By Mick Meaney由米克meaney
RINF Alternative News rinf另类新闻

A British scientist and member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice  , John A. Blacker MSc IMI (Physical Systems), is planning to sue the BBC for mass public deception via their “9/11: The Conspiracy Files” programme,英国科学家和会员的学者，为9 / 11真理与正义，约翰甲黑海安IMI公司（物理系统） ，也正计划控告英国广播公司，为大众行骗经由其" 9 / 11 ：阴谋档案"的方案， RINF Alternative News rinf另类新闻 can reveal.可以透露。

The programme which aired on 18 February, 2007, promised to offer a thorough examination of the events of 9/11 and answer many of the questions posed by the 9/11 Truth Movement.该节目播出07年2月18日，承诺要提供一个彻底检查的事件， 9 / 11 ，并回答许多问题所造成9 / 11真理运动。

However, the hour long programme failed to investigate the tough questions and ignored hard evidence that points towards a deeper conspiracy, while presenting an unfair and unbalanced view of 9/11 research.然而，一小时长的节目没有调查尖锐问题，而忽视证据指向更深的阴谋，而呈现一种不公平和不平衡的看法9 / 11研究。

Scientist and member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, John A. Blacker, is taking action against this portrayal on the grounds of ‘Total Public Deception’.科学家和会员的学者，为9 / 11真理与正义，约翰甲黑，是采取行动对付这种写照，所持理由的'占总公共欺骗' 。

In ongoing correspondence with the BBC, Mr. Blacker is requesting an official apology and a second programme to be produced in order to ‘set the record straight’.在正在进行的函授与BBC的先生，黑，是要求正式道歉和第二个方案，将制作以'创造新纪录直' 。

Mr Blacker is preparing to take legal action against the BBC and is currently gathering evidence.问黑正准备采取法律行动， BBC和目前正在搜集证据。

Earlier this month, ex MI5 whistleblower, David Shayler, along with Adrian Connock, producer of Mind the Gap which exposed the false flag terrorism in London on 7/7/05, released an本月初，前的MI5举报人，戴维沙耶尔，随着阿德里安connock ，制片人的心目中的差距，这暴露了虚假国旗恐怖主义在伦敦7/7/05 ，释放了 extensive video rebuttal广泛的视频反驳 destroying the BBC’s attempt to discredit scientific evidence and eyewitness reports.摧毁了英国广播公司的企图抹黑科学证据和目击者的报告。

Speaking to发言 RINF rinf , Mr. Blacker said: “The BBC is being sued for lying to viewers and a formal apology and a new film correcting the scandalous misinformation is needed.先生，黑说： "英国广播公司是被起诉因说谎观众和正式道歉和一个新的电影纠正造谣中伤误报是需要的。

“How can 80+ strongest, undamaged and heaviest bottom floors offer only 0.78 seconds of resistance between them - yet were designed and built to withstand 3 times working load and have “indestructible cores” when new. "怎么能80 +最强，完好无损的重底部楼层只提供0.78秒抵抗它们之间的-但是，设计和兴建，经受3倍的工作负荷，并具有"坚不可摧芯"的时候，新的。 This is without considering air resistance and any other slowing effect.这是没有考虑到空气阻力及其他任何减缓的影响。

“This simple maths proves 911 was a demolition,” he said. "这个简单的数学证明911是一个拆迁， "他说。

In Mr. Blacker’s most recent letter to the BBC he provides scientific evidence to support his theory of a controlled demolition.在先生黑的，最近写信给英国广播公司，他提供了科学证据，以支持他的理论的控制下进行拆卸。

Here is the letter in full:这里是信中充分证明：

Pre action for damages without prejudice 会前，要求赔偿无偏见

Your ref: CT/0700108a你的档号： ct/0700108a

RE: 911 The Conspiracy files Documentary - BBC - Total Public Deception. 回复： 911阴谋的档案文献-英国广播公司-共计公众欺骗。

Dear Secretary Bruce Vander,亲爱局长布鲁斯vander ，

Thank you for your letter dated 4 June 2007 from Colin Tregear.谢谢你的来信日期为2007年6月4日，由科林tregear 。

