Σπάζοντας ειδήσεις | Φόρουμ | Βρετανικές ειδήσεις | ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΕΣ ειδήσεις | Παγκόσμιες ειδήσεις | Πολιτικές ειδήσεις | Ειδήσεις sci-τεχνολογία | Ειδήσεις πολέμου & τρομοκρατίας | Αθλητικές ειδήσεις | Πολυμέσα | Καθορισμένη αρχική σελίδα

Κυριακή, 17η Ιουνίου 2007

Ανεξάρτητος επιστήμονας Leuren Moret και διεθνής δικηγόρος Alfred Webre για να απαιτήσει δικαστήριο πολεμικών εγκλημάτων του διεθνούς πολίτη το 9/11

Δικαστήριο πολεμικών εγκλημάτων του διεθνούς πολίτη 9/11

ΒΑΝΚΟΥΒΕΡ, Π.Χ. - Προκειμένου να διωχθούν οι δράστες 9/11 στο πλαίσιο του 9/11 ανεξάρτητου νόμου κατηγόρων,  Η ανεξάρτητη Scientist/DU ακτινοβολία ειδικό Leuren Moret και ο διεθνής δικηγόρος Alfred Webre θα απαιτήσουν την καθιέρωση δικαστηρίου πολεμικών εγκλημάτων ενός διεθνούς πολίτη του 9/11, σε μια δημόσια ανακοίνωση για να γίνουν στο Βανκούβερ τη 9/11 διάσκεψη αλήθειας στις Κυριακή, 24 Ιουνίου 2007.

Ο Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MED, ένας διεθνείς δικηγόρος και ένα μέλος της υπέρ Επιτροπής Tem για το διεθνές δικαστήριο πολεμικών εγκλημάτων της Κουάλα Λουμπούρ που πραγματοποιείται το 2008, θα κάνει την ανακοίνωση σε μια διεύθυνση στο Βανκούβερ τη 9/11 διάσκεψη αλήθειας, σχετικά με το ζήτημα «του δικαστηρίου πολεμικών εγκλημάτων του διεθνούς 9/11 πολίτη: Η 9/11 ψεύτικη λειτουργία σημαιών ως πολεμικό έγκλημα βάσει του διεθνούς δικαίου.»  Σύμφωνα με Moret και Webre, το 9/11 ήταν μια πρόφαση για να συμμετέχει σε Genocidal & Ecocidal μείωσε το βομβαρδισμό ουράνιου (du) της κεντρικής Ασίας (Αφγανιστάν και Ιράκ), για να ξεδιπλώσει ένα τρόμος-βασισμένο κράτος-σύστημα εθνικής ασφάλειας παγκοσμίως, και για να εφαρμόσει τα τελικά στάδια μιας πολιτικής παγκόσμιου αποπληθυσμού.

DATE/TIME ΤΗΣ 9/11 ΑΝΑΚΟΙΝΩΣΗΣ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΗΡΙΩΝ ΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΩΝ ΕΓΚΛΗΜΑΤΩΝ:

Κυριακή, 24 Ιουνίου 2007 6PM στο κύριο στάδιο PDT @
Το θαλάσσιο κέντρο εργασίας
1880 θρίαμβος ST, Βανκούβερ, Π.Χ. V5L 1K3
ΚΑΝΑΔΑΣ

Ο σκοπός του δικαστηρίου πολεμικών εγκλημάτων 9/11 είναι να διώξει ποινικώς τους δράστες της ψεύτικης λειτουργίας σημαιών της 11ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2001 στο πλαίσιο του 9/11 ανεξάρτητου νόμου κατηγόρων για τα πολεμικά εγκλήματα, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της γενοκτονίας, τα εγκλήματα ενάντια στην ανθρωπότητα και τα εγκλήματα ενάντια στην ειρήνη (τώρα επιθετικός πόλεμος), όπως καθορίζεται στις αρχές της Νυρεμβέργης, τις Συνθήκες της Γενεύης, και το καταστατικό της Ρώμης του διεθνούς ποινικού δικαστηρίου.

