Open letter to Popular Mechanics - Prove your ludicrous 9/11 theories in public公開信向大眾機械師-證明您的可笑9 / 1 1理論在公共
Open letter to Popular Mechanics - Prove your ludicrous 9/11 theories in public 公開信向大眾機械師-證明您的可笑9 / 1 1理論在公共
By JA Blacker, Science Correspondent由司法機構政務長黑色，科學通訊員
RINF Alternative News rinf另類新聞
Editor James Meigs 編輯詹姆斯梅格斯 POPULAR MECHANICS 大眾機械師 | Mr JA Blacker MSc IMI 議員司法機構政務長黑色海安IMI的 Physical Systems 物理系統 LA2 6JJ 鑭6jj |
Saturday, 06 October 2007 週六， 2007年10月6日
Direct challenge to “Popular Mechanics” - Show us the Physics & Maths to back up your ludicrous & “physically impossible” 911 gravity collapse assertions - PHYSICAL SYSTEMS ( 直接挑戰“大眾機械師” -向我們顯示的物理及數學備份您的可笑＆ “身體是不可能的” 9 11重力崩潰的斷言-物理系統（
Here are the clear facts of the ~ 417 m tower destruction: 這裡是明確的事實〜四百十七米塔銷毀：
Physics Proof showing 9/11 was a Demolition. 物理證據顯示9 / 11是一個拆卸。
by JA Blacker MSc IMI (Physical Systems) ( 由司法機構政務長黑色海安 IMI的（物理系統） （
First we must identify what we already know as FACT: - 首先我們必須確定我們已經知道的事實： -
Twin towers 1 & 2 were 1,368 ft and 1362 ft respectively. 雙塔1 ＆ 2人1368英尺和一千三百六十二英尺分別。 Let us take the taller to be conservative. We know near the surface of the earth at sea level we can use g = 9.81 m/s 2 (metres per second per second), which is a scientifically accepted approximation. We know the towers fell in 10 Seconds due to the siesmic records and the copiouse video evidence. Secondly we must convert to SI units: g is measured in metres per second per second, d must be measured in metres, t in seconds. Distance fallen d = 416.97 Metres. g = 9.81 m/s 2 . t = 10 Seconds Let us find out how much time it would take to fall the actual hight 417 m in an ideal vacuum. We know that air resistance always slows a falling body, we will disregard air resistance & other slowing effects so as to keep the maths simple whilst at the same time giving a realistic accurate conservative value. 讓我們以高過於保守，我們知道，近地球表面在海平面上，我們可以用克 =九點八一米/秒2 （米每秒每秒） ，這是一個科學上可接受的逼近，我們知道，塔下跌在10秒由於該地震記錄和copiouse錄像證據。其次，我們必須轉換為SI單位： 克 ，是衡量在米每秒每秒署署長必須加以衡量，在米， 噸在秒。距離下降= 416.97米。 克 = 9.81米/秒2 。噸= 10秒，讓我們找出了多少時間，將採取下跌的實際高度417米在一個理想的真空，我們知道，空氣阻力始終減慢1自由落體運動，我們會不顧空氣阻力與其他放緩的影響，以免使數學簡單，而在同一時間內提供了現實的準確的保守價值。
————————————————————– ---------------------
It is physically impossible for the strongest, heaviest and (3 times working design load) bottom 80+ floors to offer near zero resistance to the falling floors except when there is a controlled demolition. 這是身體不可能最強，最重，及（ 3倍，工作設計荷載）底部的80 +樓層提供接近零，阻力下降，除樓層時，是有控制的拆卸。 Period! 期！
Popular mechanics claims in public literature that on 911 it is perfectly acceptable for a falling body to take, what is, the path of greatest resistance. 大眾機械師索賠在公共文獻中就911 ，這是完全可以接受的一個自由落體運動採取的是什麼，道路的最大阻力。
Physical Systems (Lancaster England) openly and publicly challenges “Popular Mechanics” magazine New York, to demonstrate one single experiment, which shows a falling body taking the path of greatest resistance (Reproducibly), or they remove and recant their ludicrous & physically impossible gravity destruction scenario from the public record. 物理系統（蘭開斯特英格蘭）公開，並公開挑戰“大眾機械師”雜誌在紐約，以顯示一個單一的實驗，這顯示了自由落體運動走的道路， 最大的阻力 （ reproducibly ） ，或他們刪除並收回他們的可笑與身體不可能的嚴重性銷毀的情況，從公開的紀錄。