I do indeed intend to take this matter to the next level for the following reasons and I want at least an apology if not a second program setting the record straight and exposing the true 911 facts as opposed to the official government lies.我的的确确打算借这件事到下一级出于以下原因，我想至少道歉，如果没有第二个计划设置记录和揭露真相911事实作为反对政府官方的谎言。

I fully accept the Conspiracy files program was only 59 minutes long, so why if time was so short, was copious time spent exploring the work of a weird science fiction writer who was not even there on 911 - as opposed to evaluating the merits of the recorded Physics Evidence (FACTS) of which are the core concerns of the “Government account” sceptics such as myself?我完全接受阴谋档节目只有59分钟，那么，为什么如果时间是如此短暂的，是大量的时间花在探索工作，一个怪异的科幻小说作家，甚至不是有关于911 -作为反对评价优劣的记录的物理证据（事实） ，其中正在关注的核心问题， "政府帐户"的怀疑论者像我这样的吗？

Below are the science facts, which clearly, conclusively, prove that 911 was a Deliberate Controlled Demolition.下面是科学事实，而这点显然，得出结论，证明了911是一种故意的控制下进行拆卸。

Only a controlled demolition can collapse a 3 times working load, 47 massive steal core column steel framed building at freefall speed.只有控制拆迁可以崩溃了3次工作负荷， 47个庞大的偷芯柱钢骨架大楼在freefall速度。

It is physically impossible for the strongest, heaviest and (3 times working design load) bottom 80 floors to offer near zero resistance to the falling floors except when there is a controlled demolition.它是身体不可能最强，最重，及（ 3次工作设计荷载）底部的80层，以提供接近零阻力下降，除楼层时，有一个控制拆迁。 Period!期间！

How on earth can you claim the Conspiracy Files Documentary had anything to do with detail or forensic examination of the evidence if you totally avoided all of the Physics à which is in itself helping to fuel the many “conspiracy theories” - YET not once was there even a whiff of even any first hand accounts from key witnesses such as William Rodriguez (The Last Man Out) or any of the other first hand witnesses on 911?如何在地球上你能索赔阴谋的档案文献都没有详细或鉴证证据，如果你完全避免所有的物理à这本身就是帮助推动了许多"阴谋论" -而不是曾经有即使是喷气的，甚至有第一手的户口从关键证人如威廉罗德里格斯（最后一个男子出来） ，或任何其他的第一手目击者对911吗？

William Rodriguez states quite categorically in an interview with the BBC - BOMBS went off even before the first plane hit and continued to be set off - yet you spent ages interviewing 2 ^nd & 3 ^rd hand witnesses such as a distressed grieving sister & some weird science fiction writer who were simply not present on 911.威廉罗德里格斯国相当明确，在接受采访时，与英国广播公司-炸弹进行了一次甚至前第一架飞机撞击而继续被定小康-但你们用年龄面试的第2次与^第 3次手^证人如一个忧伤悲痛的妹妹及一些怪异科学科幻作家的人，根本不在场，就911 。

Caption above: William Rodriguez states quite categorically in an interview with the BBC – A large BOMB went off even before the first plane hit and took out the sub basement level 002. 字幕以上：威廉罗德里格斯国相当明确，在接受采访时，与英国广播公司-大经历过原子弹爆炸的，甚至前第一架飞机击中并拿出小组地下室水平0 02。

If the BBC had been concentrating properly on detail and forensic examination as you claim to me in your letter then you would not have omitted the following key 13 items : -如果英国广播公司已被集中妥善细节和法医检验，因为你们称我，你在信中，然后你也不会漏了以下13个重点项目 ： -

1 No mention of US government history of total deceit, using Standown orders and fake events as pretexts for war, in which on one occasion alone over 50,000 US troops and 1,000,000 + Vietcong died during the following Vietnam war. 1没有提及美国政府在历史上的总欺骗手段，用standown订单和打假事件为借口，战争，其中仅一次就超过50000名美军士兵和1000000 +越共死亡，在随后的越南战争。

