International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal國際公民的9 / 11戰爭罪行法庭

Independent Scientist Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre to call for International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal獨立科學家leuren moret和國際律師阿爾弗雷德webre呼籲國際社會公民的9 / 11戰爭罪行法庭

International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal 國際公民的9 / 11戰爭罪行法庭

VANCOUVER, BC - In order to prosecute the 9/11 perpetrators under the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act,  Independent Scientist/DU Radiation Expert Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre will call for the establishment of an International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, in a public announcement to be made at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference on Sunday June 24, 2007. 溫哥華 -以起訴9 / 1 1肇事者下9 / 1 1獨立檢察官法，獨立科學家/杜輻射專家l eurenm oret和國際律師阿爾弗雷德w ebre將呼籲成立一個國際公民的9 / 1 1戰爭罪行法庭，在作出公開聲明，在溫哥華9 / 11真理招待會上週日2007年6月24日。

Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, an international lawyer and Member of the Pro Tem Committee for the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal to be held in 2008, will make the announcement in an address to the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, on the issue of “The International 9/11 Citizen’s War Crimes Tribunal: The 9/11 False Flag Operation as a War Crime under International Law.”  According to Moret and Webre, 9/11 was a pretext to engage in Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq), to roll out a Terror-based National Security state-system world-wide, and to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy.阿爾弗雷德lambremont webre第納爾，地中海，一個國際律師和會員的餘胤委員會吉隆坡國際戰爭罪行法庭於2008年舉行，將宣布一個地址，以溫哥華9 / 11真理會議，就有關問題"國際9 / 11公民的戰爭罪行法庭： 9 / 11虛假旗化經營作為戰爭罪，根據國際法" ，但按照moret和webre ， 9 / 11是一個藉口，搞種族滅絕＆ ecocidal貧化鈾（杜）轟炸中亞（阿富汗和伊拉克） ，推出一種恐怖基於國家安全的國有制全世界範圍內，並執行最後階段的一個世界銷毀政策。

DATE/TIME OF 9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL ANNOUNCEMENT: 日期/時間9 / 11戰爭罪行法庭宣布：

Sunday, June 24, 2007 at 6PM PDT @ Main Stage週日， 2007年6月24日下午6時PDT治療@主舞台
The Maritime Labour Centre海事勞工中心
1880 Triumph St., Vancouver, BC V5L 1K3 1880年聖凱旋，不列顛哥倫比亞省溫哥華v5l 1k3
CANADA加拿大

The purpose of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to prosecute the perpetrators of the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001 under the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act for War Crimes, including Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Crimes Against Peace (now Aggressive War), as set out in the Nuremberg Principles, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.目的9 / 11戰爭罪行法庭起訴犯有虛假國旗運作2001年9月11日，根據9 / 11獨立檢察官法為戰爭罪行，包括滅絕種族罪，危害人類罪和破壞和平罪（現侵略性戰爭） ，有關內容已載列於紐倫堡原則，日內瓦四公約，和羅馬國際刑事法院的工作。

The 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act appoints an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the US Constitution to prosecute Treason against the United States of America by US President George W. Bush, US Vice President Richard B. Cheney, US Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the US Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a False Flag Operation. 9 / 11獨立檢察官法任命一名獨立檢察官的權力之下的第三條第（三）項美國憲法，以叛國罪起訴對美利堅合眾國的美國總統布什，美國副總統理查德切尼乙，美國書記，國防部長拉姆斯菲爾德和其他約翰和簡並為規劃和貫徹落實叛國，分裂國家，界定在第三條第（三）項美國憲法，由合謀進行，開展，和/或導致進行武裝攻擊後，這些美國對2001年9月11日，作為一項虛假國旗運作。 Article III of the US Constitution provides that, “Sect.第三條，美國憲法規定， "節。 3. 3 。 Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort….”叛國罪美國，應只是在發動戰爭，對他們的，還是在堅持他們的敵人，給予他們幫助和安慰… … " 。

The main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals - US President George W. Bush, US Vice President Richard B. Cheney, US Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001 are contained in a Legislative Memorandum to the US Congress accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act.  This Legislative Memorandum was co-authored by expert researcher David Ray Griffin, independent scientist Leuren Moret and attorney Alfred Webre.主要理由得出結論認為，有表面證據表明，被點名的人-美國總統布什，美國副總統理查德乙切尼，美國國防部長唐納德拉姆斯菲爾德-濫用權力，他們的辦公室，並承諾第三條叛國2001年9月11日載於一項立法備忘錄交給美國國會伴隨著9 / 11獨立檢察官法，這個立法備忘錄共同撰寫，由專家研究員朱射線格里芬，獨立科學家leuren moret和司法部長阿爾弗雷德webre 。

