Последние новости | Форум | UK новости | Новости США | Новости мира | Политические новости | Новости Sci-Техника | Новости войны & террорисма | Новости спортов | Multimedia | Установите Homepage

Суббота 22-ое июнь 2007
Обсудите этот рапорт в форумах RINF >

Джим Fetzer

Изучение данных по черного ящика обеспеченных правительством к пилотам для 9/11 правд подтвердило ранее заключения эрудитов для 9/11 правд что никакой Boeing 757 не ударил пентагон на 9/11. «Мы имели 4 линии доказательства никакой Boeing 757 не ударил здание,» сказали Джеймс Fetzer, основателя эрудитов для 9/11 правд. «Это новое изучение Пилотом управляет другим ногтем в гроб лож сказало американские людей комиссией 9/11».

Новое общество, международная организация пилотов и профессионалы авиации, урезонили национальную доску безопасности перевозки (NTSB) под свободой информации поступок и получили свой полет 2002 American Airlines отчет о 77, Boeing 757 который, согласно официальному учету, ударьте нижний этаж пентагона после его skimmed над лужайкой на 500 mph плюс, принимающ вне серию столбов светильника в процессе. Пилоты not only получили данные по полета но создали компьютерную мультипликацию для того чтобы продемонстрировать она сказала им.

Согласно рапорту выданному Пилотом для 9/11 правд (http://pilotsfor911truth.org/), будут основные отличии между официальным учетом и данными по полета:

A. Курс и высота подходу к одушевленност курса полета NTSB не поддерживают официальные случаи.

B. Все на данные по высоты показано самолету по крайней мере 300 футов слишком высоких для того чтобы поразить светлые полюсы.

C. Тариф данных по спуска находится в сразу конфликте при самолет плотно сжать светлые полюсы и быть захващенным в министерстве обороны «видеоий 5 кадров» предмета перемещая близко параллельного с лужайкой пентагона.

D. Показатель данных останавливает по крайней мере одну секунду до официального времени удара.

E. Если тенденции данных продолжены, то высота самолета была бы по крайней мере в 100 футов слишком высоких ударить пентагон.

Как Роберт Balsamo, co-основатель пилотов для 9/11 правд, наблюдает, «информация в документах NSTB не поддерживает, и in some instances factually противоречит, официальное положение правительства что полет 77 American Airlines поразил пентагон на утре 11-ое сентября 2001.» Изучение было подписано 15 профессиональными пилотами с обширным воинским и коммерчески опытом несущей. They have made their animation, “Pandora’s Box: Chapter 2,” available to the public at http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Pandora’s+Black+Box%3A+Chapter+2 .

According to James H. Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (http://911scholars.org), this result fits into the broader picture of what happened at the Pentagon that day. “We have developed four lines of argument that prove–conclusively, in my judgment–that no Boeing 757 hit the building. The most important evidence to the contrary has been the numerous eyewitness reports of a large commercial carrier coming toward the building. If the NTSB data is correct, then the Pilot’s study shows that a large aircraft headed toward the building but did not impact with it. It swerved off and flew above the Pentagon.”

Fetzer, who retired last June after 35 years of teaching courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, expressed pleasure over the Pilot’s results, which, he said, has neatly resolved the most pressing issue that remained about the Pentagon. He added, “We have previously developed several lines of argument, each of which proves that no Boeing 757 hit the building,” including these four:

1. The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: there were no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Not even the engines were recovered, and they are practically indestructible.
2. Of an estimate 84 videotapes of the crash, the three that have been released by the Pentagon do not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O’Reilly admitted when one was shown on “The Factor”. At 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 77-foot Pentagon is high and should have been visible. There are indications of a much smaller plane, but not a Boeing 757.
3. Indeed, the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory–flying more than 500 mph barely above ground level–physically impossible, because of the accumulation of a massive pocket of compressed gas (air) beneath the fuselage; and if it had come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the official trajectory is impossible.
4. Flying low enough to impact with the ground floor would have meant that the enormous engines were plowing the ground and creating massive furrows; but there are no massive furrows. The smooth, unblemished surface of the Pentagon lawn thus stands as a “smoking gun” proving the official trajectory cannot be sustained.

Members of Scholars have contributed to a new book that analyses the government’s official account, according to which 19 Islamic fundamentalists hijacked four commercial airliners, outfoxed the most sophisticated air-defense system in the world, and committed these atrocities under the control of a man in a cave in Afghanistan. Entitled, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), it includes photographs of the hit point before and after the upper floors collapsed, the crucial frame from the released videos, and views of the clear, smooth, and unblemished lawn.

“Don’t be taken in by photos showing damage to the second floor or those taken after the upper floors collapsed, which happened 20-30 minutes later,” Fetzer said. “In fact, debris begins to show up on the completely clean lawn in short order, which might have been dropped from a C-130 that was circling above the Pentagon or placed there by men in suits who were photographed carrying debris with them.” The most striking is a piece from the fuselage of a commercial airliner, which is frequently adduced as evidence.

James Hanson, a newspaper reporter who earned his law degree from the University of Michigan College of Law, has traced that debris to an American Airlines 757 that crashed in a rain forest above Cali, Columbia in 1995. “It was the kind of slow-speed crash that would have torn off paneling in this fashion, with no fires, leaving them largely intact.” Fetzer has been so impressed with his research he has invited Hanson to submit his study to Scholars for consideration for publication on its web site, 911scholars.org.

“The Pentagon has become a kind of litmus test for rationality in the study of 9/11,” Fetzer said. “Those who persist in maintaining that a Boeing 757 hit the building are either unfamiliar with the evidence or cognitively impaired. Unless,” he added, “they want to mislead the American people. The evidence is beyond clear and compelling. It places this issue ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’. No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.”

See More:False Flag 

Discuss this report in the RINF forums >

Have Your Say: New Study: No Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

This entry was posted on Friday, June 22nd, 2007 at 3:21 am and is filed under 9/11 Truth, Breaking News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Afghanistan Alternative Energy Art BBC Big Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CIA Climate Change Cover Up Cults Culture Database State David Hicks David Ray Griffin Democrats Demos Drugs Education EU False Flag FBI Fraud Free Speech Freemasons G8 Globalization Guantanamo Health News History ID Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel Law Marches MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police State Propaganda RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spying Stephen Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony Blair Torture TV UK News UN USA News Video Voting Warfare White House Wolfowitz World News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version