2 No mention of published US government documents which set out how to invade Cuba using a pretext of fake hijacked planes, terrorist attacks on Americans, deliberate horrific murder of US civilians so as to cause the invasion of Cuba hence start nuclear war WW3. (Operation Northwoods) 2不提出版的美国政府文件，其中列出如何入侵古巴使用的借口假冒劫持飞机，恐怖袭击对美国人来说，可怕的蓄意谋杀的美国民众，从而造成入侵古巴，因此开始核战争ww3 。 （操作northwoods ）

3 No interviews with key high witnesses such as police officers, fire fighters or National 911 hero William Rodriguez (Last Man Out) and other key 911 event witnesses. 3不约谈关键证人高，如警务人员，消防战士或全国911英雄威廉罗德里格斯（最后一名出）及其他重要911事件的证人。 (See your own BBC archive) No mention of key witness testimony, radio traffic, and other key video evidence, which clearly demonstrates many explosions from within the twin towers prior to planes hitting or collapse. （见你自己的英国广播公司档案）没有提及的关键证人证言，书证，电台的交通，以及其他关键视频的证据，这清楚地表明了许多爆炸事件，从双子星大楼之前，飞机击中或崩溃。

4 No mention that all three buildings fell at freefall speed and that no steel framed building had ever collapsed due to fires prior or since 911. 4没有提到这三个建筑物跌幅freefall速度并没有钢骨架大楼已倒塌，以往因火灾之前或之后911 。 Yet many fires were much hotter and much longer.然而，许多火灾都是白热化和更长的时间。 You made no attempt what so ever to explain why all 3 buildings fell at freefall speed - You simply deliberately avoided the Physics.你没有尝试什么，所以任何时候都解释为什么所有3栋跌幅freefall速度-你简单地刻意回避物理。

5 No mention of the omission of many high witness testimonies from the 911 commission’s final report. No mention of the interpreter who testified she had translated documents which gave key specific 911 details to the authorities. 5 不提遗漏许多高证人证言，从911委员会的最后报告中，没有提的口译员作证说，她已翻译文件提供了重要的具体细节911向当局。 No mention that Mossad, UK, French and other intelligence agencies had warned the US weeks prior of immanent attack by Arab terrorists using Jumbos to launch at buildings – yet airport security was not stepped up. You failed to mention building 007 was completely omitted from the official 911 Commission’s final report.并没有提及这摩萨德，英国，法国和其他情报机构曾警告美国周之前的内在攻击阿拉伯恐怖分子利用jumbos推出在建筑物-然而，机场的安全是没有加强，你没有提到建设0 07被完全省略，从官方911委员会的最后报告。

6 No mention that Bush, Rumsfeld & Condi lied claiming they had no idea or even suspicion terrorist would ever use planes as terrorist weapons. 6没有提及布什，拉姆斯菲尔德＆条件说谎，声称他们没有想到，甚至怀疑恐怖分子会利用飞机作为恐怖武器。 (Yet were doing a terrorist/plane exercise on the morning of 911) （但这样做恐怖/平面演习于当天上午911 ）

7 No mention that Bush, “the Commander in Chief” when told: - 7没有提及布什， "总指挥官" ，当被告知： -

“America is under Attack” "美国是受到攻击"

Kept on reading a stupid goat story à this in itself is a total dereliction of duty hence a treasonable offence. Its worse than if an on duty paramedic answers a distress call that children have just been mowed over by a wagon - then calmly finishes their morning tea & toast. Hello!保持阅读是一种愚蠢的山羊的故事à这本身是一个总失职的，因此，叛逆罪，其差，如果当值辅助答案求救讯号，即儿童刚mowed由一名旅行车-然后心平气和地完成自己的早晨茶＆致祝酒辞。您好！

8 No mention the Pentagon had missile batteries which should shoot down any aircraft that is unauthorised entering its airspace, and that both the outer and inner systems failed to activate – yet you interviewed the actual transport plane pilot who knew full well the Pentagon was missile armed and mentioned nothing of this when referring to what he claimed he observed. 8日没有提及五角大楼曾将导弹发射架，其中应击落任何飞机是未经批准进入其领空的，因为，无论是内，外系统未能启动-但你们采访了实际的运输机飞行员，他们完全知道五角大楼导弹武装，并没有提及这个当谈到他所声称的，他观察到。

