新的图形技术相结合，它的任务是要证明官方的故事9 / 11是不正确的。

Narrative叙事

The film is broken into segments:电影是打破分割成片断：

• Pre 9/11 investigations into the activities of the alleged hijackers by the FBI. • 前9 / 11调查，将活动所指称劫机者由联邦调查局。

• The Pentagon attack • 五角大楼攻击

• The collapses of WTC 1 and 2 • 坍塌的世贸中心1和2

• What happened to Flight 93. •有什么事要飞行93 。

• The collapse of WTC 7. • 倒塌的世贸中心7 。

• The 9/11 Commission: What it failed to report. • 9 / 11委员会：它没有报告。

• Does the evidence suggest we have been hoaxed? • 没有证据表明，我们一直hoaxed ？

The opening segment begins news reports, provided by main stream media, the hijackers were trained at US Military Institutions and that some of the hijackers were still alive after 9/11.开幕式开始，部分新闻报道中，所提供的主要流媒体，劫机者人员进行了培训，美国军事院校和一些劫机犯还活着之后， 9 / 11 。 It then progresses into the ‘Able Danger’ hearings, which contradict the official version of events concerning surveillance of Mohamed Atta and others, and to mainstream reports that the alleged hijackers had received training at US military bases.然后进步到'能危险'听证会，这违背了官方版本的事件监视穆罕默德阿塔等，并以主流报道说，据称劫机者接受了培训，在驻日美军基地。

The film then examines the evidence that the US government had planned extensively for the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon despite vigorous denials of such activity and even sent FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) to the WTC site the night before 9/11.电影，然后探讨了证据表示，美国政府曾计划广泛用于袭击世贸中心和五角大楼，尽管作出了有力的否认这种活动，甚至派遣联邦紧急措施（联邦紧急管理机构） ，向世台会现场的前一天晚上9 / 11 。

The segment on the Pentagon provides visual, testimonial, and commonsense evidence showing the extremely unlikelihood of the official account, according to which the Pentagon was struck by AA 77 (a Boeing 757) under the control of al-Qaeda hijacker Hani Hanjour (who was known as a terrible pilot).该段对五角大楼提供视觉，取证，并根据常理证据显示，极不大可能正式户口，按照该计划，五角大楼留下深刻机管局77 （波音757 ）控制下的盖达组织劫机犯哈尼族中写道（当时众所周知，作为一个可怕的飞行员） 。 This segment will reveal Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta’s explosive testimony, before the 9/11 Commission, suggesting that Vice-President Cheney had issued a “stand-down” order regarding an aircraft approaching Washington DC shortly before the Pentagon was struck.这部分将揭示运输部长峰田的爆炸性的证词，前9 / 11委员会，暗示副总统切尼曾发出一份"立场下， "订单关于飞机逼近华盛顿不久之前，五角大楼留下深刻。

The World Trade Centre segment provides various types of evidence - visual, testimonial, and scientific - against the official theory, which states that the collapses of WTC 1, and 2 were caused by externally caused damage plus fire.世界贸易中心的部分提供了各种种类的证据-视觉，取证和科学-对官方理论，其中指出，倒塌的世贸中心1日和2因对外造成了损害加火。 This evidence shows that these collapses must instead have been brought about in the same way that all other total collapses of steel-frame buildings have historically been brought about: by pre-planted explosives in the procedure known as controlled demolition.这一证据表明，这些倒塌，而不是一定要被绳之以法约在以同样的方式，所有其他共倒塌的钢框架建筑物历来都带来了：前种植了炸药，在程序被称为控制下进行拆卸。 The evidence of this is corroborated by Professor Steven Jones and Gordon Ross.有关这方面的证据佐证教授史蒂文琼斯和戈登罗斯。 The narrative then attempts to account for what happened to flight 93.叙事，然后试图在账户所发生的飞行93 。 The official story does not square with the absence of debris at the alleged site.官方的故事并不为正方形，没有碎片，据称现场。 The film then shows how various versions of events were created and then discarded by the Bush Administration.电影则显示了如何利用各种版本的事件创造了，然后丢弃的布什政府。

The narrative then attempts to account for what happened to flight 93.叙事，然后试图在账户所发生的飞行93 。 The official story does not square with the absence of debris at the alleged site.官方的故事并不为正方形，没有碎片，据称现场。 The film then shows how various versions of events were created and then discarded by the Bush Administration to explain away what happened.电影则显示了如何利用各种版本的事件创造了，然后再抛弃布什政府阐释了什么事。

The film’s investigation into the collapse of WTC 7 is perhaps the most perplexing in the whole 9/11 story.电影的调查，倒塌的世贸中心7日也许是最令人费解的，在整个9 / 11故事。 From the failure to provide an official explanation, to the miraculous announcement of the collapse of the building 30 minutes before it happened by BBC TV, Loose Change Final Cut demonstrates that whatever did happen to that building was nothing to do with hijacked planes and small fires.从没有提供官方的解释，以奇迹般的公布倒塌的大楼前的30分钟，正好是由英国广播公司电视，松散变化的Final Cut表明，无论曾发生该大厦是完全与劫持飞机和小火。 According to demolition expert Danny Jowenko, its destruction can only be accounted for by ‘controlled demolition’.据拆卸专家丹尼jowenko ，其销毁，只能按'控制拆迁' 。

The penultimate segment examines the work of the 9/11 commission.倒数第二部分的审查工作， 9 / 11委员会。 How it was staffed by Bush Insiders who had every reason to ignore testimony that didn’t support the official story, how it failed to give victims families the opportunity to question witnesses, and how it failed to put George Bush on the stand on oath in public.它是怎么配备布什有业内人士有理由忽视的证词中说，不支持官方的故事，它如何没有给予受害者家属机会盘问证人，以及它如何未能付诸表决，布什就站在宣誓公众。 He testified in secret, there was no transcription of his answers offered, all notes were subject to White House review, and Dick Cheney was with him to make sure he kept to the agreed script.他的证词在秘密时，并没有转录他的答案，都说明受白宫审查，而切尼是他，以确保他保持在商定的脚本。

To conclude, Loose Change Final Cut, asks whether on the basis of the evidence presented, whether 19 Arab hijackers were the sole perpetrators of the most significant terrorist attack in history or have we been lied to by a corrupt government and the massmedia?总括来说，松散变化的Final Cut ，询问是否在此基础上的证据，无论是19个阿拉伯劫机者分别为唯一凶手的最重大的恐怖袭击历史的时候，或者我们是否说谎，以一个腐败的政府和大众传媒？

The film then shows exactly what has happened post 9/11电影则表明，他们正是这样做后9 / 11

– two invasions, one of which was based upon a lie, the suspension of Habeus Corpus, the 13th Century act preventing the state from unlawfully imprisoning people without going in front of a judge, the creation of the culture of fear, the bankrupting of the American nation. -两个入侵，其中一个是基于一个谎言，中止人身保护令，在1 3世纪的行为，防止国家从非法监禁的人，去了一位法官面前，创造文化的恐惧，破产的美利坚民族。

We end with a call to action asking people to demand a new truly independent investigation into 9/11.我们在结尾加上一个行动呼吁要求人们需求的一个新的真正的独立调查，到9 / 11 。

Comment on 'The History of the Loose Change Phenomenon' : 评论'的历史松散变化现象' ：

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Related News: 相关新闻：