The facts recited in the Congressional Memorandum constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals—US President George W. Bush, US Vice President Richard B. Cheney, US Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld—and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III(3) of the US Constitution.  A Summary of the threshold of prima facie evidence is as follows.  For the full Congressional Memorandum, please go to the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act Website:事實吟誦在國會備忘錄構成表面證據顯示該姓名的個人美總統布什，美國副總統理查德乙切尼，美國國防部長唐納德拉姆斯菲爾德和其他約翰和簡是否是獨立和聯合犯有叛國罪對這些美國根據第三條第（三）項美國憲法。綜述門檻的表面證據，具體內容如下。以求充分國會備忘錄，請到9 / 11獨立檢察官法網址：

I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and NORAD had been followed.一，攻擊9 / 11 ，描繪在正式戶口，可沒有成功，如果標準作業程序與美國聯邦航空管理局（ FAA ）和挪威發展一直遵循的。 The Pentagon, under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD’s response, which means that at least two of them are false.五角大樓的領導下，拉姆斯菲爾德，提供了三個相互抵觸的帳目與NORAD的反應，這意味著至少有兩個人是假的。 Moreover, the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission, is contradicted by a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion.此外，第三個賬戶，由鉸接式9 / 11委員會，是相矛盾的，由廣泛的事實，其中包括證據表明，美國聯邦航空局曾通知與NORAD在不及時。 There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.因此必須已納入下訂單，而這些可能只來自最高級別的五角大樓和白宮。

II.二。 Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW).壓倒性的證據表明，坍塌的雙子塔和建設7個事例中的控制爆破，和/或應用異國情調的武器，如陸基，空基或可能基於空間的定向能武器（雨露） 。 But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down.但蓋達操作工無法獲得所需要的進入大廈，以植物的炸藥，而且不會有保證建築物來直線下降。 Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained commend and control of advanced Directed Energy Weapons, 4th generation mini-nuclear weapons, or other exotic weapons alternatives that are known to be in the deployment or testing phase in the US Defense arsenal.也不能蓋達操作工獲得表彰和控制先進的定向能武器，第4代小型核武器或其他外來武器的替代辦法，知道是在部署或試驗階段，在美國國防部的阿森納。 The controlled demolition or Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or exotic weapons application, therefore, had to be the work of insiders.  That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security.受控拆卸或定向能武器（雨露）或異國情調的武器應用，因此，已成為工作的內行。表示，布什總統是其中一人是內部人員所提出的事實，即他的弟弟和堂弟被校長在該公司負責人對世台會的安全。 Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which is normally a federal offense.共謀，在最高級別的聯邦政府還表示，通過搬遷證據（坍塌鋼） ，這是通常為聯邦罪。 Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the President and the Secretary of Defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings - or with the use of exotic Directed Energy Weapons -  implies their involvement in the latter as well.最後，如果在飛機上的罷工可能發生的，只有徵得總統和國務卿防禦系統（建議在先前點） ，協調這些罷工與拆卸建築物-或與使用異國情調定向能武器-意味著他們參與後者為好。

III.三。 Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job.壓倒性的證據還存在的結論，即對五角大樓發動的襲擊是一個內部工作。 That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour’s incompetence; the choice of the Pentagon west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner’s coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757.該官員在故事可能不是真的，是顯而易見的，從許多事實：涉嫌劫機哈尼族中寫道的無能;選擇五角大樓西翼為目標;不可能的商業客機的未來返回華盛頓未被發現和撞擊五角大樓除非准許;以及缺乏實物證據一致攻擊一架波音757 。 That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government’s refusal to release videos of the strike.說，這次罷工是一個內部工作所隱含的虛假官方的故事，證據表明，這次罷工是由軍用飛機，清除證據的情況下，與政府的拒絕釋放影片的罷工行動。 This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.該操作可能難以有計劃，沒有參與國防部長拉姆斯菲爾德。