9 No mention that two planes were reported by two independent sources as landing at Cleveland Hopkins Airport due to two separate bomb threats , not just one, and that flight 93 was one of those reported to have landed by locals. 九不提这两架飞机分别报由两个独立的消息来源降落在克利夫兰霍普金斯机场由于两个独立的炸弹威胁 ，不只是一个，以及飞行93 ，是其中一人据报已降落，由本地人。

10 A 757 simply cannot fly at ground level due to what is known as “Ground Effect”. 10 757个，根本不能飞行，地面水平，由于什么是被称为"地面效应" 。 You show a so called independent computer animator who suggests that jet fuel caused most of the damage at the Pentagon, yet failed to mention his animation omitted the two 9 ft, 6 tonne engines from the animation and also the clear fact his animation totally contradicts photographs of the Pentagon prior to collapse. Hello! What sort of BBC Deceit is that? Also, his animation failed to account for the fact 6 reinforced concrete walls were penetrated à they omitted the 6 reinforced walls completely.你查看一个所谓独立的电脑动画师，他们认为，喷气燃料所造成的损害大多是在五角大楼，但没有提及他的动画省略了两个9英尺， 6吨重的引擎 ，从动画，也是事实清楚他的动画完全是自相矛盾的照片对五角大楼之前崩溃。您好，是什么样的英国广播公司欺骗，是吗？此外，他的动画未能交代事实六日钢筋混凝土墙壁被侵入 à他们遗漏了600钢筋墙完全。 Indeed, the official image of the hole in the inner wall of the C block shows this animation to be total and utter fiction, yet the BBC gave it raving credibility. Question: Why did you fail to mention these key contradictions? Answer: Because you were trying to make the truth movement & its members including myself look stupid, fruitcake and unworthy of measured consideration and the BBC was deliberately deceiving the British Public.事实上，官方的形象，该洞内壁的C座显示此动画，以彻底，完全虚构的，但英国广播公司后来却狂言的公信力。问：你为什么不提这些关键的矛盾吗？答：因为你试图使真理运动＆其成员包括我自己看傻， fruitcake和不可取的测量考虑和BBC是蓄意欺骗英国公众。 Period.期。

11 3 floors only were pancaked, yet your film suggested the discredited 60 seconds pancake theory had validity when in fact it has already been discredited as totally implausible. 3月11日地板不但pancaked ，但你的电影，建议抹黑60秒煎饼理论曾效力的时候，其实它已经名声扫地，因为完全implausible 。 You deceived the public into thinking such implausible official theory stacked up and made any sense – yet the animation failed to account for the actual NIST reported and videoed 10 seconds freefall speeds and also the utter collapse of all building cores to DUST. In other words, this was a deliberate clear case of total deception on your part. Your film was totally deceitfully & factually false.你欺骗了公众，使他们认为这种implausible官方理论堆叠起来，并取得了任何意义-但是动画未能占实际N IST的报告和录像1 0秒f reefall速度，也完全崩溃，所有建筑物的核心，以粉尘。换句话说，这是一种故意明显的情况下，共诈骗对你的一部分，你的电影，完全是骗取＆与事实是假的。

12 Re flight 93: Your film claimed it was alleged by “Conspiracy Theorists” to be an 8-mile debris field, but when you investigated the claim it turned out to be about 8 miles by road but only 1 mile as the crow flies. This is yet further total, absolute deceit on your part. Flight 93 had, according to local official police and fire/rescue sources who actually did the search à an 8-mile debris field. 12日重新飞行93 ：你的电影声称，据指称， "阴谋论"是一个八英里的碎片领域的，但是当你进行调查，声称它最终被证明约8公里的道路，但只有1英里，因为乌鸦苍蝇。这又是进一步共有的，绝对的欺骗，对你的一部分。飞行了93个，据当地官方，警方及消防/救援消息来源究竟是谁没有搜索à 8英里的碎片领域。

