Περισσότερη εξαπάτηση BBC: Η εξαπάτηση 9/11 που δεν ελειτούργησε αρκετά
Nearly eight weeks later, after repeated requests for clarification (from myself and others) had been ignored, I posted a compendium of the coverage Seffen and his paper had received, noting that it had been largely uncritical but remarkably sparse.
3) November 5, 2007:
Seffen’s Folly: Attempted 9/11 Hoax By Cambridge And The BBC Was A Failure
The following day I noted some of the many unanswered questions and documented a series of requests for clarification which had been ignored by Dr. Seffen and by Dr. Ross Corotis, the editor of the JEM.
4) November 6, 2007:
Where’s The Paper? Did The BBC And A Cambridge Don Commit Fraud To Cover Up Mass Murder?
Several readers of the latter two stories joined in the effort to obtain further information. Some of them had academic credentials, and their requests stirred Dr. Corotis to action.
Two days later, I was pleased to report on a message from the ASCE, saying that according to their records, Dr. Seffen’s paper is scheduled for publication in the February 2008 JEM.
5) November 8, 2007:
WTC ‘Collapse’ Research Cited In September Is Scheduled To Be Published In February
This was good news for two reasons. It marked the first public commitment from the ASCE to publish the paper. And it provided confirmation of the fact that the paper had not been published when it was cited (and referred to as published) by the BBC and others.
Then another reader — one with even more impressive credentials — started digging in a different place, and unearthed a copy of the paper itself.
The following day I posted the first few pages of Seffen’s paper (in HTML) on my website
6) November 9, 2007:
Introducing Keith Seffen’s “Progressive Collapse Of The WTC: A Simple Analysis”
I also provided a link to the entire paper (a small PDF file).
http://winterpatriot.pbwiki.com/f/seffen_simple_analysis.pdf
True to the description provided by the press release, the paper turned out to be worthless as science, but not entirely meaningless.
7) November 11, 2007:
Keep Your Hats On: Keith Seffen’s “Mathematical Model Of The WTC Collapse” Is Incoherent, Inappropriate, And Almost Meaningless
Via the fantastic Winter Patriot site, make sure you add them to your bookmarks
See More:BBC False FlagHave Your Say: More BBC Deceit: The 9/11 Hoax That Didn’t Quite Work
Please note, only selected comments will be published.
Or discuss this report in our our new forums
One Response to “More BBC Deceit: The 9/11 Hoax That Didn’t Quite Work”
-
pingback:
Posted: Feb 5th, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Link to this
Economic Controller
Free Newsletter
Loading ...Related News
- Cambridge University Twin Towers Theory Debunked
- 9/11: Irresponsible Science - POP MEC & Dr Seffen
- 9/11 Research Reflects Badly On Cambridge University
- 9/11 Theory Destroyed By Unsung Internet Heroes
- Toilet-paper dispenser is stingy with the sheets
Email This Page To A Friend
Latest Headlines
- The Pentagon vs. America
- Data fear haunts ID card scheme
- Pentagon Targeted Iran for Regime Change after 9/11
- Gov set to defy its own experts and upgrade cannabis
- Nuns are turned away from Indiana polls
- FBI agents raid office protecting whistleblowers
- ‘Torture memo’ author, former attorney general, to testify
- The Surveillance Society Does Not Work
- Government can’t be trusted with our personal information
- ID-cards are ‘theft’ of our civil liberties
More Breaking News
Archive
[…] academic, Dr. Keith Seffen of the University of Cambridge, published a new mathematical analysis of the collapse of the World Trade Centre – however the paper contains several ridiculous […]