속보 | 공개토론 | 영국 뉴스 | 미국 뉴스 | 월드 뉴스 | 정치 뉴스 | Sci 기술 뉴스 | 전쟁 & 공포정치 뉴스 | 스포츠 뉴스 | 멀티미디어 | 홈페이지를 놓으십시오

금요일, 2007년 6월 22일
RINF 공개토론에 있는 이 보고를 토론하십시오 >

에 의하여 짐 Fetzer

9/11의 진실을 조종사에게 정부에 의해 제공된 비행 기록 장치 자료의 학문은 아무 보잉도 757가 9/11에 펜타곤을 명중하지 않았다 9/11의 진실을 위한 학자의 이전 발견을 확인했다. "우리는 아무 보잉도 757가 건물을 명중하지 않은 증거의 4개의 선이," 말했다 제임스 Fetzer 의 9/11의 진실을 위한 학자의 창시자를 있었다. "pilots 에의한 이 새로운 학문 9/11 위원회 에의한 사기의 관으로 다른 못을 말했다 미국 사람들을"는 몬다.

조종사의 새로운 사회, 국제 기관 및 항공 전문가는 정보 행위의 자유의 밑에, 교통 안전국 (NTSB)를 각축하고 아메리카 항공 비행 77, 공식적인 계정에 따르면, 그것 후에 펜타곤의 1층을 대충 훑어 본 500 MPH에 잔디밭 상공에 명중하십시오 보잉 757에 그것의 2002 보고를 얻어, 과정에 있는 일련의 램프 포스트를 밖으로 가지고 간. 조종사는 뿐만 아니라 비행 자료를 얻고 그러나 그들에게 말한 무슨과 설명하기 위하여 컴퓨터 애니메이션을 창조했다.

9/11의 진실을 위한 Pilots가 발행하는 보고에 따르면 (http://pilotsfor911truth.org/), 공식적인 계정과 비행 자료의 중요한 차이가 있다:

a. NTSB 비행 경로 생기 진입로 및 고도는 공식적인 사건을 지원하지 않는다.

b. 모든 고도 자료는 항공기에게 적어도 300 피트를 너무 높은 전등 기둥을 치기 위하여 보여준다.

c. 자료 강하율은 전등 기둥에 충격을 가하고 국방부에서 이동하는 펜타곤 잔디밭과 평행한 목표의 "붙잡을 수 있는 항공기와의 직접적인 충돌에 5개의 구조" 영상 거의 있다.

d. 자료의 기록은 공식적인 충격 시간 이전에 적어도 1 초 멈춘다.

e. 자료 동향이 계속되는 경우에, 항공기 고도는 적어도 100 피트 너무 높을 명중하기 위하여 펜타곤을.

로버트 Balsamo로, 9/11의 진실을 위한 조종사의 공동 출자자는, 관찰한다, 아메리카 항공 비행 77가 2001년 9월 11일 아침에 펜타곤을."는 쳤다 "NSTB 문서에 있는 정보 지원하지 않으며, 경우에 따라서는 사실로, 공식적인 정부 위치 모순된다 학문은 광대한 군과 상업적인 운반대 경험을 가진 15명의 직업적인 조종사에 의해 서명되었다. They have made their animation, “Pandora’s Box: Chapter 2,” available to the public at http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Pandora’s+Black+Box%3A+Chapter+2 .

According to James H. Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (http://911scholars.org), this result fits into the broader picture of what happened at the Pentagon that day. “We have developed four lines of argument that prove–conclusively, in my judgment–that no Boeing 757 hit the building. The most important evidence to the contrary has been the numerous eyewitness reports of a large commercial carrier coming toward the building. If the NTSB data is correct, then the Pilot’s study shows that a large aircraft headed toward the building but did not impact with it. It swerved off and flew above the Pentagon.”

Fetzer, who retired last June after 35 years of teaching courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, expressed pleasure over the Pilot’s results, which, he said, has neatly resolved the most pressing issue that remained about the Pentagon. He added, “We have previously developed several lines of argument, each of which proves that no Boeing 757 hit the building,” including these four:

1. The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: there were no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Not even the engines were recovered, and they are practically indestructible.
2. Of an estimate 84 videotapes of the crash, the three that have been released by the Pentagon do not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O’Reilly admitted when one was shown on “The Factor”. At 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 77-foot Pentagon is high and should have been visible. There are indications of a much smaller plane, but not a Boeing 757.
3. Indeed, the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory–flying more than 500 mph barely above ground level–physically impossible, because of the accumulation of a massive pocket of compressed gas (air) beneath the fuselage; and if it had come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the official trajectory is impossible.
4. Flying low enough to impact with the ground floor would have meant that the enormous engines were plowing the ground and creating massive furrows; but there are no massive furrows. The smooth, unblemished surface of the Pentagon lawn thus stands as a “smoking gun” proving the official trajectory cannot be sustained.

Members of Scholars have contributed to a new book that analyses the government’s official account, according to which 19 Islamic fundamentalists hijacked four commercial airliners, outfoxed the most sophisticated air-defense system in the world, and committed these atrocities under the control of a man in a cave in Afghanistan. Entitled, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), it includes photographs of the hit point before and after the upper floors collapsed, the crucial frame from the released videos, and views of the clear, smooth, and unblemished lawn.

“Don’t be taken in by photos showing damage to the second floor or those taken after the upper floors collapsed, which happened 20-30 minutes later,” Fetzer said. “In fact, debris begins to show up on the completely clean lawn in short order, which might have been dropped from a C-130 that was circling above the Pentagon or placed there by men in suits who were photographed carrying debris with them.” The most striking is a piece from the fuselage of a commercial airliner, which is frequently adduced as evidence.

James Hanson, a newspaper reporter who earned his law degree from the University of Michigan College of Law, has traced that debris to an American Airlines 757 that crashed in a rain forest above Cali, Columbia in 1995. “It was the kind of slow-speed crash that would have torn off paneling in this fashion, with no fires, leaving them largely intact.” Fetzer has been so impressed with his research he has invited Hanson to submit his study to Scholars for consideration for publication on its web site, 911scholars.org.

“The Pentagon has become a kind of litmus test for rationality in the study of 9/11,” Fetzer said. “Those who persist in maintaining that a Boeing 757 hit the building are either unfamiliar with the evidence or cognitively impaired. Unless,” he added, “they want to mislead the American people. The evidence is beyond clear and compelling. It places this issue ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’. No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.”

See More:False Flag 

Discuss this report in the RINF forums >

Have Your Say: New Study: No Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

This entry was posted on Friday, June 22nd, 2007 at 3:21 am and is filed under 9/11 Truth, Breaking News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Afghanistan Alternative Energy Art BBC Big Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CIA Climate Change Cover Up Cults Culture Database State David Hicks David Ray Griffin Democrats Demos Drugs Education EU False Flag FBI Fraud Free Speech Freemasons G8 Globalization Guantanamo Health News History ID Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel Law Marches MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police State Propaganda RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spying Stephen Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony Blair Torture TV UK News UN USA News Video Voting Warfare White House Wolfowitz World News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version