13 Your film clearly states: “the evidence points to a conspiracy after 911 - not before. You stated, “The other 911 conspiracy theories are just that, theories, the evidence does not support them”. This is blatantly a false misleading statement. Even your own report stated that Government agents attempted to action protection for the US prior to 911. Indeed, failing to act on intelligence is a treasonable offence. 13你的电影明确规定： "证据指向一个阴谋后， 911 -而非在此之前，你说， "其他9 11阴谋论只是理论，证据并不支持他们" ，这是公然虚假误导性的声明。即使您自己的报告指出，政府代理人试图采取行动保护美国的前 911 。事实上，不采取行动的情报是一个叛逆罪。

Obviously you now need a second attempt to put the record straight seeing as you did not have enough time in the first 59 minutes. Why do you not improve your reputation and credibility as a stickler for “detail or forensic examination” of the evidence and actually do a second more in-depth documentary incorporating some or all of the omission of your other “detailed and forensic examination”?很显然，你现在需要第二个企图把记录看，因为你没有足够的时间在第一次59分钟，为什么你不改善你的名声和信誉作为一个斯蒂克勒"细节或鉴证"的证据和实际做了第二次更深入的纪录片，将部分或全部的遗漏，你的其他"详细和法医检验" ？

This time perhaps you could cover the real Physics and also interview actual first hand police and fire rescue officers - as not once did your previouse “detailed and forensic analysis” include any actual Physics or any such first hand witness accounts yet your journalist had spoken to said witnesses but deliberately chose to omit these reports from the final documentary.这个时候，或许你无法掩盖真实物理，也实际采访第一手警察和消防救援人员-作为一次也没有你的p reviouse"详细和法医分析" ，包括任何实际的物理或任何此类的第一手证词， 但你的记者进行了交谈目击者说，但故意略去这些报告，从最后的纪录片。

Can I once again point out that I am not a “Conspiracy theorist” – I am a Physicist proposing credible Physical Hypothesis based solely upon the Indisputable Physics facts, Maths & Physical Evidence.我可以再次指出的是，我不是一个"阴谋理论家" -我是一个物理学家提出可信的物理假说完全基于不争的事实，物理学，数学及物理证据。

I would very much like to be in your next film explaining why buildings simply cannot collapse at freefall without the use of explosives to destroy the foundations first. Better still, why not interview my senior Professor Steven Jones and he will no doubt explain it even better than I with my Physics Masters degree & Mechanical Engineering Qualifications. Indeed, pit us against the likes of your Popular Mechanics Crew in a 911 WWF style tag team punk out!我非常想在你的下一部电影解释为何建筑物，根本不能垮在freefall而不使用炸药摧毁基金会第一。更好的是，为什么不采访我的资深教授史蒂文琼斯和他将毫无疑问的解释，甚至更好比我与我的物理学硕士研究生，机械工程资格。事实上，坑我们对喜欢你的大众机械师船员在911世界自然基金会风格标签队朋克！

In your last attempt at obtaining the facts without even the whiff of any proof you let Popular Mechanics claim Building 007 was not a demolition, quote: -在你的最后一次努力，在获取事实，甚至没有喷气的任何证明你让大众机械师索赔建设007不是一个拆卸，报价： -

“ I understand why people might think that, uh rm, and I see what they are saying, but when you learn the facts about the way the building was built, and about the way that it supported itself and the damage that was done from the collapsing towers that proceeded it – the idea that it was a demolition just holds no water.” "我理解，为什么人们或许会认为，嗯马币，而且我看到什么，他们说，但是当你了解事实的方式建设，建成，并以什么方法，它支持自己的行为和损害，这是做了，从倒塌的塔接着它-的想法，这是一个刚刚拆除未掌握水" 。

I have a safe seafront villa in Baghdad with a bomb crater in the rear yard I will sell you real cheep if you are willing to buy such utter diatribe!我有一个安全的海滨别墅，在巴格达与一个炸弹弹坑，在后方堆场，我会卖给你真正cheep如果你愿意购买这种彻底的谩骂！

Both the above statements could not be further from the truth and you know it, notice how the Popular Mechanics guy never once mentions the piddly little fires in building 007 sexed up to be towering infernos by the media, or the alleged exploding gas tank as claimed by official sources for being the cause of collapse. More importantly - Also notice how Building 007 is not mentioned once in the “911 Commission Final Report” at all !无论上述言论可能不会再有偏离事实，你知道，通知如何大众机械师家伙从来没有一次提到piddly小火灾，在建设007添油加醋被高耸的地狱被媒体或被指控的爆炸气柜所宣称的那样官方消息来源为事业崩溃的边缘。更重要的-也预告，如何建设0 07没有提到曾经在" 9 11委员会最终报告"在各！

