國際新聞 | 論壇 | 英國新聞 | 美國新聞 | 全球性新聞 | 政治報紙 | Sci技術新聞 | 戰爭&恐怖主義新聞 | 體育新聞 | 多媒體 | 設置主頁

翻譯：

星期五， 2007年6月22日

由 吉姆Fetzer

政府提供的黑匣子數據的研究給飛行員為9/11真相證實了學者的早先研究結果為9/11真相波音757在9/11沒有擊中五角大樓。 「我們有波音757沒有擊中大廈證明的四條線」，說詹姆斯Fetzer，學者的創建者為9/11真相。 「這項新的研究由Pilots駕駛另一個釘子入一個棺材謊言由9/11委員會告訴了美國人民」。

新的社會、飛行員的一個國際組織和航空專家，訴請了國家安全運輸委員會(NTSB)在信息行動之下自由并且得到了它的2002報告關於美國航空航班77，根據正式帳戶，在它以後擊中五角大樓基層撇取在草坪在500哩/時，去掉一系列的燈崗位在過程中的波音757。 飛行員不僅得到了飛行數據，但創造計算機動畫展示什麼它告訴他們。

根據Pilots發布的報告為9/11真相(http://pilotsfor911truth.org/), 有正式帳戶和飛行數據之間的主要區別：

a. NTSB飛行路徑動畫進場航道和高度不支持正式事件。

b. 所有高度數據顯示航空器至少300英尺太高以至於不能觸擊了燈柱。

c. 下降率數據在直接衝突用航空器能衝擊燈柱和被奪取在國防部「對象的5個框架」錄影移動幾乎與五角大樓草坪平行。

d. 數據紀錄在正式衝擊時間之前停止一至少秒。

e. 如果數據趨向繼續，航空器高度將是至少100英尺太高以至於不能擊中了五角大樓。

作為羅伯特Balsamo，飛行員的共同創立者為9/11真相，觀察， 「信息在NSTB文件不支持和事實上例如抗辯，正式政府位置在2001年9月11日的早晨，美國航空航班77觸擊了五角大樓」。 研究由十五名專業飛行員簽字以廣泛的軍事和商業載體經驗。 他們做了他們的動畫， 「Pandora的箱子： 第2章」，可利用對公眾在 http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Pandora』 s+Black+Box%3A+Chapter+2 .

根據詹姆斯H。 Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (http://911scholars.org), this result fits into the broader picture of what happened at the Pentagon that day. “We have developed four lines of argument that prove–conclusively, in my judgment–that no Boeing 757 hit the building. The most important evidence to the contrary has been the numerous eyewitness reports of a large commercial carrier coming toward the building. If the NTSB data is correct, then the Pilot’s study shows that a large aircraft headed toward the building but did not impact with it. It swerved off and flew above the Pentagon.”

Fetzer, who retired last June after 35 years of teaching courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, expressed pleasure over the Pilot’s results, which, he said, has neatly resolved the most pressing issue that remained about the Pentagon. He added, “We have previously developed several lines of argument, each of which proves that no Boeing 757 hit the building,” including these four:

1. The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: there were no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Not even the engines were recovered, and they are practically indestructible.
2. Of an estimate 84 videotapes of the crash, the three that have been released by the Pentagon do not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O’Reilly admitted when one was shown on “The Factor”. At 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 77-foot Pentagon is high and should have been visible. There are indications of a much smaller plane, but not a Boeing 757.
3. Indeed, the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory–flying more than 500 mph barely above ground level–physically impossible, because of the accumulation of a massive pocket of compressed gas (air) beneath the fuselage; and if it had come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the official trajectory is impossible.
4. Flying low enough to impact with the ground floor would have meant that the enormous engines were plowing the ground and creating massive furrows; but there are no massive furrows. The smooth, unblemished surface of the Pentagon lawn thus stands as a “smoking gun” proving the official trajectory cannot be sustained.

Members of Scholars have contributed to a new book that analyses the government’s official account, according to which 19 Islamic fundamentalists hijacked four commercial airliners, outfoxed the most sophisticated air-defense system in the world, and committed these atrocities under the control of a man in a cave in Afghanistan. Entitled, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), it includes photographs of the hit point before and after the upper floors collapsed, the crucial frame from the released videos, and views of the clear, smooth, and unblemished lawn.

“Don’t be taken in by photos showing damage to the second floor or those taken after the upper floors collapsed, which happened 20-30 minutes later,” Fetzer said. “In fact, debris begins to show up on the completely clean lawn in short order, which might have been dropped from a C-130 that was circling above the Pentagon or placed there by men in suits who were photographed carrying debris with them.” The most striking is a piece from the fuselage of a commercial airliner, which is frequently adduced as evidence.

James Hanson, a newspaper reporter who earned his law degree from the University of Michigan College of Law, has traced that debris to an American Airlines 757 that crashed in a rain forest above Cali, Columbia in 1995. “It was the kind of slow-speed crash that would have torn off paneling in this fashion, with no fires, leaving them largely intact.” Fetzer has been so impressed with his research he has invited Hanson to submit his study to Scholars for consideration for publication on its web site, 911scholars.org.

“The Pentagon has become a kind of litmus test for rationality in the study of 9/11,” Fetzer said. “Those who persist in maintaining that a Boeing 757 hit the building are either unfamiliar with the evidence or cognitively impaired. Unless,” he added, “they want to mislead the American people. The evidence is beyond clear and compelling. It places this issue ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’. No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.”

Have Your Say: New Study: No Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report here.

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Related News

• 9/11 Truth - New Study Raises More Questions
• Calum Douglas On TalkSport Radio - Sunday
• U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ Pilot Questions 9/11
• OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11 FLIGHT CONTRADICTED BY GOVERNMENT’S OWN DATA
• Flight 77 - Black Box Data Analysis

This entry was posted on Friday, June 22nd, 2007 at 3:21 am and is filed under 9/11 Truth, Breaking News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Activism News Afghanistan Alternative-Energy Art Barack Obama BBC Big-Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CCTV Censorship CIA Climate-Change Cover-Up Cults Culture Database-State David-Hicks David-Ray-Griffin Debt Democrats Demos Drugs Education Entertainment Environmental News EU False-Flag FBI Fraud Free-Speech Freemasons G8 Global-News Global-News Globalization Guantanamo Health-News History ID-Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel John McCain Law Marches Media News MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons New World Order NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police-State Political News Propaganda Reviews RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Science & Technology News Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spy Spying Stephen-Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony-Blair Torture TV UK-News UN USA- USA-News Video Voting war War & Terrorism News Warfare Web Development News White-House Wolfowitz World_News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version