If 6 months from the date of this formal public challenge (Saturday, 06 October 2007) “Popular Mechanics” Magazine can not reproducibly demonstrate a falling body taking the path of greatest resistance as a result of Gravity alone, then it is Ample evidence to everyone that the Popular Mechanics Magazine assertion that Gravity alone could destroy the twin towers and building 007 at near freefall speed IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE “Popular Myth” & deliberate “Popular Mechanics” DECEPTION or indeed honest misunderstanding Re the laws of Physics. 如果6個月，自公佈之日起，這正式公開挑戰（週六， 2007年10月6日） “大眾機械師”雜誌不能reproducibly表現出自由落體運動走的道路，最大的阻力是由於重力單，那就是充分的證據，向大家認為大眾機械師雜誌斷言的嚴重性，單是可以摧毀雙塔和建設007在近freefall速度是身體不可能 “ 流行神話 ” ＆ 刻意“大眾機械師”欺騙或誤解，事實上，誠實的重新物理定律。
Physical Systems ( 物理系統（
Kind regards 親切問候
JA Blacker MSc IMI (Physical Systems)( 司法機構政務長黑色海安IMI的（物理系統） （
Have Your Say: Open letter to Popular Mechanics - Prove your ludicrous 9/11 theories in public 你說：公開信大眾機械師-證明您的可笑9 / 1 1理論在公共
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。
Or discuss this report in our our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的我們的新論壇
One Response to “Open letter to Popular Mechanics - Prove your ludicrous 9/11 theories in public” 1回應“的公開信大眾機械師-證明您的可笑9 / 1 1的理論在公眾”
trackback: 跟踪：
Posted: Oct 11th, 2007 at 10:39 pm | 發布時間： 2007年10月11日在下午10時39分| Link to this 鏈接到本
disinfo.com
Free Newsletter 免費通訊 
Related News 相關新聞
- Gina Dowding wins ballot for chance to become first Green MP吉娜dowding贏得選票的機會，成為第一個綠色國會議員
- 9/11: Irresponsible Science - POP MEC & Dr Seffen 9 / 11 ：不負責任的科學-流行邁克＆博士s effen
- Webster Tarpley - Lancaster韋伯斯特tarpley -蘭開斯特
- Bush is delivering Depleted Uranium to us all布什是提供貧化鈾給我們的所有
- Lancaster anti-supermarket protest camp蘭開斯特反超市抗議營地
Email This Page To A Friend 電子郵件此頁給朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題
- Iraq ‘Divide and Rule’ Strategy Called Shortsighted伊拉克'分而治之的策略所謂短視
- UN official decries weakening of press freedom聯合國官員decries削弱新聞自由
- DNA database solves 1 in 800 crimes DNA資料庫，解決了1在800的罪行
- 3.5 Million Tons of Plastic Floating in the Pacific 350萬噸的塑料漂浮在太平洋
- Al Jazeera Cameraman Freed From Guantánamo卡塔爾半島電視台的攝影師，從關塔那摩獲釋
- Obama and Wright: Different Worldviews奧巴馬和賴特：不同的世界觀，
- America’s Chemically Modified 21st Century Soldiers美國的化學修飾的21世紀士兵
- We’ve been given a yellow card - Labour我們已經給出了一張黃牌-勞工
- Renditions Ruin the EU Case演繹破壞了歐盟的情況
- Hundreds killed by Burma cyclone數百名殺害的緬甸氣旋
More更多 Breaking News突發新聞
Archive 存檔
Open letter to Popular Mechanics - Prove your ludicrous 9/11 theories in public 公開信向大眾機械師-證明您的可笑9 / 1 1理論在公共
Direct challenge to “Popular Mechanics” - Show us the Physics & Maths to back up your ludicrous & “physically impossible” 911 gravity collapse assertions.直接挑戰“大眾機械師” -向我們顯示的物理及數學備份您的可笑＆ “身體是不可能的” 9 11重力崩潰的說法。 Read entire letter here.閱讀整篇信在這裡。