The omission of any mention of Building 007 is because it could be nothing other than controlled implosive demolition and they know so, so they deliberately ignore it . If you look at the very top of Building 007 as it starts to collapse you notice a crimp to the side of the penthouse, then the penthouse which is housing the air-conditioning units etc, collapses entirely, and only then does the rest of the building collapse at freefall speed onto its own footprint with the outer walls on top.遗漏任何提及大楼007 ，就是因为它可以以外的任何控制implosive拆迁，他们也知道，所以，所以他们就故意不理它 ，如果你在看那个很高层建筑007 ，因为它开始崩溃您发现有卷曲度，以一旁的顶层复式，然后复式是房屋空调机组等，完全坍塌，只有那么其余的建筑物倒塌，在freefall速度上自己的足迹与外墙上。 The fires and damage were over 20 floors below the penthouse, how could fire and lower level damage collapse the penthouse on the roof and not the floors in-between ? Hello!火灾和损坏均超过20层以下的复式单位， 怎么能防火和较低层次的损坏坍塌复式单位在屋顶上而不是在楼层之间 ？您好！

The dust cloud from the base of the building is caused because the basement is explosively blown and hence you see a large rising dust cloud of super heated pulverised concrete dust.尘云从该基地的建设，是造成的，因为地下室是爆炸性的吹，所以你看到一个大的上升尘埃云的超级激烈青山混凝土灰尘。 The building, despite its damage on one side from the fall of other building debris – falls straight down at freefall ending up filling the previously blown basement and with the outer walls pulled on top because the central column which caused the initial crimp folds the building inwards due to the lack of interior and basement structural support as the building accelerates to earth under only GRAVITY.建筑，尽管它损害的一方，从秋天的其他建筑物碎片-瀑布直跌在f reefall结束了填补先前吹地下室，并与外墙拉之上，因为中央纵队，导致最初的卷曲折叠建设闭关自守由于缺乏内部和地下室的支撑结构，为建设加速到地球下只有重力。

If Building 007 had fallen slower than freefall and toppled over there may have been the likelihood of fire or structural damage causing the failure.如果建设007跌至低于freefall和架子，有可能已被可能性火灾或结构性破坏，导致失败。 But, as with the twin towers, Building 007 fell at freefall onto its own footprint hence for this to happen the basement and lower floor supports have to be eliminated prior to the top collapsing – hence à timed video evidence alone supplies absolute categorical proof of a controlled and implosive deliberate demolition to building 007 and the twin towers on 911.但是，正如与双塔，建设007个属于freefall上自己的足迹，因此为了做到这一点的地下室和较低层的支持都将被淘汰之前，顶部塌陷-因此à 定时录像证据，仅用品绝对明确的证明一控制和implosive故意拆卸，以建设007和双塔就911 。 Of course the seismic data merely reinforces what the videos show.当然，地震数据只是强化了什么，影片显示。

Your Film did not show any of these points à hence is verging on Treasonous Media Deception which requires investigation; an apology to me as a viewer, and better still a new program encompassing all of the omissions of key evidence not shown in the first program.你的电影并没有显示任何这些点à因而是濒临叛逆媒体欺骗这需要调查;道歉，我是一个观众，更好地仍是一个新的计划，涵盖了所有的不作为关键证据未显示，在第一个纲领。

I ask that all of my previouse letters be sent to the new investigating department forthwith and for a formal investigation into my allegations of BBC journalist deception are investigated thoroughly and honestly.我要求我所有的previouse信件被发送到新的调查署随即并进行了正式调查，我的指控， BBC记者欺骗手段进行彻底调查，廉洁从政。

Kind regards亲切问候。

Mr JA Blacker MSc IMI (Physical Systems) (Lancaster England)问司法机构政务长黑海安IMI公司（物理系统） （兰卡斯特英格兰）