Ο 9/11 ανεξάρτητος νόμος κατηγόρων διορίζει έναν ανεξάρτητο κατήγορο κάτω από την αρχή του άρθρου ΙΙΙ (3) των ΗΠΑ. Σύνταγμα για να διώξει ποινικώς την προδοσία ενάντια στις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες της Αμερικής από τις ΗΠΑ. Πρόεδρος George W. Ο Μπους, ΗΠΑ. Αντιπρόεδρος Richard B. Cheney, ΗΠΑ. Γραμματέας της υπεράσπισης Donald H. Rumsfeld και άλλοι John και η Jane Does για τον προγραμματισμό και την πραγματοποίηση των πράξεων της προδοσίας, όπως καθορίζεται στο άρθρο ΙΙΙ (3) των ΗΠΑ. Σύνταγμα, με τη συνωμοσία να πραγματοποιήσει, την πραγματοποίηση, ή/και την πρόκληση για να πραγματοποιηθεί ένοπλης επίθεση επάνω σε αυτές τις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες στις 11 Σεπτεμβρίου 2001, ως τμήμα μιας ψεύτικης λειτουργίας σημαιών. Article III of the U.S. Constitution provides that, “Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort….”

The main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals - U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001 are contained in a Legislative Memorandum to the U.S. Congress accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act.  This Legislative Memorandum was co-authored by expert researcher David Ray Griffin, independent scientist Leuren Moret and attorney Alfred Webre.

The facts recited in the Congressional Memorandum constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals—U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld—and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution.  A Summary of the threshold of prima facie evidence is as follows.  For the full Congressional Memorandum, please go to the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act Website:

I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD’s response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission, is contradicted by a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.

II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained commend and control of advanced Directed Energy Weapons, 4th generation mini-nuclear weapons, or other exotic weapons alternatives that are known to be in the deployment or testing phase in the US Defense arsenal. The controlled demolition or Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or exotic weapons application, therefore, had to be the work of insiders.  That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which is normally a federal offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the President and the Secretary of Defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings - or with the use of exotic Directed Energy Weapons -  implies their involvement in the latter as well.   

III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour’s incompetence; the choice of the Pentagon west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner’s coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government’s refusal to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.

9/11 & DU at the Pentagon

In April, 2007, Leuren Moret exposed the U.S. military’s illegal use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in target practice in Hawaii, in violation of U.S. military regulations.  The elevated radiation readings she recorded were carried by ABC-TV news in Hawaii on April 29 & 30, 2007.

Leuren Moret reported similar elevated radiation readings downwind from the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001.  Two days after 9/11, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that the crash site rubble was radioactive and that it was probably Depleted Uranium (DU) contaminating the Pentagon crash site rubble. The entry and exit holes through the Pentagon crash site were the signature of a kinetic energy penetrator, such as a Cruise missile, and the term “punch-out hole” was written by crash site investigators over the exit hole.  This is a military term used for kinetic energy penetrators.   Major Doug Rokke, former Director of the Gulf War I DU Cleanup Team, reported that an email from the Pentagon 30 minutes after impact confirmed a Cruise missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11.  Recently vast Uranium deposits have been reported in Khazakhstan and Afghanistan. Khazakhstan is expected to out-produce Canada in Uranium production within 12 years. This exposes the economic interests behind the events of 9/11, specifically the unjustified military attack by the U.S. on Afghanistan using 9/11 as a pretext.

IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by President Bush’s remaining at the school after it was evident—given the truth of the official account—that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school.

V. The complicity of Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.

VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects—prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military—that would likely be possible only in the event of “a new Pearl Harbor.”

The establishment of an International 9/11 Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11.  The Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the Act.  The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff.  The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions.

See More:False Flag 

Have Your Say: International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Please note, only selected comments will be published.

Or discuss this report in our new forums

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

This entry was posted on Sunday, June 17th, 2007 at 6:17 pm and is filed under 9/11 Truth . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Afghanistan Alternative Energy Art BBC Big Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CIA Climate Change Cover Up Cults Culture Database State David Hicks David Ray Griffin Democrats Demos Drugs Education EU False Flag FBI Fraud Free Speech Freemasons G8 Globalization Guantanamo Health News History ID Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel Law Marches MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police State Propaganda RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spying Stephen Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony Blair Torture TV UK News UN USA News Video Voting Warfare White House Wolfowitz World News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version