9/11 & DU at the Pentagon 9 / 11 ＆杜在五角大樓

In April, 2007, Leuren Moret exposed the US military’s illegal use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in target practice in Hawaii, in violation of US military regulations.  The elevated radiation readings she recorded were carried by ABC-TV news in Hawaii on April 29 & 30, 2007.在2007年4月， leuren moret暴露了美國軍方的非法使用貧鈾（杜）武器打靶在夏威夷，這違反了美國的軍事法規，高架輻射讀數記錄她進行了由美國廣播公司電視新聞在夏威夷4月29日及30日， 2007 。

Leuren Moret reported similar elevated radiation readings downwind from the Pentagon in Washington, DC on September 11, 2001.  Two days after 9/11, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that the crash site rubble was radioactive and that it was probably Depleted Uranium (DU) contaminating the Pentagon crash site rubble. leuren moret報導類似高架輻射讀數順風來自五角大樓在華盛頓就2001年9月11日，兩天後， 9 / 11 ，美國環境保護署（ EPA ）證實，墜機現場廢墟中被放射性，而且它可能枯竭鈾（杜）污染五角大樓墜機現場瓦礫。 The entry and exit holes through the Pentagon crash site were the signature of a kinetic energy penetrator, such as a Cruise missile, and the term “punch-out hole” was written by crash site investigators over the exit hole.  This is a military term used for kinetic energy penetrators.   Major Doug Rokke, former Director of the Gulf War I DU Cleanup Team, reported that an email from the Pentagon 30 minutes after impact confirmed a Cruise missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11.  Recently vast Uranium deposits have been reported in Khazakhstan and Afghanistan.入出境孔通過五角大樓墜機地點分別簽署了一項動能穿甲彈，如巡航導彈，並而言， "衝出洞"是由墜機現場調查員在出境洞，這是一個軍事術語用動能穿甲彈，主要道格rokke原主任海灣一戰杜清理小組報告說，一個電子郵件從五角大樓30分鐘的衝擊後證實巡航導彈擊中五角大樓9 / 11日前廣闊的鈾礦床已報導khazakhstan和阿富汗。 Khazakhstan is expected to out-produce Canada in Uranium production within 12 years. khazakhstan可望走出生產加拿大在鈾礦生產12年之久。 This exposes the economic interests behind the events of 9/11, specifically the unjustified military attack by the US on Afghanistan using 9/11 as a pretext.這暴露了經濟利益背後的事件， 9 / 11 ，更具體地說是沒有道理的軍事攻擊，是由美國對阿富汗使用9 / 11 ，作為一個藉口。

IV.四。 Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by President Bush’s remaining at the school after it was evident—given the truth of the official account—that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack.共謀，在最高級別的聯邦政府還表示，由布什總統繼續留在學校後，這是顯而易見的-鑑於真理的官方帳戶-說，美國經歷了一場突然襲擊。 This behavior makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school.這種行為是有道理的，只有布什和他帶領的秘密服務代理知道不會有任何襲擊學校。

V. The complicity of Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.五，共謀美國副總統切尼在對五角大樓發動的襲擊，並擊落飛行93所隱含的證詞局長峰田與假索賠9 / 11委員會的指導下，政府內幕弘zelikow ，至於何時切尼到總統的緊急作戰中心（ peoc ）時，他發了芽向下授權。

VI.六。 The conclusion from the evidence that members of the Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects—prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military—that would likely be possible only in the event of “a new Pearl Harbor.”結論從證據中的成員，布什政府精心策劃的襲擊事件9 / 11 ，是增強一個事實，即他們進行過一些大項目-起訴阿富汗戰爭和伊拉克戰爭，並獲得資金，以加快技術改造的軍事會可能是不可能的，只有在發生"的一個新的珍珠港事件" 。

The establishment of an International 9/11 Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the US have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11.  The Chairman of the US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 US Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the Act.  The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff.  The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions.建立一個國際9 / 11公民的9 / 11戰爭罪法庭是合理的，既然官方機構，在美國有沒有指派法律責任，為虛假國旗運作9 / 11 。內務委員會主席的美國國會眾議院代表司法委員會主席和他的高級工作人員親自審查了9 / 11獨立檢察官法和國會的備忘錄後， 2006年美國中期選舉中及高層人員舉行了兩次會議的代表，該法案。主席拒絕引進行為，儘管支持，為法是由他的高級工作人員。 9 / 11委員會未能採取宣誓證言，從布什和切尼，並達成了欺詐性的結論。

Comment on 'International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal' : 評論'國際公民的9 / 11戰爭罪行法庭' ：

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Related News: 相關新聞：