ENC: Physics paper describing “Demolition 911” and also the political deception.电子海图：物理文件的描述： "拆迁911 " ，也是政治欺骗。

Draft 6: JA Blacker MSc IMI (Physical Systems) (Lancaster England) June 07 草案六：司法机构政务长黑海安IMI公司（物理系统） （兰卡斯特英格兰） 6月7日

Physics Paper: The Alternative 911 Hypothesis Encompassing Witnessed, &/Or, Indisputable 物理试卷：另类911假说无所不包的见证，及/或争

Recorded Physical Evidence (facts). 记录实物证据（事实） 。

Key characteristics of 911 building demolition events: Straight Down Motion - Sudden Structural Failure - Buildings Collapsing At Free-Fall Speed - Total Collapse Of The Entire Load Bearing Cores - Many Examples of Cleanly Sliced Heavy Girder Steel Core Supports - Dust Clouds Containing Heavy Girders In Highly Energetic Horizontal Motion - Horizontal Ejections Of Heavy Girders And Pulverised Concrete Onto The Tops And Embedded Into Surrounding Buildings - Rescuers Reported And Seismic And Other Detectors Recorded Energy Dissipation Produced By Many Explosions (Recorded in real time by several different independent sources) In addition: Pools of molten Steel recorded over 1 week after collapse in the sub-basements (Refer to paper written by Physics Professor Steven Jones) Closer inspection of original video evidence shows heavy steel core columns turning to dust within seconds – question: - was a novel “StarWars type” energy directed beam weapon used in conjunction with explosives to undermine the integrity of the twin tower complex? 关键特征911房屋拆迁事件： 直上下动作-突然结构上的故障-建筑物倒塌，在自由降落速度-彻 底瓦 解整个承载内核-很多 例子 ，干净利落地切成沉重的大梁钢为核心的支援-尘土含 重， 在大梁高能水平运动 -横 向抛射重的大梁和青山混凝土上，车顶嵌入到周围建筑物- 救难 人员据报，地震和其他探测器记录耗能所产生的许多爆炸事件（记 录在实时性，由几个不同的独立消息来源），此外： 池钢水录得超过一周后崩溃，在分库 （指书面文件，由物理教授史蒂文琼斯）加强 检查，原来录像证据表明，重钢芯柱谈到粉尘数秒内-问题： -是一种新型的"为Starwars型"能源定向粒子束武器配合使用炸药完整性的前提下，在双塔复杂吗？ (Refer to work by Dr Judy Wood and Professor Jim Fetzer) To date the steel dust creating mechanism has not been formally identified & understood – however - Muslim Terrorists do not posses such advanced metal to dust creating technology – only the US military. （参照工作，由医生朱迪木材和教授吉姆费策尔） ，至目前为止，钢铁尘创造机制，并没有被正式确认与理解-然而-穆斯林恐怖分子不具备这种先进的金属粉尘制造技术-只有美国军队。

