ワールド・ニュース | フォーラム | イギリスのニュース | 米国のニュース | 全体的なニュース | 政治ニュース | Sci技術のニュース | 戦争及びテロリズムのニュース | スポーツのニュース | マルチメディア | ホームページを置きなさい

翻訳しなさい:

金曜日、2007年6月22日

によって ジムFetzer

9/11の真実に操縦者に政府によって提供されるブラックボックスデータの調査はボイング757が9/11の米国国防総省に当らなかったこと9/11の真実のための学者の前の調査結果を確認した。 「私達はボイング757が建物に当らなかった証拠の4ラインを」、言ったジェームスFetzerの9/11の真実のための学者の創設者を有した。 「Pilotsによるこの新しい調査9/11の任務によってうその棺に別の釘を言ったアメリカの人々を」は運転する。

操縦者の新しい社会、国際機構および航空専門家は情報行為の自由の下で、国家運輸安全委員会(NTSB)に嘆願し、アメリカン航空飛行77、公式の記述に従って、それの後で米国国防総省の地上階に上澄みができた500 MPHで芝生に当りなさいボイング757の2002レポートを得、プロセスの一連のランプのポストを取る。 ただフライトデータ得られないが、それらに告げたことを示すコンピュータ・アニメーション作成されない操縦者。

9/11の真実のためのPilots著出されるレポートに従って(http://pilotsfor911truth.org/), 公式の記述とフライトデータ間に主な違いがある:

a. NTSBの飛行経路の生気の進入路および高度は公式のでき事を支えない。

b. すべての高度データは航空機に少なくとも軽い棒を打つには300フィートを余りにも高い示す。

c. データ降下率は軽い棒に影響を与え、防衛のDeptで移動する米国国防総省の芝生と平行目的の「捕獲できる航空機との直接対立に5つのフレーム」のビデオほぼある。

D. データの記録は公式の影響の時間前の少なくとも1秒を停止する。

e. データ傾向が続けば、航空機の高度は少なくとも100フィート余りに高かろうだろう当るために米国国防総省に。

ロバートBalsamoとして、9/11の真実のための操縦者の共同出資者は、観察する、アメリカン航空飛行77が2001年9月11日の朝に米国国防総省を」。は打ったこと「NSTB文書の情報支えないし、場合によっては事実上、公式の政府の位置否定する 調査は広汎な軍および商業キャリアの経験の15人の専門の操縦者によって署名された。 それらは生気を、「Pandoraの箱作った: 第2章」、で公衆に利用できる http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Pandora」 s+Black+Box%3A+Chapter+2 .

ジェームスH.に従って。 Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (http://911scholars.org), this result fits into the broader picture of what happened at the Pentagon that day. “We have developed four lines of argument that prove–conclusively, in my judgment–that no Boeing 757 hit the building. The most important evidence to the contrary has been the numerous eyewitness reports of a large commercial carrier coming toward the building. If the NTSB data is correct, then the Pilot’s study shows that a large aircraft headed toward the building but did not impact with it. It swerved off and flew above the Pentagon.”

Fetzer, who retired last June after 35 years of teaching courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, expressed pleasure over the Pilot’s results, which, he said, has neatly resolved the most pressing issue that remained about the Pentagon. He added, “We have previously developed several lines of argument, each of which proves that no Boeing 757 hit the building,” including these four:

1. The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: there were no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Not even the engines were recovered, and they are practically indestructible.
2. Of an estimate 84 videotapes of the crash, the three that have been released by the Pentagon do not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O’Reilly admitted when one was shown on “The Factor”. At 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 77-foot Pentagon is high and should have been visible. There are indications of a much smaller plane, but not a Boeing 757.
3. Indeed, the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory–flying more than 500 mph barely above ground level–physically impossible, because of the accumulation of a massive pocket of compressed gas (air) beneath the fuselage; and if it had come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the official trajectory is impossible.
4. Flying low enough to impact with the ground floor would have meant that the enormous engines were plowing the ground and creating massive furrows; but there are no massive furrows. The smooth, unblemished surface of the Pentagon lawn thus stands as a “smoking gun” proving the official trajectory cannot be sustained.

Members of Scholars have contributed to a new book that analyses the government’s official account, according to which 19 Islamic fundamentalists hijacked four commercial airliners, outfoxed the most sophisticated air-defense system in the world, and committed these atrocities under the control of a man in a cave in Afghanistan. Entitled, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), it includes photographs of the hit point before and after the upper floors collapsed, the crucial frame from the released videos, and views of the clear, smooth, and unblemished lawn.

“Don’t be taken in by photos showing damage to the second floor or those taken after the upper floors collapsed, which happened 20-30 minutes later,” Fetzer said. “In fact, debris begins to show up on the completely clean lawn in short order, which might have been dropped from a C-130 that was circling above the Pentagon or placed there by men in suits who were photographed carrying debris with them.” The most striking is a piece from the fuselage of a commercial airliner, which is frequently adduced as evidence.

James Hanson, a newspaper reporter who earned his law degree from the University of Michigan College of Law, has traced that debris to an American Airlines 757 that crashed in a rain forest above Cali, Columbia in 1995. “It was the kind of slow-speed crash that would have torn off paneling in this fashion, with no fires, leaving them largely intact.” Fetzer has been so impressed with his research he has invited Hanson to submit his study to Scholars for consideration for publication on its web site, 911scholars.org.

“The Pentagon has become a kind of litmus test for rationality in the study of 9/11,” Fetzer said. “Those who persist in maintaining that a Boeing 757 hit the building are either unfamiliar with the evidence or cognitively impaired. Unless,” he added, “they want to mislead the American people. The evidence is beyond clear and compelling. It places this issue ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’. No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.”

Have Your Say: New Study: No Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report here.

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Related News

• 9/11 Truth - New Study Raises More Questions
• Calum Douglas On TalkSport Radio - Sunday
• U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ Pilot Questions 9/11
• OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11 FLIGHT CONTRADICTED BY GOVERNMENT’S OWN DATA
• Flight 77 - Black Box Data Analysis

This entry was posted on Friday, June 22nd, 2007 at 3:21 am and is filed under 9/11 Truth, Breaking News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Activism News Afghanistan Alternative-Energy Art Barack Obama BBC Big-Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CCTV Censorship CIA Climate-Change Cover-Up Cults Culture Database-State David-Hicks David-Ray-Griffin Debt Democrats Demos Drugs Education Entertainment Environmental News EU False-Flag FBI Fraud Free-Speech Freemasons G8 Global-News Global-News Globalization Guantanamo Health-News History ID-Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel John McCain Law Marches Media News MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons New World Order NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police-State Political News Propaganda Reviews RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Science & Technology News Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spy Spying Stephen-Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony-Blair Torture TV UK-News UN USA- USA-News Video Voting war War & Terrorism News Warfare Web Development News White-House Wolfowitz World_News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version