Physics Facts & Conclusions 物理事实与结论

All three buildings at ground zero in New York on 9/11, buildings 001, 002 & building 007 - came down at or about freefall speed onto their own footprint thereabouts, with outside walls on top. (Recorded) Free-fall speed of decent is caused because the supports for the lower floors are destroyed by metal shattering or cutting explosives and/or thermate - so that when the upper floors are brought down onto the lower floors, no resistance is encountered and therefore the entire building & its components accelerate towards the earth under the force of gravity at or about freefall speed. Only Controlled Demolitions can collapse steel framed buildings at free-fall speed and have all the above-recorded indisputable characteristics. As no plane hit building 7, yet that also came to ground in the late afternoon, this is yet further evidence of Controlled Implosive Demolition to building 7 - because had fuel tanks exploded inside building 7 as was the official claim, it would certainly not have collapsed on to its own footprint (more or less) with the outer walls on top. 所有这3座建筑物，在地面零9日在纽约/ 11 ，建筑物001 ， 002及007大楼-下来时，或约f reefall速度上自己的足迹t hereabouts，与外面的墙壁上。 （记录）的自由降落速度的体面原因是因为支持，为低层销毁金属粉碎或切割炸药和/或thermate -所以当楼上带落低层的，没有任何阻力遇到的，因此整个建筑及其组成部分，加快走向地球下力量的重心在或即将freefall速度， 只有控制拆迁可以崩溃钢骨架建筑在自由降落速度，并已在上述所有记录不争的特点，由于没有飞机撞击大楼7 ，然而，这也来到地面已故下午，这又是进一步的证据控制implosive拆卸，以建设7 -因为有燃料贮箱爆炸建设7正如这位官员声称，它肯定不会崩溃，就以自己的足迹（更多或更少） ，与外墙壁上。 Rather, exploding debris and fireballs would have been recorded on video shooting from the building, indeed only large clouds of dust from the basement area and then straight down motion of the entire structure in less than 7 seconds was in actual fact recorded. Summary - A careful physical analysis clearly demonstrates that, the fall of the buildings cannot be due to the aircraft impact and/or Jet fuel fire damage alone, or any pre-existing weakness in the 3 buildings. 相反，爆炸碎片和火球，将被记上了动态影像拍摄的，由建设，的确只有大云的灰尘从地下室面积，然后直线下跌议案的整个结构，在不到7秒，是在事实上已记录摘要 -仔细物理分析清楚地表明，秋天的建筑物，不能因飞机的影响和/或喷气燃料火灾损害，或有任何事先存在的弱点，在3栋。

Political Conclusion based upon the Recorded 911 Physical Evidence. 政治上的结论为基础，有记录的911实物证据。

The Physics evidence shows 911 was a clear case of deliberate plane crashes followed by lies, deceit & treason combined with Controlled Implosive Demolition as part of the United States & UK Government’s cover-up and total deceit. 物理证据表明， 911是一个明显的情况下故意飞机坠毁后，谎言，欺骗与叛国结合控制implosive拆卸的一部分，美国与英国政府隐瞒事件真相的行动和总欺骗。 Most Media have played their roll in said hideous regime type deception due to vested interests. A Muslim terrorist could not stop or confuse NORAD air defence so as to prevent NORAD fighter jet interception. 大多数媒体都发挥了他们的名册上说，丑恶政权类型行骗，由于既得利益者的利益。回教恐怖分子无法阻止或混淆与NORAD防空等，以防止与NORAD战斗机拦截。 A Muslim terrorist could not order the non-forensic removal and destruction of the 911 Plane/building wreckage evidence. 一个穆斯林恐怖分子不能命令非法医排除和销毁了911架飞机/建筑残骸的证据。 A Muslim terrorist could not remove and keep from the world public; Pentagon CCTV, Radio communications audio and other key video evidence, and also continue to do so some 5 years hence, including gagging orders of fire fighters, police and local officials - who claim many bombs went off within the 3 buildings (Seismic data does not lie). A Muslim terrorist could not, and did not stop the 911 Commission from investigating & answering 70% à 90% of the questions posed by the victims & their relatives or omitting umpteen high witness testimony from the 911 Commission’s “Final Report”, including omitting ALL references to the free fall speed destruction of Building 007. The real 911 “terrorists” did the steel evidence destruction to cover-up their false flag “ Inside job” treason of which gave a pretext for never ending “profitable war on terror” whilst reducing civil liberties & human rights. 一个穆斯林恐怖分子无法移除，并不断从世界公众;五角大楼闭路电视，无线电通讯录音和其他关键的视频证据，而且也将继续这样做，有的五年，因此，包括噎命令的消防员，警察和地方官员-谁索赔许多炸弹进行了一次内部的3栋（地震资料，不在于） 。回教恐怖主义不能，但并没有阻止911委员会调查＆回答七成à 90 ％的问题，所造成的受害者和他们的亲属或省略umpteen高证人证言，书证，从911委员会的"最终报告" ，包括省略所有提及到自由落体的速度毁坏建筑物007 。真正的911名"恐怖分子"曾钢证据销毁，以掩盖其虚假国旗"内就业"叛逆的进行了借口无休止的"有利可图反恐战争" ，而降低公民自由与人权。

Comment on 'STJ911 Scientist to Sue BBC for Public Deception' : 评论' stj911科学家控告英国广播公司欺骗公众' ：

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Related News: 相关新闻：